InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology

InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology
InformationWeek - Our New iPad App



News In Review
Home
News
NewsFlash
News In Review
Financials
IW Community
AuthorITies
Shop Talk
Careers
Secret CIO
Columnists
Feedback
Business Center
Resource Centers
Labs
Date Book

Services
Contact IW
IW Daily
Subscriptions
Media Kit/Ed Cal
IW Marketplace
IW International
Site Map
July 7, 1997

Cozy Partners

By Bruce Caldwell

W hen it comes to buying and selling IT services, personal relationships count. Services providers want to foster good relationships with their cli ents as a way to shut out the competition. IT managers seek partners with proven track records and an understanding of their business goals.

"There needs to be understanding and trust between both," says Robert Mason, CIO of MicroAge Inc. in Tempe, Ariz., and head of the reseller's new services division.

In fact, Mason is mulling over the possibility of MicroAge's offering vendor-managed inventories to the IT services industry. In a former position as an IT executive at GE Lighting, Mason helped design a program to manage Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s inventories, restocking the giant retailer when inventory levels indicated it was time. Similarly, he says, an IT services vendor, responsible for managing a customer's desktop assets, might be in a position to proactively deliver upgrades.

Some vendor-client relationships become too close for comfort, necessitating that the terms of the relationship be recast. That was the case with Perot Systems Corp.'s two-year-old megadeal with Swiss Bank Corp.'s inv estment banking unit, according to an industry source. As Swiss Bank found out, services vendors that are frequently on site can get overloaded with requests from business units. They then find themselves engaged in projects without first having set priorities.

And, if the vendor is paid based on time and materials, there's an incentive to keep busy without worrying much about the business value of the activity.

New terms of the Perot-Swiss Bank agreement established a stronger framework for activities handled by Perot Systems, in Dallas. For example, any project undertaken by Perot Systems for Swiss Bank must help control costs, increase efficiencies, or provide higher levels of customer satisfaction. The amended agreement also downsizes the scale of Swiss Bank's commitment to Perot Systems by reducing the original, 25-year, $6.25 billion outsourcing contract to 10 years and about $2.5 billion. Swiss Bank also lowered its nearly 25% investment in Perot to 15%.

Finding the right level of commitme nt between parties can take time. But the flexibility to restructure contracts is a sure sign of a mature and healthy relationship.

Return to: " Too Much Choice? "


Back to News in Review

Send Us Your Feedback

Top of the Page

bottom navbar





Sign up for the InformationWeek Daily email newsletter

*Required field

Privacy Statement



This Week's Issue

Technology Whitepapers

Featured Reports







Video