Global CIO: Microsoft Slams Oracle For Limiting Choice But Seeks x86 Hegemony
Riddle me this: Oracle's integrated systems limit competition, which is bad, but it should kill Sparc to limit Wintel competition, which is good.
It would be a strange world indeed if Microsoft executives started saying warm and cozy things about archrival Oracle, so it was no big surprise to see Microsoft Server and Tools president Bob Muglia try to hammer away at Oracle's strategy at a tech conference last week.
But what was surprising was the ham-fisted approach taken by Muglia in his attempt to convince the audience of investors at the Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference that Oracle's strategy of offering vertically integrated systems will stunt customer choice while Microsoft itself wants nothing more than unlimited options for customers—that is, as long as all those options are x86.
Muglia was asked for his opinion on "this trend we're seeing in the market to vertically integrate," and the questioner offered three examples: Cisco and blades, EMC and VMware, and Oracle and Sun. Not surprisingly, Muglia ignored the first two and went right after Oracle:
"In terms of your second question with the verticalization of companies like Sun and Oracle, there's no question that there has been a trend—I sort of look at it, and I admit I shake my head. It's the back to the future sort of trend of this highly verticalized company that feels a lot like the mini-computer companies of the 1970s, and sort of the structure that's expected where everything will be purchased from one vendor," said Muglia in a transcript of his conversation with Goldman's Sarah Friar and then audience Q&A.
"I don't believe that's what customers will want in a long-term perspective. I think that customers want to have the ability to have choice at different layers of the stack and the horizontal nature of the computing industry that's emerged over the last 20 years, I think there's still some major fundamental dynamics that make that incredibly interesting for customers to be able to choose their hardware vendor, to choose their software operating system supplier, to choose their applications from different vendors, and ensure that they're able to get best of breed associated with those things."
Now, I wasn't able to attend the event itself, so I can't say whether Muglia had a straight face when he was laying down those lines about how he (and I would assume, by extension, Microsoft) believes it is "incredibly interesting for customers to be able to choose . . . their software operating systems supplier."
Yes indeed—over the past two decades that Muglia's been at Microsoft, if there's any company that's been leading the charge for customers to have unfettered choice of operating systems, it's, uh, well . . . (do all those lawsuits and other anticompetitive really matter any more??), yeah, right, it's Microsoft, that longtime enabler of Linux and all other non-Windows operating systems.
So Muglia says Oracle's desire to offer optimized systems was a real head-shaker for him. And he had to shake his head even more when he mused about why the heck Oracle just doesn't kill Sparc and do what everybody else does and get in line for the Wintel x86 standard that has become an absolute industry standard because customers have so many options when picking which chips to use that, well, let's see, how can I put this . . . ahah! How about this: customers don't have to worry about wasting time having to pick from lots of choices because with Microsoft's help there are almost no other options.
Here—let Muglia explain it because he, after all, is the guy who finds it "incredibly interesting for customers to be able to choose" what components go into their stacks:
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?