Interop panel says the choice of a cloud-based productivity platform comes down to a lot more than just the per-user price.
Office 365 Vs. Google Apps: Top 10 Enterprise Concerns
(click image for larger view and forslideshow)
While Google and Microsoft have been duking it out in the press over Google Apps and Office 365, boasting about how this or that feature is superior to what its rival offers, the choice of platform for real-world organizations may come down to more fundamental considerations like size, budget, and even whether a social media strategy is in the business plan.
Office 365 and Google Apps offer similar upfront pricing, starting at about $5 or $6 per user, per month. But there's much more to consider, according to panelists who spoke Wednesday at a session at the Interop technology conference and expo, a UBM TechWeb event in New York City.
For large organizations that have built up a trove of documents in Microsoft Word over the years, the choice is a no-brainer, according to Kevin Kieller, principal at consulting firm EnableUC. "Most organizations already have a large investment in Office documents," said Kieller.
That fact alone, he said, will steer most large companies to Office 365, which boasts better (though not perfect) fidelity when rendering documents created in the desktop version of Word than what Google Apps offers. "Your documents are going to change" when uploaded to Google, Kieller warned.
For smaller or less formal organizations, however, the fidelity issue might not be seen as a major problem. "I know of a lot of organizations that are trying to eliminate the desktop altogether," said Dave Michels, president of Verge1 Consulting, who also spoke at the session.
Another issue that could influence the decision to choose Microsoft or Google's online productivity platform is the extent to which an organization plans to use all of the included features. With an online version of SharePoint, Microsoft's collaboration platform, Office 365 is decidedly richer than Google Apps. But it can also be expensive to use and integrate with onsite data. "SharePoint is a beast; it's complicated," said Michels.
Added Kieller: "There are some big ticket dollars associated with moving to SharePoint" in the cloud.
So for organizations that just need rudimentary online collaboration tools, Google Docs and Google Groups may be the way to go. But again, it's not that simple. Another factor is the extent to which an organization needs to safeguard user data and user privacy.
Both Google Apps and Office 365 offer a number of solid security features, but philosophically Google may be more disposed to seek access to its users' data. "Google wants your information," said Michels, who noted that the search giant's business is built mostly around monetizing customer data through advertising and third-party marketing programs.
Social media is also a consideration. To the extent that a company wants its employees to interact with each other through the cloud, Google may have the advantage. The company recently launched its Google+ social networking service, and is integrating the platform with its Apps environment. Office 365 also offers a form of social networking through Lync, but it's a less intuitive environment.
Google+ also extends to the whole Internet, although that might not sit well with security-conscious IT departments. "They may not see that as a plus," said Kieller.
The bottom line, according to the panelists, is that the choice of Google Apps or Office 365 does not lend itself to simple "right" or "wrong" answers.
Top IT Trends to Watch in Financial ServicesIT pros at banks, investment houses, insurance companies, and other financial services organizations are focused on a range of issues, from peer-to-peer lending to cybersecurity to performance, agility, and compliance. It all matters.
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of October 9, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."