InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology

InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology
InformationWeek - Our New iPad App



Secret CIO
home
News
NewsFlash><BR></A>
		<A HREF= News In Review
Financials
IW Community
AuthorITies
Shop Talk
Careers
Secret CIO
Columnists
Feedback
Business Center
Resource Centers
Labs
Date Book



IW Daily
Subscriptions
Media Kit
IW Marketplace
IW International
Sitemap
June 17, 1997

letter image>
			<IMG SRC= Your letters to my print column and this E-mail forum ask some serious questions about managing information technology in today's world. Since today's world is essentially absurd, my serious responses may sometimes sound a little whimsical, and my occasional whimsical ones, serious. In any cas e, if you want to participate, write to me at secret@cmp.com . I'll respond to those letters that I can. I reserve the right to edit for size and content. Just sign your E-mail the way you want it to appear online.

The column titled "Why Did You Promote Him?" ( March 10, p. 128 ), which was about a technically excellent person who does not get the promotion he wanted, provoked more letters than I have received in a long time. The spectrum of comments was very broad. I'll share some of them with you in this and the next "Ask The Secret CIO" column. Let me know your thoughts on what others have had to say.

Herb

Dear Secret CIO,

Thank you for your recent article. I am one of the many "Freds" in computer departments who have been bypassed for promotion. I appreciate your insight into our problems. I struggle as Fred does with the code-speak that is cust omary in the higher administrative ranks.

When Fred asked why Bruce was selected over him, the question was redirected to a parallel topic. What would have been the downside to plainly and directly telling Fred your actual opinion of him? It seems that it is acceptable to think negatively about an employee, but not OK to verbalize it.

About the only advice I have found for the Freds of the world is to treat people like they would any other "task" or "problem." Do your analysis, design a solution, roll it out, maintain it.

On the administrative side, is there any way of letting team members know in advance where they rank on the promotion ladder? Would this help alleviate the "surprise" factor of announced promotions?

In your article you write, "but more important, people feel good about dealing with him." Is this "more important" job requirement listed on the job description? Does Fred's performance evaluations have specific measurable steps listed for this requirement?

Does the company ha ve a technical track available for Fred to be promoted through? Or is there only the administrative track set up by the administrators already within it to ensure their future career opportunities?

As you conclude your article, you describe your communication efforts as a big-time flunk. Now when Fred flunked in regards to his interpersonal skill set, he was punished by being bypassed for promotion and the loss of a pay increment. What will happen to you because of efforts with Fred? How much is [it] going to hurt you ?

Again, thank you for your article; its timing was wonderful and has given me more prompting for personal change.

Eric

Dear Eric,

You raise some interesting points that are important to Fred's future. I deliberately compared Fred's performance to the job description rather than to Bruce's qualifications because I am interested in having Fred reflect on his own traits, not evaluating whether he agr ees with my assessment of Bruce's.

There is no question that Fred does a good job at what he does, but if he is to have any chance of getting ahead in our company, he needs to understand that while technical skills get you in the door, good interpersonal skills frequently make the difference in who gets a promotion.

While I believe in open and frank performance evaluations, I've never been in favor of letting people know that they are on promotion (or succession planning) charts. Situations change and it is not a good idea to put too much stock in "heir apparent" lists that preordain whether a person has a future or not. It is better to prepare several people to be able to take a job -- for the sake of both their own careers and flexibility for the company.

Although our job descriptions do stress the importance of communication skills, and we have job ladders for purely technical types, Fred simply does not value anything very much except technical skills. My frustration with my own communication is that I was unable to help him see the value of something at which he does not easily excel. So far as my "punishment" for not being able to get through to him: While I can try to help him, ultimately it is Fred's responsibility to understand what he needs to get ahead.


Dear Herb:

Is Fred truly lost? What are your plans for him? If nothing changes, Fred will eventually leave the company as a disgruntled employee. Fred's attitudes will not change quickly but can possibly be changed. Lay out a program of training sessions to give Fred the basic communications skills required, then develop scenarios that allow Fred to use his new skills in a safe environment. Fred needs to HEAR what other people are saying, and he's probably not going to like it at first. If it's done in a safe, supportive environment, Fred will survive.

Now, why do all this? First, even if Fred never gets the message, he will probably realize and understand the effort the corporation made to support him and he will still leave, but not disgruntled. Second, the program you just developed (communications training and safe scenarios) can be used with dynamite results on other Freds who aren't as locked in.

Finally, I realize that Fred could very well be a fictional character to make a point. Fred exemplified the problem; maybe he can help investigate the solution, too.

Stuart in Alexandria

Dear Stuart:,

You are correct on all counts. Fred needs to accept what other people are saying. Our difficulty has been that he does not value their opinions very highly, so his choice is either to accept "that's what it takes to get the job he wants" or he has to have an epiphany and see that his way is not the only way.

One of the things we have done is to suggest to Fred that he spend some time working with others in the organization on some of our group activities that require social interactions such as community service. He has accepted, and it seems to be helping. We have in addition offered to send him to a class on personal interactions and he is planning to do that, also.


Secret CIO:

It is bullshit artists like you that try to propagate this myth that a nice guy is more capable of doing a job than a technically competent one.

Sincerely,

Anton

Dear Anton:

Actually, if two people are essentially technically equal, as are Bruce and Fred, the nice guy is more capable of doing the job. People tend to trust others who are nice to them over those who are condescending or abusive.


Dear Herb:

I thought that your discussion on communication skills in the technical workplace was excellent. I have promptly framed it in my cube. I am a Notes Administrator at Moore Business Forms and I can't stress enough the value of being able to communicate technical information to non-technically inclined individuals.

More important, such technical individuals must undergo that painful process to gain humility, in that our beloved technology does not drive business goals, but rather, we need to understand the business needs of those we serve and choose the best tools to reach that particular business goal.

I wonder -- what type of institution could let an individual almost complete his or her MBA without instilling this precept of knowledge into their students? I would be biased and propose that this school is a night course "for the working professional." I have always favored the MBA as a full-time educational experience rather than as a series of night courses at local colleges.

I understand your personal unhappiness, but I doubt that there was much more that you could do in this particular situation. I would love to work for a CIO who would take the time out to accurately assess my strengths and weakness. The very fact that you lament over the failure to get through to him and that you could not express the information in a way that he can process shows commendable understanding of human nature.

Elias F.

Dear Elias,

It is unfortunate that many people in our field do not recognize that confidence in us must be achieved before our technical skills are really appreciated. It is a hard lesson to learn that people will not trust someone whom do they do not feel is communicating clearly and candidly on a peer level with them.

I don't think the fact that Fred was getting his MBA at night had anything to do with his lack of education about interpersonal skills and training in how to master them. I have found that these skills are difficult to learn and honored more in theory than in practice in schools. Or, to put it another way, the best professors are those who can teach (that is, who can communicate), and we all know that they are not the most common commodity on college campuses.


Dear Secret CIO,

I couldn't agree more with your recent article, "Why Did You Promote Him?" Communication skills are extremely important, most likely in all areas of business, followed by competent technical skills. We like our technical people to be "approachable," which means they know what they are saying and know how to say it. In other words, they don't talk down to the people seeking their advice, and can speak their language instead of technical-ese).

One piece of advice for your employee Fred -- attend the Dale Carnegie course, or at least read his book, "How to Win Friends and Influence People" (Pocket Books). What a difference it has made for me at my present employer (two promotions later!). Of course, Fred has to accept that improvements in his com munications skills are in order -- or else he will gain nothing from this course.

Steve

Dear Steve:

I am delighted to know that your own efforts have been successful. You are to be congratulated for having the fortitude to improve an area where your skills were not what you wanted them to be. In addition to the one you mention, there are several books that would help Fred ensure that he is perceived as being the type of person who gets along well with others. Of course, as you point out, he has to believe that he needs to improve his abilities in interpersonal relationships. Among the easiest books to read is " So, What's Your Point? " By James C. Wetherbe and Bond Wetherbe (Meade Publishing, 1996). It is every bit the practical guide to learning and applying effective communication skills that it intends to be.


View past issues of "Ask The Secr et CIO"
June 3, 1997
May 20, 1997
May 6, 1997
April 22, 1997
April 8, 1997
March 25, 1997
March 11, 1997
Feb. 25, 1997
Feb. 11, 1997
Jan. 28, 1997
Jan. 14, 1997
Dec. 24, 1996
Dec. 3, 1996
Nov. 19, 1996
Nov. 5, 1996
Oct. 21, 1996
Oct. 7, 1996
Sept. 24 , 1996
Sept. 9, 1996
July 29, 1996
June 24, 1996

Got a question for The Secret CIO? Just send an E-mail .

Send Us Your Feedback

Top of the Page







Sign up for the InformationWeek Daily email newsletter

*Required field

Privacy Statement



This Week's Issue

Technology Whitepapers

Featured Reports







Video