Government // Mobile & Wireless
News
11/1/2012
02:30 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions

Updated Google Search App for iOS is a viable alternative to Apple's Siri.

iPad Mini Tablet: Visual Tour
iPad Mini Tablet: Visual Tour
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Google has updated its search app for iPhone and iPad, and based on a limited set of comparable queries, the updated software matches or exceeds Siri, Apple's voice search software of recent model iOS devices.

Version 2.5 of Google Search App answers questions more effectively than its predecessor, thanks to integration with Google's Knowledge Graph, the company's system for assessing the meanings of queries and for associating related facts.

Google's technical improvements in speech recognition are due to the massive amount of anonymized search query data it collects, and to data available on the open Web. Google research scientist Ciprian Chelba notes in a blog post that the company's speech recognition error rate declines as the amount of data available for analysis rises.

I compared Google Search App to Apple's Siri on an iPhone 4S, over Wi-Fi and AT&T 4G, by asking the same query to each. More often than not, both provided useful results. Google's app performed noticeably faster than Siri in several instances. However, Siri's presentation of data was often more appealing.

[ What does Apple need to do? Read Apple's Exec Shakeup: 10 Necessary Fixes. ]

Query: Who let the dogs out?

Google Search App returned a list of appropriate YouTube videos, atop search results list. Siri made a joke of it, returning spoken and text answer: "Who? Who? Who? Who? Who?"

Score one for Google on accuracy. Score one for Siri on humor.

Query: Where is Paris?

Google Search App returned the spoken answer, "Here is a map of Paris, France." It also showed the map on the phone, atop search links to Wikipedia and Ask.com. Siri returned the spoken and written answer, "Here's Paris," and presented an Apple map.

In this instance, Siri was just as responsive as Google.

Query: Tell me about the Giants.

Google Search App presented its baseball score data from the recent World Series, followed by the usual search results list. Siri offered the spoken and written response, "searching the Web for 'the giants,'" then performed a search using Google.

Siri's results were exactly what the Google Search App had come up with. Why ask Siri when Siri just asks Google?

Query: Show me the closest cafe.

Google Search App responded by voice, "There are several listings for 'cafe' less than a mile away." The app browser page contained a local map topped by a list of nearby cafes, most with the word 'cafe' in their names, along with click-to-call, directions, and website buttons on each listing. Siri responded with the spoken and text answer, "I've found fifteen cafe restaurants fairly close to you. I've sorted them by distance."

Siri's listing was formatted more attractively than Google's, but lacked actionable elements like a click-to-call phone number on the listing page -- tapping on a listing opened a restaurant-specific information card that contained a phone number and website. Neither Siri nor Google took the query literally and returned the one closest cafe. And both failed to return the cafe that was actually closest to me at the time of my query in their respective lists.

Query: What movies are playing nearby?

Google Search App responded by saying, "Movies playing in San Francisco," and presented a scrollable gallery of movie posters with show times at nearby theaters below. Siri responded by saying "I'm looking for movies," followed by "I found quite a number of movies playing nearby today" and an attractively formatted listing designed with a movie marquee motif.

Siri's two-step response was slower than Google's, but the Siri layout was better organized.

Query: What's the price of Google's/Apple's stock?

Google Search App responded by saying the current price of Google's stock and presenting an info card with lots of useful financial information. Asked when the market was closed, Google's software reported after-hours trading. Siri responded just as Google's app did, by reciting the current Apple stock price and presenting a Yahoo Finance chart.

Google did better in this instance. Siri said nothing about after-hours trading and its Yahoo-supplied chart was not interactive like Google's. Tapping on Siri's chart launched the Yahoo-powered iOS Stocks app.

Query: Play the trailer for "The Hobbit."

Google Search App quickly loaded the trailer for the upcoming movie "The Hobbit" at the top of a Web search listing and then opened a separate YouTube tab to start playing the video. Siri responded by asking "which one?" and then listing the "The Hobbit" (2012), its 2013 sequel -- which doesn't yet have an official trailer -- and the 1977 animated version.

Siri deserves credit for realizing there's more than one version of "The Hobbit," but shouldn't have included next year's sequel. Google showed more sense by guessing what I meant.

Query: How do you say "help" in Spanish?

Google Search App responded by saying, "Here is your translation," and then presenting an information card with the word "ayudar." Siri responded, "Let me check that" and then said "I found this," and presented a Wolfram Alpha-supplied page that correctly assessed the question and returned "ayuda" along with a variety of synonyms and related words like "recursos,"evitar" and "asistir." The skeuomorphic design of the page was oddly retro, with the page mocked up to include vertical lines of dot-matrix printer holes.

Siri's answer was more complete, but wasn't served as quickly as Google's. I was surprised that both Apple's and Google's software converted my spoken questions into text with 100% accuracy.

Overall, Siri has an edge on the iPhone because Siri can be launched simply by holding the home button. That process is likely to be quicker than entering a phone passcode and scrolling to the Google Search App to open it.

However, once Google's app is accessible, I found it to be more responsive. Also, I prefer Google's synthesized voice to Siri's. Google's presentation of information could use some improvement.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CadronBoy
50%
50%
CadronBoy,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2012 | 7:57:44 PM
re: Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions
This article was really only comparing SEARCH features as a comparison between the two voice recognition systems. Obviously Google is making up ground fast to even be considered on par -- if not perhaps better -- than Siri with respect to search features. For those who need a more expanded level of "speech recognition" you might look to products provided by Vlingo, Nuance, or the infamous "Jelly Bean" -- in this way you can send those e-mails, tweet something, whatever.... Comparing the two systems as you have is like comparing apples to oranges -- this comparison solely focused on the SEARCH features. I am certain there are comparisons between Siri and Jelly Bean or Dragon Natural or... that would offer you the type of comparison that you seek.
CadronBoy
50%
50%
CadronBoy,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2012 | 7:44:53 PM
re: Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions
No -- Google went right to the trailer for the "The Hobbit" -- unlike Siri, Google made no attempt to display a trailer which has not yet been released -- that is, the sequel to "The Hobbit". A little misleading perhaps, but no inconsistencies here.
jasonscott
50%
50%
jasonscott,
User Rank: Strategist
11/2/2012 | 5:35:29 PM
re: Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions
I'm sorry, but Google Search is NOT a viable alternative to Siri, except in one area: search.

Search is all that Google Search does. It's a one-trick pony.

Siri, on the other hand, is an extremely helpful digital assistant for a myriad of daily activities:

Ask Google Search to add an event to your calendar. Ooops. Sorry, it doesn't do that.
How about taking a memo for you? Oh, Google Search doesn't do that, either.
Or send a text to Mom? Again, Google Search can't help you.
Place a call? No again, for Google Search.
Tweet something?
Post something on Facebook?
Make a dinner reservation?
Open your Photos?
Play some music?
Remind you of something?
Send an email?
Wake you up at a certain time?
Check someone's address in your address book?
Locate a friend?
None of those are handled by Google Search. Not one. But Siri handles them all and she does it quite well. And that's important when you're in the car and need to get stuff done but can't type or take your eyes off the road. It's even helpful when you're just sitting at your desk doing work and need Siri to take care of something else for you so you can keep working.

I agree that Google Search does search very well. That's no surprise, since that's Google's focus and where it makes it's money. But in no other way does it replace Siri. And since Siri can present the same search results as Google -- even if it does take a couple seconds longer -- it's far easier to just stick with one digital assistant.
mrbofus
50%
50%
mrbofus,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2012 | 7:13:53 AM
re: Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions
"Siri deserves credit for realizing there's more than one version of "The Hobbit," but shouldn't have included next year's sequel. Google showed more sense by guessing what I meant."

Huh? You say Siri shouldn't have included next year's sequel, but you also say, "Google Search App quickly loaded the trailer for the upcoming movie "The Hobbit"," so Google did the exact thing you said Siri shouldn't have done. So how did Google show more sense? Or why shouldn't have Siri included next year's sequel?
InfamousLP
50%
50%
InfamousLP,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2012 | 6:22:18 AM
re: Google Search App Vs. Apple Siri: 8 Questions
to use google search hold the search button (magnifying glass) it automatically comes up. this guy is an apple drone. your argument against the google search for being less accessible is user inexperience.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.