Notify The Next Of Kin - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Applications
Commentary
6/30/2010
10:27 PM
Dave Methvin
Dave Methvin
Commentary
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Faster, More Effective Response With Threat Intelligence & Orchestration Playboo
Aug 31, 2017
Finding ways to increase speed, accuracy, and efficiency when responding to threats should be the ...Read More>>

Notify The Next Of Kin

There's a business strategy for new products that goes by the name of "fail fast, fail cheap". Perhaps that's the reason that Microsoft is pulling the plug on its Kin phones after just two months and one desperate price cut. But they didn't fail fast, and I doubt Kin's failure will be cheap.

There's a business strategy for new products that goes by the name of "fail fast, fail cheap". Perhaps that's the reason that Microsoft is pulling the plug on its Kin phones after just two months and one desperate price cut. But they didn't fail fast, and I doubt Kin's failure will be cheap.Remember that the Kin was a result of Microsoft's 2008 acquisition of Danger, the makers of the once-popular Sidekick phone. Two and a half years later, the Kin made it out Microsoft's door. Perhaps Kin would have worked in February 2008, when Microsoft bought Danger. But the iPhone and Android have showed that phones could be an incredible mobile platform. The Kin seems to have been built as a "better Sidekick" and that isn't something people want in 2010. At the point the Kin was released, Apple was blowing out the 3GS at $99. Verizon's monthly plans priced the Kin like a smartphone, but it's not a smartphone. Why not buy the real thing?

If you start the clock at the aquisition of Danger back in 2008, it took Microsoft more than two years to deliver its failure. In that same period of time, Apple and Android have delivered several generations of useful and functional devices. So although Microsoft pulled the plug quickly on Kin once they realized its failure, they wasted two years; that's not failing fast.

So let's look at the "fail cheap" angle. Microsoft didn't reveal the price it paid for the privately-held Danger, but it was rumored to be $500 million. Then there was the cost of the two-year-long development effort, which at this point seems like a total loss of both money and opportunity. In the post I linked to above, note the final sentence: "Given that there are a couple of devices already on the market that use Danger software (unlike Android's prototypes), Microsoft might actually be able to get some disgruntled Android developers switching to its platform." Oh, the false optimism of 2008.

Microsoft's death notice for Kin puts the best possible face on the fiasco, saying that it was integrating the Kin team into the Windows Phone 7 team. Let's hope they learned enough about what they did wrong to prevent Windows Phone 7 from becoming the next of Kin.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll