hen it comes to hiring new people for your IT department, are
you hit with the capabilities crunch? Does your company place ads and select candidates based
on artificial credentials rather than capability? If so, you might end up with a dual problem--an
overpriced payroll and underperforming staff.
It's no surprise that companies find it difficult to attract and retain top IT talent. It's a seller's
market, with high-tech skills demanding high starting salaries and bonuses. With more jobs now
demanding new skills, you can expect to pay a premium for people experienced in Web design,
database administration, and SAP installations.
People who possess hot skills can easily fall prey to loyalty amnesia. I've seen generous salary
offers, sometimes 30% to 50% above what people are making in the jobs they currently
hold.
But here's the rub: The hiring process at most companies is flawed. To get the needed starting
salaries, IT managers end up playing a point game with human resource specialists. In the end,
the points needed for a hire add up to an impossible mix of skills.
Consider the case of IT director "Todd Bennett," the mythical representation of several IT chiefs
I know. Todd's strapped to the wall with Y2K projects and a growing number of enhancement
projects. He's understaffed. Company managers know he's understaffed. He needs to find qualified
help for several positions, and he's got the money.
He's been working with his human resources department for months. The HR staffers follow the
rules. They place want ads each week--but before Todd ever sees the responses, candidates are
squeezed through the "hiring filter," which requires a college degree and a set number of years of
experience.
One of the open positions, for a Web designer, requires experience in the field for seven years.
Since the Web has been commercially popular for only four years, finding acceptable candidates
with seven years experience may prove extremely difficult.
For several positions, Todd recently hired a few people. The hiring decision was based on their
credentials. But within days of hiring them, he was struck by their lack of real-world
knowledge. Now he has a new problem: getting rid of the certified but incompetent
workers.
Todd never saw the resumés of people who are technically qualified but lack a degree or
string of certifications such as Certified NetWare Engineer, Microsoft Certified Systems
Engineer, or other engineering seals of approval.
Is Todd missing much? I think he is. Unlike skills in some technical fields, computer acumen
isn't always a product of formal education. It is a product of experience, or a curious ability to
solve nonlinear problems.
Technical talent is a hard-to-see skill during an interview. It never shows up as a degree. But if
somebody's got it, he or she can master all kinds of leading-edge technology.
Certifications, by contrast, define only the ability to memorize facts for a limited area and get
them right for a test. For example, the Novell or Microsoft certifications, as good as they are,
don't necessarily turn out good network specialists.
Most brand-based network certification tests do not review knowledge of networking below ISO
layer 3. But in real life, if you encounter those problems, the company network doesn't work. It's
not going to stay up based on the certifications listed on your employees'
resumés.
So, what to do about today's hiring dilemma? It may be time to open up the hiring standards and
dig a little deeper into people's capability to learn. You might end up with employees better
suited to your particular needs, and earn their loyalty for having taken a chance on them. You
have everything to gain, and can build a stronger team in the process.
Cheryl Currid is president of Currid & Co., a technology consulting firm in Houston. She can be
contacted at cheryl@currid.com.