Analyzing RFID's Reliability And Stability Limitations
RFID and bar codes are both auto-identification technologies, but bar codes have a much longer track record and therefore boast greater reliability. In addition to stability issues, there are other potential shortcomings in the readiness of RFID that enterprises must understand and weigh.
Editor's note: This is the fourth in a series of RFID perspectives from Larry Shutzberg, vice president and chief information officer at Rock-Tenn Co., a leading manufacturer of consumer packaging, promotional displays, and recycled paperboard. In Part One, Shutzberg urged readers to not miss the innovation opportunity that RFID presents. In Part Two he detailed the costs and potential costs of RFID. In Part Three he provided an overview of key RFID technologies.
In this piece, Shutzberg compares RFID to bar codes and explains current limitations with RFID technology
Radio-frequency identification and bar codes are both auto-identification technologies. Though some futurists believe RFID tags eventually will cost pennies and one day will be used for everything, even they agree this vision is years away. In the meantime, manufacturers will continue to use bar-coded labels in the absence of RFID tags.
While bar-coded labels are generally reliable to read, RFID tags today are not always reliable and will not work with some products or in certain situations. Manufacturers will therefore continue to use bar-coded tags indefinitely as a fallback when RFID fails.
Given that RFID tags will not replace bar-coded labels any time soon, it's important to understand the distinct differences between these two auto-identification technologies.
This chart reflects some of the differences:
Inexpensive (but not reusable)
Costly (though potentially reusable)
Reliable to read
Not always reliable to read
Work with virtually all products
Work with most products but have trouble with some (such as those containing metals and liquids)
Can be printed before production or printed directly on items
Must be programmed, applied and verified individually, and data synchronization is usually required
Must be read one at a time and line of sight is required
Many tags can be read simultaneously and no line of sight is required
Written once with limited data
Can potentially be written multiple times, have higher capacity, and can be combined with sensors
Have a limited read range
Can have a longer read range
RFID technology has been around for years, but it has only recently been introduced to the consumer-goods supply chain. Due to the potential for enormous benefits (primarily for retailers), few question its inevitable widespread adoption. But RFID in our supply chain today is anything but stable. It is therefore critical to understand the many challenges, barriers, and issues with RFID deployment while developing an RFID mandate compliance strategy.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?