Government // Enterprise Architecture
News
11/7/2012
02:31 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple Hit With $368 Million Patent Verdict

Texas jury finds that Apple's FaceTime technology violates VirnetX's patents.

Apple One Year After Steve Jobs: Hits And Misses
Apple One Year After Steve Jobs: Hits And Misses
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Apple has been ordered to pay $368.2 million for violating secure communications patents owned by VirnetX Holding Corp., a technology licensing company based in Zephyr Cove, Nev.

A federal jury in Tyler, Texas, a popular venue for patent litigation, decided on Tuesday that Apple's FaceTime videoconferencing technology infringed VirnetX's patents but awarded the company only about half the damages it sought.

Apple did not respond to a request for comment about whether it will appeal the verdict.

The decision shows that the patent sword cuts both ways. In August, Apple was awarded over $1 billion when a jury found that Samsung had infringed Apple's patents. Samsung has appealed. And Apple wants to expand its claims against Samsung: On Wednesday, it asked a judge in the same court hearing a separate patent claim to add Samsung's Galaxy Note 10.1 and Google's Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) operating system to its complaint.

[ Read Apple Eyes Dumping Intel For ARM. ]

In 2010, Microsoft settled VirnetX's claim over the same technology for $200 million.

VirnetX has pending infringement claims against Avaya, Cisco and Siemens. It recently settled with Aastra, Mitel and NEC. Apple and Cisco last year asked the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to re-examine VirnetX's patents, in the hope of having them invalidated. Some of these re-examination requests are still pending and could affect the verdict against Apple and VirnetX's infringement claims against other companies.

Microsoft too claimed that VirnetX's patents were invalid. According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the company's expert witness pointed to products from Aventail, a Seattle company acquired by SonicWALL, as prior art that had been missed by the USPTO. However, the USPTO re-examination found the patents valid and Microsoft ended up settling.

In September, VirnetX renewed its complaint to the International Trade Commission to ban the sale of Apple's iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Mac computers. VirnetX says that case is expected to go to trial next year. If VirnetX succeeds in its ITC claim and wins an injunction, Apple will have to settle.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Terabyte Net
50%
50%
Terabyte Net,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2012 | 8:45:38 AM
re: Apple Hit With $368 Million Patent Verdict
Karma Apple, karma! Live by the sword, die by it. Apple has not actually invented anything on their own so if they're going to sue everyone under the sun, they'd better realize they're a MUCH bigger target than they used to be and they could very well end up sued out of business. Time they learn to play nice lest a few more "bytes" are taken out of that Apple logo.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 27, 2014
Who wins in cloud price wars? Short answer: not IT. Enterprises don't want bare-bones IaaS. Providers must focus on support, not undercutting rivals.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Howard Marks talks about steps to take in choosing the right cloud storage solutions for your IT problems
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.