InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology

InformationWeek: The Business Value of Technology
Valley View - Register Now
AuthorITies: The
Observer

December 7, 1998

The Earth Moved: The AOL-Netscape-Sun Deal

By Lou Bertin

I t may not qualify as Microsoft's worst nightmare, but the alliance involving America Online, Sun Microsystems, and Netscape surely has to be causing some sleepless nights in Redmond.

The reasons why Microsoft is--or should be--more than a little concerned are, at once, profoundly simple and tantalizingly complex.

First the simple stuff: All three companies have proven themselves very good at what they do. In AOL's case, that's the creation, cultivation, and nurturing of a never-before-seen bloc of consumers that's growing daily. In Netscape's case, it's the creation of browser technology that's the envy of mass-marketers. (Do we need evidence of that beyond Microsoft's apparent fear of Netscape?) In Sun's case, it's the company's ability to thrive in a cut-throat business by providing customers superb technology, superb service, and--according to anecdotes I've heard from a cross section of InformationWeek readers--a true sense of partnership with its customer base.

Put those elements together, stir vigorously, and what do you have? Via Netscape, AOL gets access to advanced Web technology--technology AOL badly needs and Netscape never would have had the resources to market properly. Via Sun, AOL basks in reflected credibility among business customers it wasn't able to attract on its own. And make no mistake that access to commercial customers is critical to AOL being able to meet its ambitious goals for future growth.

AOL also obtains (likely at a significantly discounted price) backbone server technology that has been long overdue and is necessary if AOL is to succeed. After all, what good is the ability to support 600,000 simultaneous users if you've got 20 million people lined up? From Sun's perspective, a company that bills itself as being "the dot in dot com" doesn't do itself any favors if there's nothing under Sun's aegis that specifically addresses Web access and content, and not merely Web technology.

On that level at least, the deal amounts to a classic "win, win, win" scenario for all concerned.

One of the criticisms of the AOL-Netscape-Sun alliance is that the cultures of the three organizations are too diverse to work well in concert. Indeed, in the case of AOL and Netscape, the divergence of opinions I saw when visiting various chat rooms in the days following the deal was closer to open warfare than mere cultural differences.

All that aside, I am convinced the deal will work simply because all three parties have so much at stake. Putting their individual concerns aside, the three have collectively created an opportunity to prove a point each has made separately, namely that Microsoft's doings have stifled rather than enhanced the availability of advanced technology.

That philosophic inducement is, I believe, as powerful a motivator as numbers on a balance sheet, particularly when one is dealing with the likes of Messrs. Case, McNealy, and Barksdale, none of whom suffer from any apparent lack of self-esteem and none of whom have been particular fans of one William H. Gates.

There are times when issues do become personal, all the more intensely so among titans. This isn't to suggest that the deal they struck was motivated solely by personal considerations or some sort of vendetta against Microsoft. It is to say that Case, McNealy, and Barksdale have superb reasons to do everything in their considerable powers to have their employees focus not on the differences among the alliance members but to instead focus their considerable talents on their common foe.

Six months ago, a deal among AOL, Sun, and Netscape would have seemed so far-fetched as to be almost unthinkable. Somehow, though, the tectonic plates that support each of the three companies shifted to make this alliance possible. And, as even amateur geologists (or residents in earthquake-prone geographies) can tell you, the movement of tectonic plates is constant, but under the proper circumstances, causes colossal amounts of energy to be released.

Such, I think, will be the case here with the only difference being that the energy released will be of the creative and not of the destructive sort. So it is when once unlikely, once unthinkable changes occur, and when the issues at hand become decidedly personal to the principals involved.

If nothing else, it's going to be fun to watch.

Happy holidays!

For more news and analysis on the AOL-Netscape-Sun deal, read "Three-Part Harmony?"


AuthorITies Archive

Send Us Your Feedback

Top of the Page

Karyl Scott:
Enterprise View
Karyl will explore the business and technology issues surrounding enterprise systems.



Stuart J. Johnston:
Redmond Watch
As our eyes and ears in Redmond, Stuart gives his perspective on the latest events at Microsoft.



Jason Levitt:
Internet Zone
Jason focuses on the strange, egregious, and the standard technologies of the intranet/Internet.



Charles Pelton:
Eye On IT
Charles explores IT management issues and strategies that business and technology managers must face.

Get InformationWeek Daily

Don't miss each day's hottest technology news, sent directly to your inbox, including occasional breaking news alerts.

Sign up for the InformationWeek Daily email newsletter

*Required field

Privacy Statement



This Week's Issue

Current Healthcare Issue

In this issue:
  • InformationWeek Healthcare CIO 25: Our second annual honor roll of the health IT leaders driving healthcare's transformation.
  • EHR Unreadiness: Only a small percentage of physicians planning to apply for Meaningful Use funds have e-health record systems capable of achieving most of the requirements. .
  • And much more!
  • Read the Current Issue

Related Whitepapers

Related Reports

Related Webcasts






Video