Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
1/17/2012
08:00 AM
Doug Henschen
Doug Henschen
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps

Strong results at SAP, Epicor and Infor present a sharp contrast to Oracle's lagging quarterly sales.

The results are in from most of the top names in on-premises ERP software, and the results are clear: SAP is leading, Infor and Epicor are doing well, but Oracle is lagging big time.

SAP on Friday released preliminary numbers for its fourth quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011, that showed software revenue increased 16% over the year-earlier period (17% in constant currencies) to 1.74 billion Euros ($2.2 billion). Software and software-related services revenue were up 12% over Q4 2010 to 3.72 billion euros ($4.7 billion), handily beating analyst's estimates of 3.6 billion Euros.

By contrast, Oracle's software sales for its fiscal second quarter ended Nov. 30 were up just 2% compared with the year-earlier quarter, whereas analysts expected at least a 7% increase.

The contrast is even sharper if you separate software revenues by type. Oracle's new-license revenues for databases and middleware were up 4% while applications revenue--primarily ERP and CRM--actually declined by 2%. Oracle blamed the overall shortfall on purchase delays tied to new internal approval requirements at customer firms.

[ Trying to understand the social enterprise? Read What Enterprise Social Success Stories Have In Common. ]

In a statement, SAP claimed "significant" market share gains and declared "our innovation strategy is winning."

Backing up the innovation claim, SAP said sales of Hana, the company's in-memory appliance for real-time analytics exceeded its 100 million euro ($127 million) 2011 sales target by generating more than 160 million euros ($202 million) in sales.

SAP was not alone in reporting robust enterprise application revenues. Epicor on Thursday issued a preliminary report that software revenues increased in the range of 8% to 10% during the three-month period ended Dec. 31 (its first fiscal quarter). Total revenue for the quarter is expected to be $218 million to $219 million, up 4% to 5%.

Private equity firm Apax Partners acquired and merged Epicor Software and Activant Solutions last year to create a larger ERP and retail software vendor under the Epicor name. The firm's annual revenues are likely to exceed $800 million in 2012. The Q1 estimate of an 8% to 10% increase was for organic growth over and above the combined results of the two formerly separate companies.

Infor reported earlier this month that its software license revenue grew 16% over the year-earlier period in its second fiscal quarter ended Nov. 30, the same time period in which Oracle suffered a 2% decline. Infor acquired Lawson Software last year and is now the third largest ERP vendor after SAP and Oracle, with revenues expected to exceed $2.5 billion. The 16% increase at Infor did not include results from Lawson.

Microsoft is estimated to fall between Infor and Epicor in enterprise apps revenue, but the software giant does not break out financial details of its comparatively small Microsoft Dynamics business.

So with SAP and Infor posting double-digit gains and Epicor verging on that territory in its most recent quarter, what's the matter with Oracle? As I wrote earlier this month, Oracle customers may be suffering from what Nomura equities analyst Rick Sherlund dubbed "Fusion confusion," a reference to the new Fusion application suite Oracle rolled out in 2011.

"Contacts tell us that Fusion may be freezing Oracle out of the final stages of some apps deals as customers resist buying the old product but are not convinced the new Fusion suite is ready for prime time," Sherlund told StreetInsider.com .

Oracle portrays Fusion as its long-term replacement for Oracle E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft and JD Edwards ERP systems, and Oracle and Siebel CRM systems. The Fusion Suite is designed to be delivered as a service from the cloud or run on premises. But Oracle is not heavily promoting Fusion. Instead, Oracle is trying to get people to ease in pieces of Fusion with what it calls a "co-existence strategy and architecture" for Oracle E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards and Siebel apps, and Fusion.

In the case of PeopleSoft, for example, Oracle suggests the combination of PeopleSoft's financial and human capital management software with Fusion Talent Management. PeopleSoft also offers talent management capabilities, but they were only recently introduced, so customers might want to jump directly to the cloud-deliverable Fusion version of that application.

The coexistence strategy surely appeals to customers that want to avoid the chaos of rip-and-replace software deployments. But it also presents the dilemma of when to choose stability and when to opt for Fusion features including services-based delivery, role-based interfaces and embedded business intelligence.

Oracle and SAP are both selling the same idea: Keep the legacy core of software we've sold you, and buy our innovative new software that goes with it. SAP calls it "innovation on top of a stable core." The core is the single application code base of Business Suite 7, which SAP has committed to support with maintenance through 2020. In the latest quarter at least, it appears SAP's brand of innovation is winning.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CHoms210
50%
50%
CHoms210,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/20/2012 | 1:03:38 PM
re: SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps
Code base of course, not code line. But if you seriously think that additional code bases only occur when one vendor acquires another, you're sadly mistaken. Q.E.D.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
1/19/2012 | 3:14:38 PM
re: SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps
I wrote "code base," not "code line." Yes, SAP has acquired BusinessObjects and peripheral bits and pieces here and there -- taking three years, in the case of performance management apps, for example, to consolidate acquired assets into one product. But the vast majority of SAP's app development has been organic around NetWeaver. That's a big contrast with the many major applicaitons -- Agile, ATG, Endeca, Hyperion, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, Primavera, Oracle E-Business Suite, Retek, RightNow, Siebel -- acquired or built by Oracle and now loosely taped together with middleware. -- Doug Henschen
Guest
50%
50%
Guest,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/19/2012 | 2:05:07 AM
re: SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps
I have never heard a SAP customer say it has "the highest TCO" in the industry. I have heard Oracle say that about SAP many times, always unsubstantiated. Your claims about SAP requiring "multiple sources of truth, many BWs, etc" are ludicrous. If they occur, they are the result of poor implementation and architectural design. They are not more common in SAP than Oracle's menagerie of acquired applications. IBM has better BI reporting/analytics and MDM tools than either company.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
1/19/2012 | 12:26:55 AM
re: SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps
I wrote "code base," not "code line." Yes, SAP has acquired BusinessObjects and other companies along the way--spending three years, in the case of enterprise performance management apps, roconciling multiple acquired products into a single EPM product. But most of SAP's apps development has been organic, with development around NetWeaver. That's a big contrast with Oracle, which has -- as you can see here http://www.oracle.com/us/corpo... -- dozens of code bases.-- Doug Henschen
CHoms210
50%
50%
CHoms210,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/18/2012 | 8:53:54 PM
re: SAP Leads, Oracle Lags In Enterprise Apps
Perhaps you should actually try to figure out what SAP's architecture is really all about instead of reading their web site and marketing brochures and listening to their earnings calls. SAP a single code base? Get real. Why do you think SAP's customers complain about the highest TCO in the industry? It has at least a dozen code bases, making it extremely cumbersome to handle and impossible to report from, which is why SAP customers need (more than one) datawarehouse to do reporting and analysis, creating a second (and third) version of the truth. Perhaps you should write about something you actually understand.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July10, 2014
When selecting servers to support analytics, consider data center capacity, storage, and computational intensity.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join InformationWeek’s Lorna Garey and Mike Healey, president of Yeoman Technology Group, an engineering and research firm focused on maximizing technology investments, to discuss the right way to go digital.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.