InformationWeek Stories by George Ouhttp://www.informationweek.comInformationWeeken-usCopyright 2012, UBM LLC.2013-04-11T10:33:00ZWhy PC Sales Are In Free FallMicrosoft's hardware and software strategies for Windows 8 have been miserable failures so far. A rumored 7-inch Surface is one avenue for them to turn the tidehttp://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/why-pc-sales-are-in-free-fall/240152724?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>The latest IDC report has some alarming news for Microsoft and the PC industry. <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887324695104578414973888155516-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwMDExNDAyWj.html">Personal Computer sales are in free fall</a> due to lack of hardware and software innovation. Not only has Microsoft Windows 8 failed to save the PC industry, the hated operating system (OS) has actually harmed PC sales. The PC industry has its share of blame with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-8-tablet-launch-fail/240145401">the failed tablet launch</a>.</p> <P> <p>First we had Microsoft's misguided Windows RT and Surface tablets strategy. When <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/why-microsofts-new-surface-tablets-will/240002303">I warned these products were failures</a>, I got flak from Microsoft defenders that the products haven't even launched and that I couldn't possibly judge so soon. But my assessments were based on fundamental flaws in the products. Windows RT was a version of Windows that couldn't run existing Windows Applications. It also hinged on a nascent Windows Modern UI (formerly "Metro") App Store that is still struggling for relevance half a year after Windows 8 launch.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-April/surface-in-decline.jpg" /> <P> <p>The Surface tablet based on the NVIDIA Tegra 3 and Windows RT was supposed to offer superior battery life to an Intel based tablet as a concession prize for the lack of Windows application support, but it ended up being <a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6529/busting-the-x86-power-myth-indepth-clover-trail-power-analysis">less battery efficient</a> and lower performance than Intel tablets. Despite having inferior specifications to the iPad 2 and third and fourth generation iPad, Microsoft had the nerve to ask for a higher price and higher profit margin than Apple. Not surprisingly, Surface sales are embarrassing. As for the "Pro" version of the Surface Tablet, my predictions about its poor battery life were accurate because Microsoft used a notebook processor that was never designed to have the battery life necessary for a tablet. Microsoft apparently never consulted Intel about hardware.</p> <P> <p>If the Windows RT fiasco wasn't bad enough, Microsoft even managed to make people hate Windows 8 despite its promising capability. A friend of mine said that Microsoft's slogan for Windows 8 should be "touch everywhere, even when inappropriate". Windows 8 is supposed to be optimized for tablets and the traditional PC but it runs neither hardware platforms well. On the PC desktop or notebook side where touch isn't enabled, Microsoft forces users to use a touch optimized user interface.</p> <P> <p>On Windows 8 tablet devices, basic functionality still doesn't work 6 months after the OS launched. Modern Apps can't easily see additional storage volumes like the MicroSD card. You have to resort to some crazy hack like mounting an NTFS storage volume into a folder which can cause problems when you try to image the file system for backup.</p> <P> <p>If things weren't bad enough with Microsoft stealing all the media limelight with its failed Surface tablets and a poorly designed Windows 8 OS, the PC industry made things worse by launching buggy and overpriced hardware. Device driver problems delayed Intel Clover Trail based Tablets by two months and the hardware was disappointing. Apple and Google were already releasing tablets for $499 and $399 with ultrahigh display resolutions of 2048x1536 and 2560x1600. The PC industry still believes it can sell tablets with 1366x768 resolution for $599-$799.</p> <P> <p>The PC industry is a classic example of an incumbent that got lazy and became obsolete. There was virtually zero competition 6 years ago when PC sales were riding high and Apple barely registered in computer market share. The PC industry could depend on Microsoft to produce bloated slowware like Windows Vista and a crapware induced bit rot to force people to upgrade to new PCs every few years even though there was nothing wrong with the actual hardware.</p> <P> <p>While PC display resolution froze and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD#Twisted_nematic_.28TN.29">TN LCD panels</a> with crappy viewing angles were the norm, smartphones and tablets pushed ahead with super wide viewing angles with ultrahigh resolution OLED and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD#In-Plane_Switching_.28IPS.29">IPS panels</a>. While the PC industry pushed UI response times to 15 seconds with bloated Java code, Apple and Google pushed UI response times down to sub 200 milliseconds.</p> <P> <p>It has never been clearer that the survival of the PC is in question and that time is running out. Windows 8 and the tablets that launched with it clearly failed to save the PC industry. What's needed is some genuine hardware innovation at a competitive price point. There's rumors of <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323741004578415661035812902.html">Microsoft working on a 7-inch tablet</a> which might help if it has competitive hardware specs with Google's Nexus 7 at a $199 price point. Google isn't standing still and there's a good chance that we'll see another generation of a hot new Android tablet before Microsoft launches.</p> <P> <p>We will likely be seeing touch-enabled Intel Haswell-based Ultrabooks with Windows 8.1 (code named "Blue") by the fall of 2013 with a starting price of $599. Since Haswell will have always-on tablet-like battery life, Microsoft needs to deliver a much improved experience with Windows 8.1. This will help slow or halt the decline of notebook sales but Microsoft still needs a solid Windows 8.1 tablet solution.</p> <P> <p>Microsoft and/or the PC makers need to produce an ultrahigh resolution tablet with a starting price of $399 running Windows 8.1 "Blue". To help hit these prices, they need to emulate the strategy of Apple and Google by adopting the no storage expansion strategy unless users buy a $150 battery/keyboard dock. They could also use a Windows 8.1 7" or 8" tablet with 1080P resolution for $299.</p> <P> <p>If the PC makers won't deliver something like this, Microsoft should try to emulate Google's Nexus strategy. Microsoft would set hardware requirements and pricing and ask a PC maker to step up to the plate. The winning bid would get Microsoft's backing on branding and advertising. There's still plenty of money to be made with hardware accessories and the overall profit margins will be better than the typical sub $400 PC notebook. If Microsoft wants to be relevant in the tablet space, this is their only hope.</p>2013-03-20T10:00:00ZUnlocked Android Smartphones Will Free ConsumersLocked smartphones can only compete when subsidized by carriers. Low cost unlocked Android phones from Google and smaller companies will break that model.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/unlocked-android-smartphones-will-free-c/240151149?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>The 9.7-inch iPad <a target="_blank" href="http://www.isuppli.com/Teardowns/News/pages/New-iPad-32-GB-4G-Carries-364-35-Bill-of-Materials.aspx">costs Apple $316 to make</a> and sells for $499. The 4-inch iPhone <a target="_blank" href="http://www.isuppli.com/Teardowns/News/pages/iPhone5-Carries-$199-BOM-Virtual-Teardown-Reveals.aspx">costs Apple $207 to make</a> and sells for $649. Yet, most consumers buy iPhones and other overpriced smartphones like hotcakes because they pay a little upfront while mortgaging the next two years with an expensive smartphone contract. That's starting to change with the arrival of the Google Nexus 4 and companies like Blu Products <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/18/4100006/why-blu-products-can-beat-samsung">selling premium smartphones</a> that traditionally cost $600 for less than half the price.</p> <P> <p>I bought the Nexus 4 smartphone (16 GB model $349) last November even though it took three weeks to get it. The demand was so high that it took six weeks for my friend to get his $299 8 GB model even though he was ordering from the second batch after Google already knew about the heavy demand from the initial orders. It doesn't take a PhD Economist to know that selling a product at half the traditional price is going to generate exceedingly high demand, but it still took Google many months to meet demands.</p> <P> <p>You also don't need to be a mathematician to figure out that buying a smartphone with a low entry price and a two-year contract will cost hundreds of dollars more over the life of the contract, yet the vast majority of U.S. consumers buy contract phones. Economists have tried to explain how subsidies nullify price sensitivity and many articles have been touting the benefits of unlocked phones till they were blue in the face, but nobody listened because of unlocked smartphone sticker shock. As soon as people see a $650 or $850 price tag, the thought of saving a few hundred dollars over two years goes out the window.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote>BYTE recently ran a special report on unlocked phones. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/unlocked-phones-how-and-why-to-do-it/240150147">Click here to read why you would want one, how to buy it and how to activate it.</a></b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <p>The subsidized smartphone game has been a great racket for the smartphone makers so long as everybody played along, but that might be coming to an end as companies like Google and Blu Products start offering very nice smartphones at half price.</p> <P> <img alt="Blu Products Life View Smartphone" title="Blu Products Life View Smartphone" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-March/Blu-life-view-android-phone.jpg" /> <P> <p>The Google Nexus 4 was a great start and we'll probably soon see a larger Nexus smartphone with full 1080P display. Smaller manufacturers like <a target="_blank" href="http://bluproducts.com/">Blu Products</a> will launch the Blu Life View smartphone with a 5.7-inch display for $299. The resolution of the Life View hasn't been officially specified but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gsmarena.com/blu_life_view-5360.php">GSMArena lists it at 1280 x 720</a>. That's not full 1080P but it's still higher than the iPhone 5 and it's less than half the price of competing products.</p> <P> <p>Once people realize they can get a great smartphone for around $300 (which isn't much higher than the upfront cost of a contract smartphone), that could spell the end of the high margin subsidized smartphone business model. That would mean eroding profit margins for smartphone makers and fewer locked in smartphone customers for the cellular carriers. That might be bad news for Samsung and Apple, but I for one, welcome our new unlocked smartphone overlords.</p>2013-02-01T07:00:00ZLogitech Keyboard and Camera for Cisco JabberEnterprises implementing UC (Unified Communications) using Cisco Jabber will get some value out of the Logitech UC Solution for Cisco 725-C, but not it's not a complete client-end solution. The package bundles a slick keyboard designed for Jabber, a high-end webcam and, oddly, a mouse. Adding speakers and a headset would have made it more valuable.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/desktop-pc/logitech-keyboard-and-camera-for-cisco-j/240147587?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Logitech just launched the "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/uc725c?crid=655">Logitech UC Solution for Cisco 725-C</a>" ($269.99 MSRP), an enterprise software-based voice and video communications solution designed for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cisco.com/web/products/voice/jabber.html">Cisco Jabber</a>, an enterprise collaboration tool.</p> <P> <p>The Logitech package bundles a keyboard, mouse, and the Logitech C920-C webcam ($109.99 if purchased separately). The camera uses the same image sensor as the Logitech ConferenceCam BCC950, which tested very favorably in <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/digital-video/logitech-conferencecam-bcc950-easy-quali/240002036">my review and my tests of the C920</a> reveal a similarly competent webcam.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/unified-communications-bundle-620.jpg" /> <P> <p>The keyboard has the same buttons and LED display found on Cisco's VoIP phones and even matches the color. It has a voicemail button, video mute, microphone mute, call hold, call answer, and volume controls.</p> <P> <center><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/keyboard-buttons-500.jpg" /></center> <P> <p>You can see how these buttons work in Logitech's video.</p> <P> <iframe width="620" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jWhcaVbHfms" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <P> <p>So far I'm impressed by the camera and keyboard, but I'm perplexed by the inclusion of a mouse rather than speakers and headset, both of which Logitech makes. For a $270 hardware solution that is supposed to enable software unified communications, I want a comprehensive solution that lets me use those nifty buttons and features shown in Logitech's video. The C920 already has a decent microphone so that's covered. But for a drop-in solution, the mouse is optional but speakers and a headset is a must.</p> <P> <p>For now, Logitech's Unified Communications bundle seems to be incomplete and bundling the wrong hardware. It may still be a viable product if customers are willing to buy the headphone and speakers separately, but it would have a better shot at adoption if it came bundled with the right hardware.</p> <P> <p><b>Update:</b> Logitech responded with the following statement in reaction to this story:<blockquote><i>Logitech strongly believes that customers don't want a bundled audio solution but would rather select a USB headset or USB speakerphone that best meets the needs of each individual user. From Logitech's understanding of its customers and the market, "one size fits all" does not apply to headsets, which are a personal choice.</i></blockquote></p> <P>2013-01-08T08:30:00ZIntel Haswell: $599 Touch Ultrabooks In 2013The PC industry used to taunt Apple about their price premium but now the joke is on them: The first crop of Windows 8 tablets and hybrids are overpriced and under-featured. But Intel seems to have the right idea on saving the PC industry. They are pushing Ultrabooks to the $599 price point with mandatory touch capability by the end of 2013.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/intel-haswell-599-touch-ultrabooks-in-20/240145717?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Intel seems to have the right idea for saving the PC industry. The microprocessor giant is pushing Ultrabooks to the <a target="_blank" href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/01/07/intel-by-the-end-of-2013-well-see-599-touch-enabled-ultrabooks/">$599 price point with mandatory touch capability</a> by the end of 2013.</p> <P> <p>This shows that Intel is serious about making touch a mainstream option in PCs. Multitouch sensors are essentially a $40 component that was traditionally sold as a $400 premium feature in higher-end notebooks, but only a tiny percent of PCs to date have shipped with touch screens. By making it mandatory across the board, the retail price markup is brought closer in line with the actual cost of the component. With features like touch and always-on capability in the fourth-generation ultrabook, and an attractive $599 price point, the PC is far less likely to cede market share to tablets.</p> <P> <p>Last week I pointed out <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-8-tablet-launch-fail/240145401">the failed launch of Windows 8 tablets</a> and it looks like Vizio is following in the same footsteps with <a target="_blank" href="http://store.vizio.com/news/vizio-introduces-tablet-pc-featuring-windows-8">their 11.6" AMD Z-60 based Windows 8 tablet</a>. The AMD Z-60 has low CPU performance and lacks always-on and it's too heavy at 1.8 pounds. The Samsung 11.6" ATIV 500T tablet by comparison weighs 1.4 pounds. The reason for this is that the AMD processor requires a much larger battery.</p> <P> <p>Samsung's 11.6" tablet is much lighter because Intel's Clover Trail "Atom" processor has always-on capability and is far more energy efficient. There are heavier Intel-based tablets based on the company's Ivy Bridge "Core" processor which also lack always-on and battery efficiency, but Ivy Bridge was designed for higher end notebooks or "Ultrabooks" with their much faster CPU and relatively fast GPU.</p> <P> <p>Still, all of these Windows tablets aren't close to being competitive with Apple's iPad 4 or Samsung's Nexus 10. Very few people will pay $800 for an Atom-based system or low end AMD performance. The PC industry used to taunt Apple about their price premium but now the joke is on them.</p> <P> <p>It's crucial that the PC industry hits the strategic $399, $499, $599, and $699 starting price points. $399 starting price for an Atom based system with a standard 1366x768 display would be price competitive. At $699 starting price for a Haswell-based system and a retina class display, the unit would be competitive. The PC industry also needs to forget about 1080P displays because it makes the icons and text in Windows 8 too small. They need to match the MacBook pro with Retina display so that pixel doubling can be employed. That means 2560x1600 emulating 1280x800 so that icons and other GUI elements that have not been optimized for a 2560x1600 display still look decent and remain the same size.</p> <P> <p>Some people will say I'm expecting too much for $699 but the Nexus 10 offers 2560x1600 resolution at the $399 price point. This is what consumers have come to expect and this is the new marketplace reality. Companies can always sell higher end versions with higher clocked processors, more storage, and more RAM at higher price points but they must have a good starting price that's competitive with iPad and Android.</p> <P> <p>Intel just announced at CES a more energy efficient Ivy Bridge chip with <a target="_blank" href="http://gizmodo.com/5973896">7 watt TDP (Thermal Design Power)</a> and a faster Atom processor. But what I'm really waiting for is Intel Haswell due later this year. Haswell offers high end performance of an Ultrabook and the always-on battery life and light weight form factor of a tablet. Intel also announced the Bay Trail "Atom" processor which is a 22nm quad-core chip succeeding the 32nm dual-core Clover Trail processor. Bay Trail will have twice the CPU performance of Clover Trail and it will further improve battery life. Bay Trail will also get a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/29/intel-bay-trail-roadmap-leaked/">significant GPU upgrade</a> because it will use the same graphics technology as Intel's Ivy Bridge processor used in high end notebooks, though Bay Trail will only have 4 execution units compared to 16 in Ivy Bridge.</p> <P> <p><blockquote>[<b>UPDATE</b> &#151; <i>According to ARS Technica <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/01/power-saving-through-marketing-intels-7-watt-ivy-bridge-cpus/">Intel is guilty of a little marketing trickery</a> by conflating some new average power consumption metric for peak thermal design power in the paragraph above. The so-called 7 watt TDP Ivy Bridge chip is actually a 13 watt TDP chip according to <a target="_blank" href="http://ark.intel.com/products/72013/Intel-Core-i5-3339Y-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_00-GHz">Intel's own specifications</a>. While 13 watt TDP is a big improvement for a notebook chip that used to run at 17 watt TDP, Intel should not be calling it a 7 watt TDP chip. This is as bad as AMD's "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1036385/amd-power-numbers-exposed">fake-o-watt</a>" marketing tricks several years ago. Intel's next generation Haswell chip is officially slated at 10 watt TDP which would make Haswell slightly too hot for normal-sized tablets, but Intel has already shown 8 watt versions of Haswell so the final TDP number for Haswell may end up low enough for an iPad- or Nexus-class product.</i>]</blockquote></p> <P> <p>Intel also appears to be hedging its bet on Android in case Windows tablets continues to disappoint. Unlike Clover Trail which only worked on Windows 8, Bay Bridge will also work on Android. This opens the possibility of an Intel Atom processor in some future main stream tablet like the Nexus 10 and maybe a Haswell chip in a high end tablet. Asus has already leaked out <a target="_blank" href="http://www.phonearena.com/news/Asus-ME371MG-leaks-out-as-a-Nexus-7-look-alike-but-with-Intel-inside_id37958">a low end 7" $199 table</a>t with a 1280x800 IPS display running on the Atom Z2420 processor.</p> <P> <p>Hat tip to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.techmeme.com/">Techmeme for many of the links here</a>.</p>2013-01-02T08:45:00ZWindows 8 Tablet Launch #FailMicrosoft Windows tablets, in spite of a superior Intel processor, suffer from hardware and software problems &#151; and are overpriced. The PC industry seems to have a misguided notion that it doesn't need to compete on specs and price with the iPad 4 and Nexus 10. It's shocking that Microsoft spent three years producing an antiquated overpriced product such as the Surface while Apple and Google, including their partners, are producing superior products in 6-month cycles.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-8-tablet-launch-fail/240145401?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Six months ago <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-8-intel-atom-soc-will-be-ipad-ki/240001444">I extolled the virtue of Win8 tablets</a>; and today I have to eat crow. From overpriced hardware to buggy drivers and half-designed Operating System (OS), I could not have imagined worse execution by Microsoft, Intel and the OEMs at a worse time.</p> <P> <p>While I was pessimistic about the Windows 8 launch because Microsoft forced the Metro touch interface on non-touch devices, I held out hope for the new touch and battery optimized tablets running Windows 8. This wasn't the Windows-incompatible Windows RT OS but the full Windows 8 experience running on Intel's new breed of Atom "Clover Trail" processors that can compete with ARM based processors on battery life while dominating CPU performance (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6529/busting-the-x86-power-myth-indepth-clover-trail-power-analysis">benchmarks here</a>). But the launch of Windows 8 tablets has so far failed miserably and it was doomed from the start by Microsoft.</p> <P> <p>Instead of treating Windows 8 tablets running on Intel's latest chip as its savior, Microsoft inexplicably decided to back the slower and less energy-efficient ARM based Tegra 3 processor for its flagship Surface product. All the advertising and media attention went to Surface and ARM based Windows RT tablets so the public barely knew anything about Windows 8 tablets. To make things worse, most of the 20 OEM Windows 8 Tablet designs were delayed two months after the Windows 8 and Surface launch because of driver and firmware bugs. It seemed as if Microsoft spent all of its development effort to get Surface RT ready and neglected Windows 8 tablets which explains why <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-25/windows-8-bugs-plaguing-microsoft-intel-ceo-said-to-tell-staff.html">Intel's CEO Paul Otellini complained in September about Windows 8 bugs</a>.</p> <P> <p>Two months ago I had very high hopes for the Samsung ATIV 500T Windows 8 tablet when I managed to get a review unit from Intel. But there were so many bugs that I held off for two months to wait for the fixes. After three major driver and firmware updates covering everything from BIOS, chipset, Pen to Sound, and Graphics, I no longer have to reboot twice a day and the tablet is in a near-stable state, but it still crashes and needs rebooting when I use Netflix's Metro app. These issues may be related to an entirely new class of drivers used for "Connected Standby" (always on) devices on tablets, since I haven't experienced these problems in Windows 8 on conventional laptop and desktop systems.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/Samsung_ATIV_500T_dock1.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Samsung ATIV 500T dock connector (bottom view)</div> <P> <p>In its current software state, the Samsung ATIV 500T would have been my favorite mobility laptop if it didn't have an unusable dock. While the keyboard and touchpad are excellent, the docking connector suffers a fatal design flaw. The ATIV 500T's keyboard/trackpad dock uses tiny pins to touch flat plates on the bottom of the 500T tablet which become disconnected with the slightest disturbance. Even routine typing causes the tablet to disconnect from the dock. Sometimes it just means keys presses and mouse movements won't register. Other times you'll hear the Windows 8 device disconnect chime. The problem only got worse after two months of use.</p> <P> <p style="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-8-tablet-launch-fail/240145401?pgno=2">Next Page: Better tablet designs like the Acer W510</a></p> <P><p>Most of the other Windows 8 tablets use more reliable <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_ribbon">micro-ribbon connections</a> that maintain solid electrical connections even if the dock connector is pulled out most of the way. When I tested the Acer W510 Clover Trail Windows 8 tablet by lifting up and shaking the tablet with the dock attached, the keyboard and trackpad never lost connection. Yet the Acer W510 suffers from a buggy trackpad that won't reliably move the cursor left or right when the integrated button is depressed. It's unclear if the W510 trackpad issue can be resolved with a driver or firmware update. The Acer W510 also has a smaller netbook size keyboard because the tablet is only 10.1", and isn't optimal for serious typing. By comparison, the Samsung ATIV 500T tablet is 11.6".</p> <P> <p>The Asus VivoTab 11.6" Clover Trail tablet is another alternative but it sells at an unrealistic $799 price point which doesn't even come with the $199 keyboard and trackpad dock. Even the $499 to $599 price point of some Windows 8 Clover Trail tablets aren't competitively priced with the display and graphics they offer. Tablets with Wide-XGA (1366x768) resolution displays simply can't sell at the same price of an iPad 4 with a "Retina" (2048x1536) resolution display.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/Samsung_ATIV_500T_dock2.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Samsung ATIV 500T dock</div> <P> <p>From a pricing perspective, Microsoft, Intel and the PC industry aren't even close to being competitive. While the Intel Clover Trail chip used in the Samsung ATIV 500T has the fastest CPU performance of any available tablet, the graphics (GPU) and display on any of the Windows 8 tablet is embarrassingly poor, especially when compared to the fourth generation iPad and Samsung Nexus 10 tablet. Despite these inferior specifications, the Samsung ATIV 500T costs nearly twice as much as the Android-based Samsung Nexus 10.</p> <P> <p>The PC industry seems to have this misguided notion that it doesn't need to compete on specs and price with the iPad 4 and Nexus 10. Graphics performance and display resolution have become the new megahertz and megapixel race in the iPad era and today's tablet buyers expect top level hardware at a $399 or $499 price point. It's shocking that Microsoft spent three years producing an antiquated overpriced product such as the Surface while Apple and Google, including their partners, are producing superior products in 6-month cycles.</p> <P> <p>Interestingly enough, many Microsoft fans started treating me like some sort of traitor when <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/why-microsofts-new-surface-tablets-will/240002303">I criticized Microsoft Surface</a>. But the truth is that Microsoft has betrayed PC users with inferior hardware and higher-than-Apple profit margins. This strategy didn't work for Microsoft in smartphones and it won't work for tablets. Windows Phone 7 failed to gain much ground because nobody got excited about an 800x480 resolution smartphone in an era of 1280x800 Android phones. Microsoft hopelessly chased Apple users who were loyal to Apple while PC users concerned with value and specifications jumped ship to Android. Surface and Windows 8 tablets also won't gain much traction when consumers can buy competing tablets with 3 to 4 times the display pixel count and faster graphics performance.</p> <P> <p>Does this mean I've given up all hope on Windows? No. Not yet. I still have a lot of Windows applications I love and depend on; but time is running out and the competition is only getting stronger. If there's any hope for Microsoft, they will have to eat this bitter pill and take my criticisms seriously.</p> <P> <p>Perhaps Microsoft should consider Google's Nexus strategy. Instead of Microsoft building its own hardware, it should have its partners bid on a flagship Windows 8 tablet along the lines of Google's Nexus 7 and Nexus 10 tablets. In exchange for good hardware at a competitive price point, the winning hardware partner would benefit from Microsoft's special logo and marketing. This won't result in Apple-like margins but at least it gives Microsoft a chance to stay relevant in the tablet space.</p> <P>2012-12-03T07:02:00ZWill iPads Get Intel CPUs or Macs Get ARM?Rumors have been spreading that Apple will shift their Macs to ARM processors and that Intel will make them. It's more likely that Apple and Intel will compromise and move higher-end systems, including the iPad, to Intel architectures. Moving the iPhone won't make as much sense.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/will-ipads-get-intel-cpus-or-macs-get-ar/240143007?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Rumors have been swirling of Apple switching away from Intel and completely to ARM. Here are some scenarios and the likelihood of them happening.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Apple completely switches away from Intel</p> <P> <p>When rumors spread last month about Apple moving MacBooks to ARM, proponents of this theory pointed out that Apple's custom chip is already faster than Intel's Atom chips. But that's only for smartphone and tablet processors and Intel is still 3-8 times faster on notebook processors.</p> <P> <p>Here's a compilation of benchmarks comparing an Intel x86 "Sandy Bridge" processor, Intel "Medfield" and "Clover Trail" processors, and ARM processors from Apple and Samsung. The benchmarks use SunSpider, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html">a JavaScript-based benchmark from the Webkit project</a>. The scores are times to complete tasks, so smaller is better.</p> <P> <TABLE style="border:1px solid black;"> <TR><TH style="border:1px solid black;">Chip</TH><TH style="border:1px solid black;">SunSpider</TH></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Intel i5-2520M Sandy bridge dual-core 3.2</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://mobilesociety.typepad.com/mobile_life/2012/11/comparing-cpu-power-between-smartphones-and-notebooks-with-sunspider.html">175</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Chromebook (Exynos 5) dual-core 1.7GHz</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6422/samsung-chromebook-xe303-review-testing-arms-cortex-a15/6">690</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Samsung ATIV dual-core (Intel Clover Trail Atom Z2760)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Intel-Clovertrail-Atom-Z2760-Windows-8-Tablet-Performance-Preview/?page=3">712</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">iPad 4th generation (Apple A6X)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.barefeats.com/ipad402.html">839</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">iPhone 5 (Apple A6)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6309/iphone-5a6-sunspider-performance">914.7</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Motorola RAZR I (Intel Atom Z2460 1.5 GHz)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/18/motorolas-razr-i-benchmarks-intel-2ghz-medfield/">1062</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Lava XOLO X900 single-core (Intel Medfield Atom Z2460)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6309/iphone-5a6-sunspider-performance">1279.4</a></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Nexus 10 (Exynos 5250)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.theandroidsoul.com/nexus-10-bechmarks-scores-are-out-prove-dual-core-exynos-5250-is-no-slouch/">1370</a></TD></TR> </TABLE> <P> <p>Could Apple boost their own ARM chip 3-fold and possibly use it in a product like the Macbook Air? There are two problems with this scenario. First, while Apple boosts ARM performance 3-fold, Intel won't be standing still with its upcoming Haswell and Broadwell processors, which means a gap will still exist. Second, it will take a huge performance hit doing binary translations of x86 Mac applications to ARM. As much as Apple wants to switch to in-house CPU technology, Apple is a pragmatic company so the likelihood of Apple moving completely away from Intel is very low.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote>BYTE's Larry Seltzer imagines <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/imagine-ipad-mac-combined/240044406">the iPad and MacBook combined into one</a>.</b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Apple uses Intel to make its ARM chips</p> <P> <p>Apple could also ask Intel to just make Apple ARM chips for its own smartphones and tablets. Apple would get access to the most advanced fabrication process in the world but Intel would be disinclined to do this. This would make Apple's ARM chips faster and make them more competitive against Intel's processors. Intel would get revenue from fabrication services, but it is not a high margin business. Intel makes far more money making chips based on their own intellectual property. The odds of this scenario happening are also very low.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Apple completely switches to Intel</p> <P> <p>Could Apple switch to Intel processors for its iPhone and iPad? Probably not for iPhone because Intel's current "Medfield" Atom chip is slower than Apple's custom ARM chip. Intel's Merrifield chip due in 2013 will likely get a 2x boost in performance over Clover Trail, but Apple won't stand still in performance so a gap will probably still exist. </p> <P> <p>For the iPad there is a realistic possibility. Intel Haswell and Broadwell will bring notebook and desktop computing performance into the mobile arena for tablets by drastically lowering the power consumption. Intel's Haswell will likely have a huge performance advantage over Apple's ARM chips. It might run ARM emulation faster than ARM instructions running natively on Apple's ARM processor. This opens the possibility for a compromise between Intel and Apple.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Apple compromises with Intel</p> <P> <p>Intel could agree to make Apple's ARM processors for the Apple iPhone in exchange for Apple switching to Intel for the iPad. Since Apple is already <a target="_blank" href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/30/apple-samsung-chip-alternatives/">looking to move away from Samsung's fab</a>, this <a target="_blank" href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/30/intel-apple-samsung-chips/">compromise between Apple and Intel may already be happening</a>. This means Apple would get the much faster CPU and GPU for its iPad and a much better fabrication process for its own ARM processors.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Dec/macbook-ipad.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The MacPad Pro?</div> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Yet another architecture shift?!?!</p> <P> <p>Apple has already hauled Mac developers from the 68K to the PowerPC to Intel architecture. Those earlier switches were necessary because the processor lines had topped out on performance. Apple was able to get away with these moves by providing some tools and, for a while, emulation of the old chips. </p> <P> <p>There wouldn't be a performance argument for moving Macs to ARM, not even in the long term. The main argument for picking one chip would be if Apple wanted to unify the iOS and MacOS product lines into a single software platform, as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/imagine-ipad-mac-combined/240044406">BYTE's Editorial Director Larry Seltzer has suggested</a>. After such a move, Macbooks would stay on x86 but iPads would switch to x86 with emulation support for existing ARM software. The development process for tablets is much simpler to port compared to Mac applications.</p> <P> <p>At least for the iPad, if not the iPhone, this makes sense. Microsoft may or may not have gotten the tablet-PC combination right in Windows 8, but they have the right idea, and Apple is keeping a close watch. Currently their software is far away from this, so don't expect it any time soon, but depending on how consumers react to Windows 8 it may make sense.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Apple vs. Intel: Why pick a fight?</p> <P> <p>As smart as Apple&#8217;s CPU architecture team is, do they really want to go against Intel in the long run? Sure they caught Intel with their pants down in mobile because it takes Intel 5 years to create a chip from scratch, but Intel is getting caught up. Many companies and pundits have written Intel off in the past. First it was RISC and then it was AMD. Intel might stumble from time to time but fabs and chips are their bread and butter.</p> <P> <p>Some would say that a company as successful as Apple would be crazy to change a winning formula, but this is the technology business. Things change rapidly and if you don't take charge of your own destiny someone else will do it for you. Even with the market the way it is, Apple is vulnerable.</p>2012-11-15T08:51:00ZWhy Windows Tablets Are The Best Storage DealPeople who complain that too much of the flash storage in Windows 8 and RT tablets is taken up by the OS and Office 2013 app are missing a big point. At least they can add their own flash storage later via microSD card for very little money. Apple iPad and Google Nexus tablet users, on the other hand, are stuck with whatever storage comes with their device.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240142113?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>There's been some grumbling in the press about the amount of usable storage users actually get with the Microsoft Surface or any other Windows 8 or Windows RT tablet. Now there's <a target="_blank" href="http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019680330_apusmicrosoftsurfacelawsuit.html">a lawyer trying to sue Microsoft over the matter</a>. The complaint: that roughly half of the 32 GBs of storage that comes with the $499 32-GB Surface tablet is already used up by the operating system and applications such as Microsoft Office 2013. The $499 16-GB iPad, by comparison, leaves most of its storage (14.3 GB) free for user files. </p> <P> <p>One way to look at it is that Windows tablets have excessive overhead in operating system and application storage usage. Another way to look at it is that Microsoft didn't have to bundle applications such as Microsoft Office 2013 -- and users will use up that storage anyway if they buy Office and other applications afterward.</p> <P> <p>Then there's the even larger point that Windows tablets don't gouge users on storage expansion like the iPad or Google Nexus tablets do. To add 16 GB or 48 GB of storage to an iPad, customers must choose up front to pay an additional $100 or $200. To add 16 GB of storage to the Google Nexus 10, customers must decide up front if they want to pay an extra $100. Once these tablets are purchased, there is no practical way to add storage.</p> <P> <p>Windows tablets like the Microsoft Surface also offer additional up-front storage for $100 per 32 GBs, but customers can decline and add their own flash storage later via microSD cards for very little money. A quick search online reveals that 64 GBs of microSD storage costs as little as $60 which is a fraction of the premium Apple charges for 64 GB in an iPad. The total available internal storage in a Windows tablet is also much greater than an iPad despite the additional storage used by the Windows OS and applications and at a much lower price.</p> <P> <p>Windows tablets also permit memory expansion via USB. It's possible to hack an iPad and Google Nexus tablet to expand storage externally, but external solutions ruin the form factor of a tablet and use up the one docking port the device has. It just isn't practical to have messy cables or dongles hanging off a tablet that adds bulk and clutter. MicroSD cards add no size and practically undetectable weight to the tablet. </p> <P> <p>This might lead one to wonder why even bother paying an additional $100 for the 64 GB option in Windows tablets, but it turns out that there might be justification for it. Although it is possible to install traditional Windows applications onto a microSD card, there is a performance penalty. This isn't too big of a problem for large media files because even the HD videos only require 1 megabyte per second (MB/sec).</p> <P> <p>Modern microSD cards typically support read and write speeds in excess of 10 megabytes per second. Based on my tests, internal flash storage on a Windows 8 tablet like the Samsung ATIV 500T supports 80 MB/sec read speeds and substantially faster random access performance. The faster random access performance comes in handy for Windows swap storage performance or database performance which comes in handy for Microsoft Outlook. Here are two <a target="_blank" href="http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalDiskMark/index-e.html">Chrystal Disk Mark</a> tests I ran on the Samsung tablet using internal flash storage and microSD storage.</p> <P> <TABLE style="width:452px; padding:0px;"><TR><TD style="width:224px; padding:0px;"><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/c-drive.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/c-drive-224.png" /></a><div style="color:#000000; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Internal flash storage (Samsung ATIV 500T)</div></TD><TD style="width:224px; padding:0px;"><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/d-drive.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/d-drive-224.png" /></a><div style="color:#000000; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">MicroSD flash storage (Samsung MB-MSAGA 16 GB)</div></TD></TR><TR><TD colspan=2 style="color:#CC0000; font-size:small;font-style: italic; text-align:center;">(Click either image for a larger version.)</TD></TR></TABLE> <P> <p>If there's a scandal here it's not the overhead in Microsoft's tablets. It's Apple's greedy treatment of its customers by refusing to support microSD in its devices.</p>2012-10-24T14:09:00ZiPad Mini Leaves Gaping Price UmbrellaThe iPad Mini is a modest product at a premium price. That's good news for Google, Amazon, and Barns & Noble, but it probably won't prevent the iPad from slipping below 50% market share.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240009684?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>My worst fear about the iPad Mini has come true: It's way overpriced. The iPad Mini delivers a sub-HD 1024x768 resolution display at an entry price of $329, which is vastly higher than the $199 entry price for 7" Android tablets that have 1280x800 or better resolution displays.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote style="font-size:small">Read what other BYTE contributors are saying about the iPad Mini:<ul> <li>Serdar Yegulalp: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/ipad-mini-apple-could-have-done-more/240009677">iPad Mini: Apple Could Have Done More</a></li> <li>Dino Londis: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/with-ipad-mini-apple-sees-bigger-picture/240009683">With iPad Mini Apple Sees Bigger Picture</a></li> <li>Larry Seltzer: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/bring-your-own-ipad-mini/240009615">Bring Your Own iPad mini?</a></li> </ul></b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/ipad-mini-and-nexus7.png" /> <P> <p>Physically, the iPad Mini is the thinnest and lightest in the 7- to 8-inch tablet segment and the superior craftsmanship is undeniable. The added width problem is mitigated by the reduced casing, although it might be a bit too wide to palm and it might not fit in the same pockets. And although the back has a beautiful metallic surface, it doesn't feel nearly as good as the rubberized back of its competitors.</p> <P> <p>The resolution of the 7.85" display--Apple rounds to 7.9"--is utterly uninspiring compared to the competition. Apple touted the larger Web surfing experience, but for video playback, the size of widescreen videos isn't much larger than a 7" widescreen tablet and HD videos have to be scaled down to 1024-pixel-by-576-pixel resolution rather than a native 1280x720 resolution. Even the Full HD 1080P-capable 8.9" Kindle and 9" Barnes & Noble Nook HD+ are less expensive at $299 and $269, respectively.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/tablet-sizes-compared.jpg" /> <P> <p>Apple spent an unusual amount of time talking about, but not naming, the Nexus 7 at its iPad Mini launch event, which shows how worried Apple is about the 7" competitors eating into the tablet market. Yet Apple is leaving a lot of room for a lower-cost competitor with superior hardware. The market has shown willingness to pay a premium price for a premium Apple product, but the iPad Mini is a modest product at a premium price. That's good news for Google, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble, but it probably won't prevent the iPad from slipping below 50% market share.</p>2012-10-22T12:06:00ZConsumer Confusion Coming As Retailers Mislabel Windows RTRetailers are doing a lousy job of teaching customers the difference between Windows RT tablets and Windows 8 tablets. This sloppiness will come back to bite them when customers discover RT tablets' limitations and return them to the store.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240009490?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Windows RT will launch Oct. 26 alongside its sibling operating system Windows 8. Both Windows RT and Windows 8 will run on nearly identical looking hardware and be able to run applications downloaded from the new Microsoft Store. But there is one key difference between Windows RT and Windows 8. Windows RT can't run existing Microsoft Windows applications such as older versions of Microsoft Office and it <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/windows-rt-wont-run-some-old-printers/240004406">won't support the same hardware</a> as previous versions of Windows.</p> <P> <p>Despite the major limitations of Windows RT, Microsoft seems to be doing its best to downplay the differences. Employees in Microsoft's own official stores <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/17/3514556/windows-8-vs-windows-rt-surface-confused-microsoft-store-employees">can't explain the difference and limitations of Windows RT</a> versus Windows 8 and falsely claim that Windows RT can run Windows applications such as Steam games, according to The Verge. In fairness, Microsoft is undertaking <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203400604578070662270723422.html">a massive campaign to train its own sales people</a> and those of other retailers, according to Monday's <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. <P> <p>But for now, what I've seen with my own eyes says that retailers are blurring the lines between the products. Major online retailers are already trying to pass off Windows RT tablets as Windows 8 tablets. This is a customer relations train wreck waiting to happen. </p> <P> <p>Futureshop, for instance, advertises the Asus Vivo Tab RT in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/category/windows-tablets/31088.aspx?p">its Windows Tablets section</a> which is headlined by a large Windows 8 logo and shows a Vivo Tab RT tablet displaying the Windows 8 logo. The Vivo Tab RT runs on an ARM processor and the Windows RT operating system. The product name does include "RT," but there are 11 words in that name, plus the model number, and customers could reasonably be confused.</p> <P> <hr /> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/future-shop-false-win8.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/future-shop-false-win8-452.png" /></a><hr /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; font-style: italic; text-align:right;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/category/windows-tablets/31088.aspx">Advertisement seen on Future Shop</a>, Oct. 22, 2012.</div> <P> <p>Newegg also is advertising the Asus Vivo Tab RT in its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.newegg.com/Tablets-Accessories/Category/ID-164?Tpk=tablet">Win 8 Tablets section</a>. Under operating system specifications, Newegg reports that the Vivo Tab RT runs the "Windows 8 RT" operating system, merging the names of two operating systems. Other retailers are using the same nonexistent OS name. Shoppers might not know that the Acer W510 Windows 8 tablet is fully compatible with existing Windows applications and hardware peripherals, but the Asus Vivo Tab RT is not. They also aren't shown a $499 version of the Acer W510 with 32 GB of storage.</p> <P> <hr /> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/newegg-false-win8.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/newegg-false-win8-452.png" /></a> <P> <hr /> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/newegg-win8RT.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/RT-tablet-ads/newegg-win8RT-452.jpg" /></a><hr /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; font-style: italic; text-align:right;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=Property&Subcategory=2557&Description=&Type=&N=100013681&IsNodeId=1&IsPowerSearch=1&srchInDesc=&MinPrice=&MaxPrice=&OEMMark=N&PropertyCodeValue=449%3A339747&PropertyCodeValue=449%3A339748&PropertyCodeValue=449%3A347307&name=Windows-8-Tablets">Advertisements seen on Newegg.com</a> Oct. 22, 2012.</div> <P> <p>It is worth noting that many online retailers, <a target="_blank" href="http://surface.microsoftstore.com/">including the Microsoft Store</a>, don't use these confusing designations. Even so, the real OS names are confusing enough.</p> <P> <p>I've spent a lot of time pointing out that ARM-based tablets <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/intel-win8-tablet-competitive-price-vs-a/240007503">won't have a cost advantage</a> or <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/arm-battery-life-advantage-myth-lives-on/240005774">a battery life advantage</a>. This is why I've argued that Microsoft's Surface RT tablet or any other <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/why-microsofts-new-surface-tablets-will/240002303">Windows RT tablet is doomed to fail</a>. Windows RT tablets have all the limitations and none of the commonly assumed advantages of ARM-based systems such as battery life and low cost. But most shoppers won't know the difference, especially if the Microsoft Store and other online retailers hide the limitations of Windows RT.</p> <P> <p>My prediction? A lot of customers won't get far enough to ever know their RT tablet has mediocre battery life. Once they find out it can't run their favorite apps and games, or use their old peripherals, they're going to bring these devices back to the store in droves. </p>2012-10-08T18:15:00ZHow The iPad Went From Monopoly To Minority Within A YearApple's tablet market share has been slipping over the last year because of strong 7-inch Android competition, and now Windows 8 is right around the corner. Can Apple make something superior at a reasonable price that doesn't destroy its higher-end market? BYTE's George Ou is doubtful.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240008688?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>When we first got word over the summer about a smaller and less expensive iPad, it was a foregone conclusion that the miniature iPad would be a smash hit for Apple this fall. Apple looked invincible and pundits had proclaimed the tablet market to be the exclusive domain of Apple. But just a few short months later the competitive environment has changed drastically and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/device_ownership">the iPad is rapidly approaching a minority market share</a>. With robust competition from Google and Amazon and soon Windows 8, it's no longer a certainty that the iPad Mini can halt the rapidly declining market share of the iPad. </p> <P> <p><b>UPDATE</b>: <i>The Nook HD 7" actually has the highest resolution of any 7" tablet on the market with 1440x900 pixels. The Nook HD also has a MicroSD expansion slot which allows users to add inexpensive flash storage. The Nexus 7, Kindle Fire, and iPads do not have MicroSD slots.</i></p> <P> <p>We know that the probable specification of the iPad Mini is a tablet with a 7.85", standard 1024-by-768-pixel XGA resolution screen. There are some concerns about the 4 x 3 aspect ratio because it might make the iPad Mini too wide to comfortably hold in one hand and too large to fit in a pocket, which popular 7-inch Android tablets have no trouble fitting. The iPad Mini's thinner frame might be enough to offset the problem but it remains to be seen.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><i>This story is one of several <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/will-the-ipad-mini-succeed-can-it-possib/240008686">dueling commentaries on the upcoming iPad Mini</a>. Also read:<ul> <li>Dino Londis: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/is-there-any-apple-magic-left-for-the-ip/240008711">Any Apple Magic Left For iPad Mini?</a></li> <li>Chris Spera: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/the-ipad-mini-success-depends-on-apple-c/240008690">The iPad Mini Success Depends on Apple-Controlled Issues.</a></li> <li>Serdar Yegulalp: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/why-the-ipad-mini-will-succeed-even-if-i/240008689">Why the iPad Mini Will Succeed, Even If It Really Shouldn't.</a></li> <!--<li></li> <li></li> <li></li>--> </ul></i></b><hr /></p> <P> <p>The third-generation 9.7-inch iPad has a distinct advantage over other tablets with its Retina display with leading 2048-pixel-by-1536-pixel resolution. But the iPad Mini finds itself outgunned in an era of HD and full HD resolution tablets. All the new 7-inch Android tablets, such as the Asus Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD, and the Nook HD, have HD resolution of 1280 pixels by 720 pixels (or better - see update above), which is great for native resolution HD content. The Kindle Fire 8.9" HD will have 1920-by-1200-pixel resolution, which is higher than full HD, and widescreen videos will look nearly as large as they do on the full-size 9.7-inch iPad. The iPad Mini will have to scale movies and videos down to a letterboxed 7.2-inch screen with a 1024-pixel-by-576-pixel resolution, which is substantially worse than the competition.</p> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/iPad-Mini-Succeed-Fail/George-display-size.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/iPad-Mini-Succeed-Fail/George-display-size-452.png" /></a> <P> <p>Compounding the problems for the iPad Mini is the question of price. Priced at $199, Apple would have to operate at razor-thin margins and risk cannibalizing higher price devices. Even at a starting price of $249, the value of the iPad Mini is poor compared to other HD resolution $199 tablets. At $299, it's the same price as the full-HD 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD and even exceeds the $269 Nook HD+ 9-inch. There's also the question of how Apple would justify a $299 4-inch iPod Touch. If Apple attempts a $349 starting price, the iPad Mini is probably a dud unless it has a Retina display. At 52% market share and slipping, Apple is no longer the only player in town and it will have to compete on price at some level.</p> <P> <p>If Apple had quadrupled the resolution of the fourth-generation iPod Touch from 960 by 640 pixels to 1920 by 1280 pixels, which is identical to the Nook HD+ 9-inch, then it probably would have had a winner at $349. But if the iPad Mini arrives with a non-Retina 1024-pixel-by-768-pixel screen as predicted, then Apple miscalculated badly. It will have to hope that its brand justifies $249 on an iPad Mini with an inferior display and hope that it can slow its market share decline. </p>2012-10-05T11:51:00ZWindows 8 Tablets For $399? It's PossibleLast month the media predicted unrealistic, sky-high prices for Windows 8 tablets. Now, Acer, Lenovo, and Asus confirm what we suspected all along: People won't pay hundreds of dollars more for a Windows tablet when they can get an iPad for $499. If the PC industry is serious about competing with Apple, Win8 tablets are going to have to start at $399.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240008539?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>The media botched it last month by reporting unrealistically high prices for Windows 8 tablets and writing their premature obituaries. Several tech sites reported that starting prices for Windows 8 tablets running on Intel Atom Z2760 Clover Trail would come in at <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/09/asus-windows-8-tablet-pcs-to-start-at-599-cost-up-to-1299/">$799 for Asus</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.neowin.net/news/acer-confirms-windows-8-tablet-specifications-and-pricing-in-new-zealand">a "confirmed" $712 from Acer</a>. They also reported that Win8 tablets running on Intel Core i3 Ivy Bridge processors <a target="_blank" href="http://www.techjungle.com/8212">would cost $1,299</a>. <P> These prices were so crazy I thought I was living in some parallel universe where the iPad didn't exist. I tried to rein in on the madness by reporting that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/intel-win8-tablet-competitive-price-vs-a/240007503">Intel confirmed that its Atom System on Chip (SoC) was cost competitive with ARM SoC</a> and that Intel expected Atom tablets to be price competitive.</p> <P> <p>Last week I spoke with reps at Lenovo, Acer, and Asus about the pricing rumors at the Intel Clover Trail event. Although they wouldn't disclose specific pricing, all three said they are aware of the market realities and that they would be able to hit a wide range of prices. <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wpcentral.com/lenovo-thinkpad-tablet-2-be-priced-799-keyboard">The reported $799 for the Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2</a> included a keyboard dock and Office 2013, which is at least a $200 markup. When I asked about the $799 figure, Lenovo said it will offer a range of pricing with different storage configurations of 32 GB and 64 GB and 1 GB or 2 GB of RAM. Asus said it will stay with 2 GB of RAM--but will offer different storage options.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote>From Acer to Lenovo, hardware makers showed off early versions of Windows 8 tablets at the Computex trade show. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/windows-8-tablets-computex-sneak-peek/240001555">Click here to see an image gallery of them</a>.</b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <p>As for Acer, this week we found out that Acer's W700 Windows 8 11.6 tablet running on Ivy Bridge processors with a Full HD 1920 x 1080-pixel screen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/4/3453032/acer-iconia-w700-tablet-availability-pricing">will start at $799</a>, which completely debunks last month's $1,299 rumors. <P> Although Atom tablet pricing wasn't disclosed, Intel Ivy Bridge processors branded Core i3 and i5 cost around $230, which is roughly $200 more than Intel Clover Trail SoC parts. The Acer W700 also starts with 64 GB of SSD storage, 4 GB of RAM, and a 11" 1920 x 1080-pixel screen, while Acer's W510 Clover Trail tablet starts with 32 GB SSD, 2 GB RAM, and a 10.1" 1366 x 768 screen. The Acer W700 has at least $300 more in component costs so it's not difficult to imagine a $499 or lower price for the Acer W510.</p> <P> But I suspect that competitive pressures will force all the PC makers to prices even lower than $499. Consumers will look at the market-leading $499 third-generation iPad with its Retina 2048 x 1536 display and wonder why they're paying $499 for a Windows 8 tablet with relatively low resolution. <P> People also will look at the $299 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD with 1920 x 1200 resolution and wonder why they should pay $499 for a Windows 8 tablet and another $150 to $200 for a keyboard and extra battery dock. The PC industry will hope that people pay a premium for a full Windows computing experience but a $200 premium for a device with much lower resolution might be a tough sell to consumers. <P> Sure, there will be business customers willing to pay these prices, especially if they include Windows 8 Professional, but the PC industry badly needs a winner with the mass appeal of an iPad or Android device. Even Apple is caving to pricing pressures with an iPad Mini as Android tablets have grown to a 48% tablet market share. <P> Bottom line: If the PC industry is serious about capturing market share and staying relevant, it will need to start Windows tablets at $399.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/win8-tablets.png" />2012-10-03T07:00:00ZMicrosoft Hits Back At Intel Over Tablet ReadinessMicrosoft and Intel might be sniping at each other now, but we can still look forward to Clover Trail-equipped Windows 8 tablets delivering the same great battery life as the ARM-equipped iPad.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240008284?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Last week, it was Intel's Paul Otellini criticizing Microsoft, for releasing Windows 8 before it's ready. (Intel quickly <a target="_blank" href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports">denied Otellini was unhappy</a>.) On Monday, an unnamed "person with knowledge of the matter" blamed <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-01/microsoft-intel-alliance-weakens-tablet-challenge-looms.html">Intel's delay in shipping power management drivers</a> for slowing development of Clover-based Windows 8 tablets</a>.</p> <P> <p>Microsoft and Intel have remained relatively mum about these claims, and both might be overblown. Operating systems are always a work in progress and no one has claimed that Clover Trail tablets will slip their launch dates. This might be nothing more than tit-for-tat bickering between Wintel partners: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/arm-battery-life-advantage-myth-lives-on/240005774">Microsoft promotes ARM battery life</a> at the exclusion of Intel, Intel fires back about Windows 8 readiness, and then Microsoft complains about delayed Clover Trail drivers.</p> <P> <p><b>Update:</b> According to an Intel spokesperson, the company confirms that their Atom Z2760 'Clover Trail' chip is on track for Windows 8. Intel stated that "We can't comment on OEM device availability but I can say that we remain on track from a Intel Atom Z2760 perspective."</p> <P> <p>Intel showed incredible battery life benchmarks for Clover Trail last month. At least half a dozen PC makers including Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus, and Acer are committed to offering Windows 8 Intel Clover Trail tablets on Oct. 26 alongside the Windows 8 launch. Intel showed that Clover Trail could compete in battery life against an Asus Infinity Transformer running a Qualcomm ARM processor and Apple's iPad 2 and iPad 3 running Apple's internally developed ARM. Using a standard brightness of 200 nits, all of the tablets were able to achieve nine to 11 hours of video playback. Here are some detailed results of the total system power draw.</p> <P> <TABLE border=1> <TR><TD>&nbsp;</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Intel Clover Trail tablet (1366x768)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Asus Infiniti Transformer (1920x1080)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">iPad 2 (1024x768)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">iPad 3 (2048x1536)</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Video playback</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">3 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">3.1 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">2.5 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">4.3 watts</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black;">Web surfing</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">2.8 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">3.4 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">2.6 watts</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black;">4.5 watts</TD></TR> </TABLE> <P> <p>Note that the differences in system-level power draw are largely proportional to the differences in screen resolution. The higher the resolution, the more power the backlight needs to penetrate the screen transistors and achieve 200-nit brightness. Some of the other differences might be attributable to the radio base band and the video decoder. However, the processor technology used by Intel and its ARM competitors is very similar.</p> <P> <p>Intel Clover Trail is crucial to both Intel and Microsoft because it is the only system-on-chip (SoC) technology that allows Windows 8 tablets to support existing Windows applications and hardware drivers as well as always-on, all-day battery life. Windows RT on ARM architecture will lack Windows applications and hardware support, which <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/why-microsofts-new-surface-tablets-will/240002303">makes those slates a hard sell</a> given how small the Windows App Market is for tablets.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Oct/windows8.jpg" /> <P>2012-09-18T08:45:00ZIntel Win8 Tablet Competitive Price vs. ARM ConfirmedWidespread reports still claim that Intel Windows 8 tablets based on the Clover Trail Atom SOC (system-on-chip) will be priced very high. I have been maintaining the opposite for months. But we don't need to guess anymore because I've confirmed with a real source. Looks like ARM-based Windows RT is a loser.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240007503?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Yesterday's media reports that Asus Intel SoC based Windows 8 tablets are priced ridiculously high ($799 base) are almost certainly wrong. The story <a target="_blank" href="http://www.zdnet.com/asus-windows-8-tablet-pricing-comes-in-high-demand-likely-low-7000004378/">was based on a single anonymous source</a> with purportedly leaked slides but it was widely reported as news and they even confused Windows RT pricing with Windows 8 pricing. The thought that Asus would attempt to sell a Windows RT tablet with hardware equivalent to their $399 Android based Transformer tablet at $599 should be a clue that these reports are dubious. $799 for a Windows 8 tablet running an Intel Atom SoC is simply unbelievable.</p> <P> <p>Any sane business person by now should know Apple dictates the price ceiling on tablets and notebooks. Apple can even charge a premium against Android and Windows RT because of their massive app store ecosystem. Windows 8 tablets have the benefits of a vast hardware peripheral and application ecosystem so they can be priced at or near iPad pricing if the hardware specs are similar. But we don't need to guess anymore because I've confirmed with a real source.</p> <P> <p>A spokesperson for Intel has confirmed with me that "Intel expects Clover Trail tablets to be competitively priced when compared to comparable tablets on the market". When I specifically asked Intel about the pricing of the Intel Atom Z2760 System-on-Chip (SoC) product being used in Windows 8 tablets compared to competing ARM architecture chips used in competing Windows RT tablets, Intel responded that "Intel Atom SoC will be competitively priced". The SoC contains the CPU, GPU, memory controller, and other I/O functionality but it's a relatively small part of the total system price of a tablet. To get a better idea of SoC pricing, I asked industry analyst David Kanter of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.realworldtech.com/">Real World Tech.</a> Kanter explained that ARM SoC chips are priced in range of $20 to $30. Intel didn't get specific on SoC pricing but depending on chip performance, the Intel SoC will not be radically different from ARM SoC chips. </p> <P> <p>Some people might point out that Lenovo stated that Lenovo Intel based Windows 8 tablets were going to be $200 to $300 more expensive than Lenovo's ARM based Windows RT tablets. But Lenovo was actually referring to Windows 8 tablets with higher performance and more expensive Ivy Bridge processors and larger displays. Lenovo did not say that its Intel Atom SoC based tablets being priced $200 to $300 more than its Windows RT ARM based tablets.</p> <P> <p>So Intel confirmed not only that Intel Atom SoC chips will be competitively priced with ARM, they're going a step further to say that tablets using Intel Atom SoC will be price competitive. Last month I debunked <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/09/clover-trail-atoms-will-give-windows-8-tablets-arm-like-battery-life/">the myth that Intel couldn't compete with ARM on battery life</a> and Intel gave additional details at last week's Intel Developer Forum (IDF) that <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/09/clover-trail-atoms-will-give-windows-8-tablets-arm-like-battery-life/">Atom is competitive with ARM on battery life</a>. Now I've debunked the widespread notion that Intel cannot field competitively priced tablets.</p> <P> <p>Superior price and battery life were the primary reason buyers would even consider ARM based tablets. Now we know that ARM will have neither advantage. That means Windows RT tablets will have all the limitations of Windows on ARM -- i.e. missing hardware and application compatibility -- but none of the purported advantages. It looks like my prediction that <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/09/clover-trail-atoms-will-give-windows-8-tablets-arm-like-battery-life/">Windows RT tablets will flop</a> is probably accurate.</p>2012-08-20T08:00:00ZARM Battery Life Advantage Myth Lives OnFor many years the only mobile devices that had decent battery life were based on ARM chips. But this is no longer the case--no matter what you might read or hear. ARM's monopoly on long battery life is coming to an end.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240005774?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Is Microsoft perpetuating the myth that <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture">ARM architecture</a> processors have an unparalleled battery life advantage over Intel processors? </p> <P> <p>That would seem to be the case Friday judging from aggregated news reports on Techmeme discussing <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/08/13/collaborating-to-deliver-windows-rt-pcs.aspx">the latest Windows 8 and RT blog from Steven Sinofsky</a>. Many reported that only Windows RT running on ARM will be able to run for weeks on a single battery charge while connected to the network in a mode called connected standby. My <em>BYTE</em> article was one of the few <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/240005434">accurate stories</a> pointing out that the new long battery life capability is on both ARM and Intel devices. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.technolog.msnbc.msn.com/technology/technolog/windows-rt-devices-will-have-320-hours-standby-941666">MSNBC even quoted me</a>--but continued to report that only RT will have connected standby.</p> <P> <p>Sinofsky seemed to have started the ARM-only connected standby misconception back in a <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/02/09/building-windows-for-the-arm-processor-architecture.aspx">February blog post</a>. To be clear, Sinofsky briefly mentioned in both of his posts that Intel SoC devices will support connected standby, too, but that point was easy to miss. All the details focused on Windows RT capability, which is what the press has largely picked up in the last six months.</p> <P> <p>Microsoft seems to have little desire to clarify this confusion. That's because the only perceived advantage of Windows RT on ARM over Windows 8 on Intel is the myth that only ARM devices are power efficient enough to run all day. Once you debunk this perceived battery life advantage of Windows RT, all you're left with are its serious limitations. Windows RT won't run the vast ecosystem of Windows applications or PC hardware peripherals. Even Microsoft Office 2013 for Windows RT won't have full compatibility with Office because it's missing features such as macro support. These are among the reasons why <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/tablets/240002303">Windows RT products including Microsoft Surface tablets are doomed to fail.</a></p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">ARM won't dominate mobile much longer</p> <P> <p>ARM proponents have long argued that Intel couldn't possibly build a power-efficient processor because of the extra silicon Intel has to commit to x86 legacy overhead. Industry expert David Kanter of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.realworldtech.com/">RealWorldTech</a> explained to me that this isn't much of an issue because the legacy silicon is a very small fraction of total system power draw and it's nullified with Intel's more advanced chip fabrication process. Yet the widespread notion of ARM superiority in mobile persists because Intel had never produced very low power processors used in smartphones in the past and only launched its first Medfield x86 SoC for smartphones earlier this year.</p> <P> <p>Even when <em>BYTE</em> reported in June that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">Windows 8 running Intel <i>Clover Trail</i> x86 SoC will have always-on and all-day battery life</a>, I was often met with skepticism and criticism that I had fallen for marketing hype. Critics ignore the fact that Intel Medfield x86 SoC has already been <a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5770/lava-xolo-x900-review-the-first-intel-medfield-phone/6">independently benchmarked by Anandtech</a>, and Clover Trail is essentially a dual-core version of the single-core Medfield processor with beefed up graphics with Windows DirectX capability. Intel's roadmaps have been accurate in the past and were trusted enough for Apple to switch its entire product line to Intel processors despite the lack of publicly available benchmarks. The evidence points to very competitive battery performance in Intel SoC products running Windows 8.</p> <P> <p>The only difference between ARM and Intel is that <em>all</em> ARM systems will support connected standby, but only the SoC versions of Intel hardware will support connected standby. Desktops, notebooks, netbooks, and ultrabooks using Intel Ivy Bridge or Intel Atom Cedar Trail or any older Intel chips will not support connected standby. However, Intel soon will vastly improve connected standby support; in 2013 it launches Haswell, its first SoC processor designed for mainstream high-performance desktops and notebooks. As for x86/x64 systems from AMD, there is no word when AMD will support connected standby.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">How Windows Phone 8 and Windows RT could thrive</p> <P> <p>Although the Windows App store is small today, a successful Windows 8-on-Intel launch could mean a bright future for Microsoft's store. That translates to good news for Windows Phone 8 and Windows RT on ARM-based smartphones and tablets because those apps can easily be made to run on everything from Intel desktops and notebooks to smartphones or tablets running on ARM. If Microsoft's app store succeeds, Windows on ARM stands a much better chance. But this hinges on a successful Windows 8 on Intel launch and that's where Microsoft might be getting ahead of itself.</p> <P> <p>There are 20 companies building fully capable Windows 8-on-Intel SoC devices. There are only four companies building limited-capability Windows RT-on-ARM devices so far. Yet Microsoft is heaping praise on Windows RT. HP, Acer, and Toshiba recently dropped out of the Windows RT race and they weren't happy with Microsoft's surprise entrance into the hardware business. </p> <P> <p>It seems that in Microsoft's haste to push alternative CPU architectures and possibly go it alone in hardware development, it risks diverting attention from Windows 8 on Intel SoC, which is its best chance for success. </p> <P> <p>Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said that Microsoft didn't leave any stone unturned when it built Surface, but some stones might be better off left alone for now.</p>2012-08-17T15:00:00ZFall Tablet Pricing Rumor RoundupThe impending price war among tablet makers will be bloody and fierce, but many of the rumors circulating right now about the iPad Mini, Android, Windows RT, and Windows 8 x86 tablets just don't make sense. Many are based on false assumptions, such as that Intel cannot compete on price. Let's run them through the BS detector.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240005767?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>As the tablet triad war heats up between Apple, Microsoft, and Google, speculation is running rampant on this holiday season's combatants. </p> <P> <p>Google fired the first salvo with its hot-selling $199 Asus Nexus 7 tablet and Apple is all but certain to close off the "price umbrella" with an iPad Mini. We've had various reports of the Acer Iconia W510 Windows 8 tablets priced between $400 and $800. We've had rumors swirling around a $199 Microsoft Surface RT ARM based tablet. We now have <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-16/lenovo-s-says-rt-tablets-up-to-300-cheaper-than-win-8.html">Lenovo hinting at $400 for its Windows RT ARM based tablet and $600-$700 for its business oriented ThinkPad Tablet 2</a>.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Apple iPad Mini</p> Apple's iPad Mini will almost certainly fall between $199 and $399. The lower boundary of $199 is the price of the Asus Nexus 7 and Apple will likely be able to charge a premium over this pricing if it follows through with a thinner and slightly-larger-screen iPad Mini. The higher boundary of $399 is the price of the Apple iPad 2 and it's likely that the iPad Mini will be at least $100 cheaper--making it $299. But that leaves a $100 price umbrella that might give Google too much breathing room especially if Asus drops the price of the 16GB model from $249, which it has room to do. So it's conceivable that Apple will launch something between $249 and $299 as a starting price with various options and accessories quickly bumping up the price.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Microsoft Surface RT $199 rumors</p> Microsoft already has announced that the Surface for Windows RT tablet running on an ARM processor will sell at a price comparable to similar ARM-based tablets, which would put it at around $350 to $399. That's the price of the Asus Transformer Android tablet with 1280 by 800 pixel display. At $499, a Surface RT tablet with a WXGA (1366 by 768 pixel) screen, an app store in its infancy, and no ability to run Windows PC applications seems like a long shot against the Retina-based (2048 by 1536 pixel) third-generation iPad.</p> <P> <p>Then we have our latest rumor, based on a single anonymous source <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/14/microsoft-surface-199/">from Engadget</a>, that Microsoft will sell a premium magnesium chassis 10.1" tablet for $199--which would have to be at a loss but which they could make up for with subscription contracts to Microsoft online services. This would not only go against Microsoft's public statements, it would also mean an outright war with Microsoft's hardware partners. </p> <P> <p>Those partners can't compete because they can't get Microsoft's Windows RT Operating System and Office 2013 license bundle for free. Microsoft makes almost all of its OS money from its hardware partners and it seems unlikely that they want to alienate them. Microsoft is well within its rights to go it alone in hardware like Apple, but it would risk an extremely lucrative business that sells hundreds of millions of software licenses a year, contrary to all the "post PC" talk.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Lenovo hints at tablet pricing</p> Lenovo's David Schmoock, head of North America operations, hinted that its upcoming Intel-based tablets running Windows 8 Professional will sell for $600 to $700 and its ARM-based tablets running Windows RT will sell for $200 to $300 cheaper. That suggests a starting price of $599 for Lenovo's business-oriented <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/tablets/240005282">ThinkPad Tablet 2</a> which will likely be running Windows 8 Pro, the more expensive business license. It would also likely place Lenovo's Windows RT ARM based tablet at $399.</p> <P> <p>Some in the blogosphere have interpreted this to mean that Windows RT tablets will sell for $300, but that's stretching logic. After all, Lenovo can speak only to its own pricing and not tablets in general from other hardware makers. Not all hardware makers will sell Windows 8 Intel tablets for $600+, so it follows that not all Windows RT tablets will sell for $300.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Are $400 Intel-based Windows 8 tablets possible?</p> Acer has hinted at a price of $400 to $800 for its Intel-based Windows 8 tablets depending on the options. The $400 will likely be the starting price of an Intel Clover Trail SoC tablet running Windows 8 and $800 will likely be an Intel Ivy Bridge tablet with a larger screen running Windows 8 Pro. Some people doubt that Intel can be competitive on pricing but they're ignoring the facts. A brand-new Acer netbook running on Intel's latest Cedar Trail dual-core Atom processor <a target="_blank" href="http://www.walmart.com/ip/Acer-Espresso-Black-10.1-AOD270-1824-Netbook-PC-with-Intel-Atom-Dual-Core-N2600-Processor-and-Windows-7-Starter/19714372">sells for $228 at Walmart today</a>. Last year I bought a nice 15.4" laptop for the living room with an Intel Sandy Bridge processor and Windows Home Premium for $268 so it's clear that Intel can and does compete on price. </p> <P> <p>When you talk about consumer-oriented tablets running the cheaper Windows 8 license, then $400 for an <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">Intel SoC based Windows 8 tablet</a> is absolutely possible. There are at least 20 hardware makers using this design and many will be competing fiercely on pricing. The bill of materials for an Intel SoC design will not be drastically higher than an ARM-based tablet. An Acer ARM-based tablet running Android <a target="_blank" href="http://www.walmart.com/ip/Acer-Iconia-Tab-A200-10G08U-10.1-1GHz-8GB-Android-3.2-Honeycomb-OS-Titanium-Gray/19714397">sells for $285 at Walmart</a>, so $400 for a Windows 8 tablet is very feasible and probably more profitable than Android tablets. Moreover, Acer will be able to up-sell a base station that serves as a display stand, a secondary battery, a keyboard, and a trackpad for a list price of $149. Asus pioneered this business model with its Transformer Prime and sells its base stations at a list price of $149, though the discounted street price is closer to $110.</p>2012-08-14T11:30:00ZWindows 8, RT Hardware Will Run For WeeksWindows RT tablets are on the way from Dell, Lenovo, Samsung and Asus, according to Microsoft, as well as Microsoft's own Surface RT. But the really big news? RT and Windows 8 devices will be always on--no more boot up, shutdown, or suspend. In the meantime, beware imitations that claim to be always connected but aren't.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240005434?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p><a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/08/13/collaborating-to-deliver-windows-rt-pcs.aspx">A Monday blog entry</a> by Mike Angiulo, VP of Microsoft's ecosystem and planning team, announced that Acer, Dell, Lenovo, and Samsung are building Windows RT devices. It also added details of some new capabilities in Windows 8 and Windows RT devices. The most exciting? The elimination of the much-hated shutdown feature in Windows, which eliminates the dreaded boot-up process. Both Intel System on Chip (SoC) and ARM devices running Windows 8 and RT devices will support a feature called connected standby, which means they never need to be shut down, suspended, or rebooted.</p> <P> <p>These devices will stay on for over 320 hours at a time without a charge while connected to the network as if they were smartphones on battery steroids. According to <a target="_blank" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/BUILD/BUILD2011/HW-456T">this Microsoft BUILD conference presentation last year</a>, connected standby devices must pass stringent hardware requirements. For example, all connected standby capable devices must have less than 5% battery drain over a 16-hour period in connected standby state and they must have less than 300-millisecond exit latency from the power button press to display on. By comparison, it's a vast improvement over the 100% battery drain on some buggy iPhone 4S smartphones in the same 16-hour period.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Beware fake always-on, connected standby</p> Don't fall for the numerous products being marketed today as having always on, instant on, or connected standby capabilities. They're fake, because they all need to be shut down or suspended and booted or reawakened.<ul><li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/">Google's Chromebook</a>, for instance, claims to have instant on capability but it really means roughly a 15 second boot.</li> <li>Apple touts connected standby in its new Mac OS X, code-named Mountain Lion, but those MacBooks are merely waking every 15 minutes to update email and sync to the cloud. They still need to be suspended or shut down and they are not connected to the network. That means they don't turn on as quickly and don't respond to instant message calls such as Facetime or Skype.</li> <li>HP markets a connected standby feature on some of its notebooks running Windows 7. But it's only running a scheduled wake feature based on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.intel.com/support/services/smartconnect/sb/CS-033108.htm">Intel's Smart Connect Technology</a>. Like Mac OS X Mountain Lion, you still need to suspend or shut down the devices.</li></ul></p> <P> <p>These distinctions are crucial because according to Microsoft's telemetry data a significant percentage of PC users shut down their systems. Perhaps people are worried about battery drain or fear that their systems won't wake correctly from the <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Configuration_and_Power_Interface">ACPI 5.0 S3 suspend state</a>. This shouldn't be a problem on Windows 8 connected standby devices because they won't need or have an off or suspend option and they must be certified to operate on less than 0.078 watts of total standby power drain.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: medium; font-weight:bold; ">Why Windows 8 should be a tablet winner</p> The iPad was a huge success because it was the first always-on mobile device with a sufficiently large screen that offers media consumption, Web surfing, and light data input. The iPad was the first device good enough for most casual computing needs but it has rarely replaced a full computer. Those who try to use the iPad as a primary computing device like corporate sales staff end up demanding keyboard docks like the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/reviews/personal-tech/tablets/240001387">Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover</a>. They also demand features such as printing but can't get full hardware support. iPads can't run the software that the majority of the computing world runs and it can't run Microsoft Office.</p> <P> <p>In contrast, Windows 8 on Intel SoC will be the first full-fledged computing device in a truly mobile form factor rather than just a "media tablet" like the iPad. It will run all Windows applications and run existing and future versions of Microsoft Office. This explains why surveys in the United States and China have shown that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ethicalmohit.com/2011/10/windows-android-or-ios-study-shows.html">customers prefer and are waiting for a Windows tablet</a>. This is why I argued in June that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">Windows 8 running on Intel SoC will be an iPad killer</a>. That might sound overly optimistic but consider the fact that there were roughly 350 million PCs sold last year and roughly 300 million of them were sold with Windows. If only one third of them become tablets--which is not unreasonable because SoC systems should be affordable--Windows easily becomes the tablet market leader.</p> <P>2012-08-09T18:24:00ZUSB Poised To End Power Brick HellThe new USB Power Deliver (USB-PD) standard and several associated standards put USB on a path to being the universal electronics connector, replacing even the power adapter for notebooks. A greater variety of power levels allow it to control and power many more devices, including HDTV, than current standard connectors.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240005233?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Last month, the USB 3.0 Promoter Group announced a new 100-watt power delivery standard called <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usb.org/press/USB_Power_Delivery_Spec_Completion_FINAL_072712.pdf">USB Power Delivery (USB-PD)</a>. This is a massive improvement from the existing 2.5-watt capability and even the unsupported 10.5-watt devices on the market such as the iPad. With <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usb.org/developers/powerdelivery/">USB-PD</a>, and the new <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_High-Definition_Link">Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)-USB standard</a>, which lets USB ports connect to high-definition monitors, USB is poised to become a universal three-in-one connector for tablets and notebooks.</p> <P> <p>The newest MHL-enabled smartphones--and soon tablets--have already implemented this three-in-one capability with a consolidated Micro-USB connector. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?p_id=8805">A $10 MHL USB-HDMI adapter</a> allows these smartphones to connect to existing HDTVs or LCDs that have HDMI ports. But until now, this capability had been missing from notebooks because of the inadequate power supplied by the old USB standard and the lack of MHL support. With USB-PD and MHL, gone will be the bulky HDMI ports and proprietary DC power connectors and everything will be consolidated to the existing USB or Micro-USB port.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-August/USB-PD.jpg" /> <P> <p>To understand why the old USB standard was so stingy on power delivery, first we need to know a little bit about current (ampere), voltage (volt), and power (watt). In laymen's terms, current is the amount of electrical charge delivered per second and voltage is the energy potency of that charge. Power is the amount of energy delivered per second. When we multiply current and voltage, we get power in watts.</p> <P> <p>Many companies inflate their battery capacity by quoting massive amp-hour ratings based on some internal battery voltage of 3.7 volts. The third-generation iPad, for example, claims 11,666 milliamp-hours even though it only contains 43 watt-hours of battery energy which means it can run at something like 4.3 watts for 10 hours. (We derived 43 watt-hours by multiplying 11.666 amp-hours by 3.7 volts.) Yet a 4000 milliamp-hour battery in a notebook such as the ThinkPad X200 contains 57.6 watt-hours of energy because Lenovo bases its amp-hour rating on 14.4 volts. The moral of the story? Higher voltage means more energy bang per amp.</p> <P> <p>The old USB standard was limited to a maximum voltage of 5 volts and a maximum current of 0.5 amps. Five volts multiplied by 0.5 amps equals 2.5 watts maximum power delivery. Most smartphone makers unofficially bumped the maximum current to 2.1 amps using thicker cabling because they needed to deliver 10.5 watts to charge their power-hungry smartphones. This unsupported configuration was fine with a thicker USB cable but it could potentially cause overheating problems for thinner USB cables designed to push 0.5 amps.</p> <P> <p>The new USB-PD standard not only bumps up the maximum current to 5 amperes, it also bumps the maximum voltage up to 20 volts. Five amps times 20 volts produces an astounding 100 watts! Twenty volts was selected because nearly all notebook power connectors operate at between 16 and 20 volts. USB-PD eliminates the need for separate power connectors on notebooks and tablets. So not only will the USB port on a notebook be able to support higher-power devices such as external optical drives without the need to daisy chain two USB connectors to double up on power, the same USB port can reverse direction and pull power from an external source such as a battery or wall socket.</p> <P> <p>Because the USB-PD standard is backward compatible and also needs to be able to support a wide range of lower-power devices, it has the intelligence to detect the cabling and end-point devices to avoid fried circuits and overheated wires. Not all circuits can handle higher voltages and not all wires and connectors can handle higher amperage, so the USB-PD standard supports a wide range of current and voltages through different profiles from which system and device designers can choose:</p> <P> <p><TABLE><TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Original<br />USB Spec</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 0.5A 2.5W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Nonstandard<br />USB</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2.1A 10.5W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Profile 1</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2A 10W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Profile 2</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2A 10W</li><li>12V @ 1.5A 18W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Profile 3</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2A 10W</li><li>12V @ 3A 36W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Profile 4</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2A 10W</li><li>12V @ 3A 36W</li><li>20V @ 3A 60W</li></ul></TD></TR> <TR><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;">Profile 5<br />(Supports only<br />full-size USB<br />connectors)</TD><TD style="font-size: small; border:1px solid black;"><ul><li>5V @ 2A 10W</li><li>12V @ 5A 60W</li><li>20V @ 5A 100W</li><br /></ul></TD></TR></TABLE></p> <P> <p>As you can see, devices with Micro-USB ports can draw only a maximum of 60 watts due to smaller connectors being limited to 3 amperes. That's still a vast improvement over the existing nonstandard solutions. The third-generation iPad, for example, takes nearly seven hours to charge its relatively large 43 watt-hour battery even though the iPad claims the battery is full an hour before it's actually done charging. If future iPads or other tablets bumped up their voltage to 12 volts or more, they could easily halve the charging time.</p> <P> <p>The USB-PD standard also can solve other problems such as excessive cabling for TV sets. Set-top boxes could conceivably use a single MHL-USB connector to connect to an HDTV while drawing up to 100 watts of power. The potential flexibility means that USB could become the de facto power connector for all sorts of electronics devices and end our collective DC adapter hell. Wall plates could be replaced with combination AC sockets and USB-PD enabled ports. Many airports already are doing this with normal USB sockets for smaller devices, and you can buy wall plates and <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/video/personal-tech/peripherals/232301466">power strips with USB</a>. But USB-PD means that the heavy notebook chargers we've lugged around for the last 30 years finally could become a thing of the past.</p>2012-08-01T08:02:00ZEmail List Stolen From Hacked Dropbox EmployeeAn employee's Dropbox account with an insecure password was compromised. A list of user e-mails from that account was used in a spam campaign. The company recommends users get a password manager such as 1password, norton password manager, roboform, or lastpass.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240004675?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Dropbox has acknowledged that <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.dropbox.com/index.php/security-update-new-features/">one of its employees' Dropbox accounts was hacked</a>. The hacked Dropbox account contained a list of customer emails and those users were, in turn, sent spam. According to <a target="_blank" href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/07/17/dropbox-users-targeted-by-spam-possible-address-leak-to-blame/">a report in TechCrunch</a>, some users reported that email accounts receiving the spam were only used for Dropbox, which raised suspicion that Dropbox was hacked. This led Dropbox to investigate the issue, and the investigation revealed that one of their employees had been hacked along with other Dropbox accounts.</p> <P> <p>Dropbox asserts that usernames and passwords were hacked on other unnamed websites and that these credentials were the same as those used in the hacked Dropbox accounts. While this diverts much blame away from Dropbox, the problem remains that Dropbox employees were using unencrypted email lists stored on the public Internet with minimal security.</p> <P> <p>To improve security, Dropbox will soon implement a new two-factor authentication system that involves sending Dropbox users temporary codes to their cell phones. They will also scan for suspicious activity and give users access to a monitoring page that lets you examine all active logins to your account. Dropbox will also prompt users to change less secure passwords or passwords that haven't changed in a long time. That may annoy users with strong one-time use passwords that don't really need to be changed over time, but it is considered best practice.</p> <P> <p>Dropbox also suggests to its users that they should use password management tools so that they can use a unique password on every website they visit. As for the user list stored in an employee Dropbox account the company only says that they "...have put additional controls in place to help make sure it doesn't happen again."</p>2012-07-26T10:18:00ZWindows RT Won't Run Some Old PrintersWindows on ARM was always going to need a lot of new driver work, but it appears that Microsoft's commitment to supporting devices on the low-cost Windows version is tentative. Only some printers will be supported.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240004406?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>At the risk of beating a dead horse, I'm going to reiterate my position that Windows RT (a version of Windows 8 that only runs on ARM processors) and Surface for Windows RT <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240002530">will be nonstarters</a>. We already knew that Windows RT will not run existing Windows applications but Microsoft has just confirmed that there will be a <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/07/25/simplifying-printing-in-windows-8.aspx">reduction in printer support</a>.</p> <P> <p>Windows RT will only support "in-box printer drivers" which means that some printers that consumers and businesses already own or might buy in the future won't natively support Windows RT. What this also implies that other non-printer devices will also not work in Windows RT unless they are deemed common enough to be ported from an x86/x64 platform to an ARM hardware platform. In the case of RT, Microsoft says the limited printer support was in order to simplify the printer code on the device so as to minimize system resources used by it.</p> <P> <p>This may be a moot point since it's doubtful that a Windows tablet/notebook that doesn't run Windows applications with or without full device driver support can find much success in the market place. I can see the sales associate at Best Buy explaining to customers that "yes it's a Windows tablet/notebook but it won't support any of your existing Windows applications and it might not work with some of your existing hardware peripherals". I'm sure that will go over real well with customers and the customer service manager. In contrast, <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/07/25/simplifying-printing-in-windows-8.aspx">Microsoft confirmed</a> that legacy print drivers for Windows 2000, XP, Vista, and Windows 7 will still be "fully supported in Windows 8 for device compatibility reasons".</p> <P> <p>Some might point out that the iPad and Android Tablets (which Windows RT hopes to challenge) have zero print driver support out of the box and require additional tools and printer proxies to give them some limited printing support. The problem for Windows RT is that the reason many Microsoft customers held out for Windows Tablet OS is that they wanted to avoid throwing out their old applications and existing devices. Those tablet holdouts can opt for a Windows 8 tablet running on Intel Clover Trail SoC hardware and get all the benefits of an ARM based tablet like always-on all-day battery life while maintaining full legacy application and device compatibility.</p> <P> <p>Because surveys have shown that customers in the United States and China <a href="http://www.ethicalmohit.com/2011/10/windows-android-or-ios-study-shows.html">prefer and are waiting for a Windows tablet</a>, I've predicted that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">Win8 on Intel-SoC will be an iPad killer</a>. What I meant by "killer" is that Windows 8 on Clover Trail devices will outsell iPads when no other tablet has come even close. Since my prediction, we've learned that there is a <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240003491">high probability of a cheaper and smaller iPad</a>. So I will have to clarify my prediction that Win8 on Intel-SoC devices will outsell full size iPad devices because cheaper mini tablets belong in a different product category.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-July/windows8.jpg" /> <P>2012-07-11T10:35:00ZWhy An iPad Mini Now Makes SenseThings have changed. Amazon's experience with the Kindle Fire and the Nexus 7 from Google provide market research for Apple. A smaller iPad would be good for for them now. tablet, mini, samsung, galaxy tabhttp://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240003491?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>When news broke last week of a <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/tablets/240003168">miniature 7.85 inch iPad going to manufacturing</a>, we heard a collective sigh from bloggers: "not this rumor again". If the report had come from a less-reputable source, I would have likely brushed this off as well.</p> <P> <p>But this time it's different because the market environment is significantly different with the launch of the Asus-built Google Nexus 7. Moreover, the report comes from the <a target="_blank"href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304141204577506471913819412.html"> Wall Street Journal</a>, which might as well be the official leak outlet for Apple. This leak not only pacifies investors who fear that Apple might cede the rapidly growing miniature tablet market to competitors; it also dampens sales of the Nexus 7 because some customers would wait for an Apple mini tablet.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012_June/BYTE_Apple_ipad.png" /> <P> <p>Doubters predictably will point out that the great Steve Jobs has said that there is no market for a miniature tablet, but they conveniently forget how many times Jobs and Apple quickly changed their minds. Now, it's also silly to expect Apple's Tim Cook to say something to the effect that miniature tablets are wonderful and you should buy our competitor's products while we sit this one out. The reality is that Apple will do what makes sense from a business perspective and they were likely testing and developing a mini tablet even as Apple publicly disparages the form factor.</p> <P> <p>Up until this point, Apple simply wasn't under pressure to produce a lower margin but higher volume mini tablet. Apple had the luxury of milking its higher margin 9.8-inch tablets while its competitors fielded lackluster products. With RIM asking $500 for a 7" tablet, Apple must have thought RIM's boardroom was on crack (actually, that would explain a lot...). Barnes and Noble did a little better when it fielded a somewhat crippled $250 Android tablet that hardly anyone knew about and Amazon fielded a crippled $199 Android tablet that still managed to push some decent volume based on the strength of the Kindle brand.</p> <P> <p>Now that Goggle is getting serious and fielded a $199 7-inch full fledged Android tablet that's actually good, Apple can't afford to allow this market to remain unchallenged. As <a target="_blank"href="http://daringfireball.net/2012/07/this_ipad_mini_thing">John Gruber</a> pointed out, Apple has learned from its mistakes in the past and they will no longer leave a "price umbrella" for competitors.</p> <P> <p>The logical course of action for Apple is to sell a mini iPad that is slightly larger but sleeker than the Google Nexus 7, and sell it at a slightly higher price justified by Apple's brand and larger App market. While $299 might leave too much of a "price umbrella" for Google, $249 still leaves Apple with respectable margins. Also, Apple can make even more with expensive accessories and storage upgrades. More importantly, Apple could potentially grow their tablet market several fold by offering a more affordable iPad. NPD has predicted that the tablet market will grow 4-fold in the next 5 years to 400 million units a year and if Apple has its way, most or at least some of those units will carry a fruit logo.</p>2012-06-22T08:59:00ZWhy Microsoft Must Stop the Surface Madness<em>BYTE</em> contributor George Ou got blowback when he predicted Microsoft's Surface tablets would fail. Well, he's standing his ground. Hanging with the cool Mac guy is just going to alienate all the PC customers who have made Microsoft great.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240002530?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p><div style="margin:0; padding: 0 5px 5px 0; width:220px; float:right; text-align:center;"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-June/Microsoft-Surface/Apple-PC-Ads.jpg" alt="I'm a PC, I'm a Mac" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></div>Hey, Microsoft, have you forgotten me? I'm a PC, the customer who actually loves his Windows computer. It wasn't long ago that you inundated me with "I'm a PC" ads that stood up to that smug fellow who called himself a Mac on TV. <P> Now, it seems that I'm no longer cool enough to hang with you because you're too busy <a target="_blank" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/video-surface-vs-ipad-microsofts-getting-rusty-at-stealing-from-apple.php">trying to copy the guys who used to make fun of us</a>. Oh, you can try to blame the editing, but you're embarrassing yourself with your new Surface tablets while betraying your business partners and your customers who all believed and invested in the PC "Wintel" ecosystem.</p> <P> <p>Supporters of Microsoft's Surface are giving me a lot of heat for <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/tablets/240002303">calling the new Microsoft Surface products failures</a> when I merely make some factual observations. They tell me that I should be content with the Metro App store and be content with a tablet lacking Windows x86 compatibility, which is the very essence of being a PC. But be careful of what you wish for, because if all that PC users wanted was the superior tablet with the dominant app store, they would have ditched Microsoft and bought an iPad long ago.</p> <P> <p>The market has been littered with the corpses of HP TouchPads, the RIM Playbook, and other overpriced or subpar Android devices slain by the mighty iPad. Despite the lessons history has shown us, Microsoft inexplicably is walking down that same path to ruin. Microsoft's Surface for Windows 8 RT tablet has more in common with a three-year-old iPad while lacking compatibility with the existing PC ecosystem: Windows apps and hardware.</p> <P> <p>The Surface for Windows 8 Pro tablet, which is Windows compatible, will be sold at "competitive Ultrabook pricing." That means it will be too bulky and too expensive for a tablet. Its poor battery life means we will have to carry a bulky AC adapter and crawl around looking for an open electrical outlet. The failures of the Tablet PC should have taught Microsoft that mobility is crucial. The iPad succeeded where all the tablets before it failed simply by meeting battery life expectations and size requirements and ditching the easy-to-lose stylus. </p> <P> <p>What's unfortunate is that Microsoft is undermining its hardware partners who have already committed to buying Windows 8 in droves by confusing the message. The traditional PC makers apparently won't get the "Surface" branding, while at the same time they could be tarred by association if Surface leaves a lasting bad impression on consumers. Over 20 PC makers have <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/240001467">committed</a> to a hybrid design <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">vastly superior to the iPad</a>. These hybrid devices have a base that serves as a hard screen protector, a tactile keyboard, single-action open, a variable-angle display stand, and a second battery that doubles battery life. Instead of promoting the good design settled on by PC makers, Microsoft will submit two inferior designs that could overshadow the good design. Thanks to the Surface tablets, the picture for Windows 8 tablets now looks like thi:</p> <P> <p><ul><li>Typical PC maker design = Windows 8 + Intel SoC = PC with mobility</li><li>Surface for Windows 8 RT = Windows 8 + ARM = Mobility without the PC</li><li>Surface for Windows 8 Pro = Windows 8 + Intel Notebook chip = PC without mobility</li></ul> <P> <p>A PC with mobility is precisely what is needed to save the PC and usher it into the "PC plus" era and save it from the post PC era. Microsoft needs to stop pushing the choices of mobility without PC compatibility or PCs without the mobility.</p> <P> <iframe width="452" height="254" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dpzu3HM2CIo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>2012-06-19T12:05:00ZWhy Microsoft's New Surface Tablets Will FailMicrosoft's two new tablets, Surface for Windows RT and Surface for Windows 8 Pro, are doomed for different reasons. The RT tablet can't run Windows apps, and the Pro tablet is big and heavy with lousy battery life.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240002303?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>I am on record predicting that Windows 8 will be a huge success because of <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">hybrid tablet-notebooks</a> and <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001746">superior battery life</a>. Despite this, it is apparent to me that the two new tablets announced by Microsoft on Monday called Surface both will fail miserably because neither product can deliver anything that users actually want. How do I know this? Because <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2012/jun12/06-18announce.aspx">Microsoft's Surface spec sheet</a> tells me.</p> <P> <p>The two Surface tablets are called Surface for Windows RT and Surface for Windows 8 Pro. Right off the bat, the naming is confusing and too hard to pronounce or remember but that's the least of Microsoft's problems. For readability, I'll refer to the two products as Surface RT and Surface Pro henceforth.</p> <P> <p>Surface RT is the Microsoft tablet running Windows 8 RT for ARM architecture CPUs from Qualcomm, NVIDIA, and Texas Instruments. Surface Pro is the Microsoft tablet based on an Intel Ivy Bridge platform running Windows 8 for Intel or AMD x86/x64 architecture.</p> <P> <p>Windows RT cannot run any existing Windows applications and there might even be driver compatibility issues. That's right, a "Windows" tablet computer that doesn't run Windows. I can just visualize the sales associate at Best Buy trying to explain this to the customer, saying, "Yeah, it's a Windows computer that doesn't run Windows--you have to buy stuff at the Microsoft App Store." I can also visualize the look on a customer's face who just bought a Windows RT tablet only to fire up their favorite game or application and realize that it won't run.</p> <P> <p>It seems that Microsoft has forgotten the nightmare of Windows Vista over relatively minor compatibility issues with a few legacy applications and device drivers or the Vista Capable fiasco. If Microsoft thought Vista was bad, wait till people get a load of Surface RT. </p> <P> <p>As for the hardware specs, Surface RT has more in common with the first iPad than the iPad 2, much less the latest iPad. The weight and thickness are very similar to the original iPad's; the iPad 2 is so much thinner. The resolution will be less than 1920 by 1080 pixels while the new iPad has the stunning Retina Display of 2048 by 1536 pixels. With these specs and an App store that's starting virtually from scratch, or maybe 100,000 apps if Windows Phone 7 Apps run unmodified on Windows 8 RT--and that's a huge if--Surface RT has significantly less economic value to consumers than the iPad 2, which costs a mere $399. Will Surface RT sell for significantly less than $399? I doubt it. If it doesn't sell well below $399, it will have about as much success as the HP TouchPad.</p> <P> <p>The Surface Pro specs are better. It has a full HD--that is, 1920 by 1080 pixels resolution--screen and uses an Intel Ivy Bridge x86/x64 chip, so it will at least run all existing Windows applications and drivers. The problem is that the Surface Pro uses a processor meant for larger and more power-hungry laptops. That means it's too heavy and too thick, with much shorter battery life than ARM or Intel Clover Trail SoC tablets, and it lacks always-on for running weeks at a time. Moreover, it will likely have to be priced in the ultrabook category, putting it in the $800-and-up range, which is far too expensive to move in volume. With weak specs and high prices, it likely will fail for the same reasons tablet PCs have failed for the last 11 years.</p> <P> <p>For reasons unclear to me, it seems that Microsoft is hell bent on building an irrelevant product when its primary customers--the OEM and ODM PC makers--<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/240001467">are buying Windows 8 in droves</a> to use in products running Intel's Clover Trail platform. Those PC makers aren't stupid and they're delivering affordable products with great battery life, always-on capability, and full Windows compatibility. Microsoft, on the other hand, has announced two products that completely miss the mark.</p>2012-06-14T12:44:00ZLogitech ConferenceCam BCC950: Easy, Quality VideoconferencingWith the exception of a few fixable design flaws, I am very pleased with the Logitech ConferenceCam BCC950. Pair it up with any 40+ inch 1080P HDTV with a VESA mounted fanless embedded computer running Skype and the solution could rival some business class "telepresence" solutions. Not only will you save a ton of money, you will be able to easily reach beyond your own corporate Intranet and avoid all the protocol incompatibilities plaguing the expensive telepresence systems. webcam, uc, unified communicationshttp://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240002036?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>In this era of glorified videoconferencing solutions, marketed as "immersive telepresence" and being sold for the price of a home, many businesses and organizations simply want an easy and affordable solution. Logitech's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/en-us/for-business/products/webcams/Conferencecam">ConferenceCam BCC950</a>, a combination webcam and speakerphone, addresses this market. The ConferenceCam largely delivers on the promise of being easy and affordable but it comes with some minor design annoyances.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Video quality</p> The most important feature in a product like this is the video quality, and the $249.99 ConferenceCam delivers some of the best webcam video I have ever seen. Though not movie-grade 1080P, it's amazing for a package this small.</p> <P> <p>In a room well lit with natural light, the camera delivers minimal noise and reasonably detailed 1920x1080 resolution video with smooth frame rates. In low light, the frame rates drop, but the 1080P video still looks good.</p> <P> <iframe width="620" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7LPUIIn5KoE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#990000; font-weight:bold;font-style: roman; text-align:right;">The ConferenceCam BCC950 delivers smooth, sharp video.</div> <P> <p>At $250, the ConferenceCam seems expensive compared to 1080P webcams that are a quarter of the price. But those cheaper alternatives offer less detail or have artifact problems. For instance, as you can see in the sample video below made with my own personal camera, the Creative Live! Socialize HD 720p, the video is nowhere near as sharp as the ConferenceCam's. It's even too pixelated to be considered 720P. (I have not tested the Creative Socialize 1080P.)</p> </p> <P> <iframe width="620" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1UyuNhJ_ucI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#990000; font-weight:bold;font-style: roman; text-align:right;">The Creative Live! Socialize HD 720p could have smoother video.</div> <P> <p>Based on the review below, the detail, frame rate, and rolling shutter artifacts of the Microsoft LifeCam Studio 1080P all seem inferior to my Logitech sample, but some of that might be due to inferior lighting. Still, the Logitech ConferenceCam seems to deliver cleaner results in low light and contains the rolling shutter effect better. I will update this comparison when I get a chance to test the Microsoft LifeCam Studio 1080P myself.</p> <P> <iframe width="620" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vc8Punos8kc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#990000; font-weight:bold;font-style: roman; text-align:right;">Microsoft LifeCam Studio 1080P seems inferior to the Logitech ConferenceCam, especially in low light.</div><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Sound quality</p> The sound quality of a conferencing solution is arguably more important than video quality because users are less forgiving about audio problems. The speakerphone on the Logitech ConferenceCam BCC950 seems to filter noise and feedback very well. <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-June/Logitech-ConferenceCam-BCC950/BCC950-test.wav">Here's a sample recording of the ConferenceCam BCC950 mic</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-June/Logitech-ConferenceCam-BCC950/VF0690-test.wav">a noisier sample of the Creative Socialize HD 720P mic</a>.</p> <P> <p>My only complaint about the BCC950 audio is that the filtering seems to overly compress the dynamic range and bass of the voice. However, that seems like an acceptable tradeoff because noise filtering is crucial for audio conferencing.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Design glitches</p> The Logitech ConferenceCam has a few design flaws. For instance, the neck that holds up the camera should either be longer, or a flexible cable. This would let you mount the camera above your screen and the speakerphone below it. The way it's set up now forces you to keep the camera to the side of the screen, which makes it difficult to face the camera while looking at the screen.</p> <P> <p>My biggest objection, though, is having to deal with two separate USB cables, one of which uses a round plug on the speakerphone side. One thick USB cable with an extra power conductor with a second USB connector daisy chained from the first USB connector--a design often found in portable DVD burners--would have been better. Though it's possible to tie the two cables together, it's a step that users should not have to do. <b><i>[Update:]</i></b>As a saving grace, the cables do come with convenient Velcro ties to tidy up the wiring. Furthermore, Logitech also provides an AC adapter for plugging the power port into the wall socket.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-June/Logitech-ConferenceCam-BCC950/conferencecam.jpg" /> <P> <p>For the price of the ConferenceCam, Logitech should really offer a consolidated USB cable and an alternative camera mount that allows the camera orb to sit on top of a monitor.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Remote control</p> The ConferenceCam also comes with a remote to control the mechanical pan, digital zoom, sound, and Skype call functions such as call and hangup. Unfortunately, there is no way to have the arrow buttons serve double duty as a Skype navigation system and you still need a separate mouse to control Skype. That being the case, I would have preferred a way to easily control the camera using a mouse through some hot-button and pop-up interface.</p> <P> <p>The pan tilts the camera up, down, left, and right with a fair degree of range. Left-right pan is close to 180 degrees but it will not let the camera swing all the way around and see what's behind. Up and down is less than 90 degrees but it offers plenty of coverage for conventional uses.</p> <P> <p>The digital zoom feature is a bit less useful because it relies on cropping the image sensor and software interpolation to magnify the cropped image. The native lens magnification seems optimal for one person four to five feet away or three people 10 to 15 feet away so digital zoom seems mostly unnecessary.</p> <P> Name: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/en-us/for-business/products/webcams/Conferencecam">Logitech ConferenceCam BCC950</a><blockquote><i>With the exception of a few fixable design flaws, the Logitech ConferenceCam BCC950 is a pleasing videocam. Pair it with any 40-inch 1080P HDTV with a VESA mounted <a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5849/loigic-supply-lgx-ag150-fanless-system-review-cedar-trail-or-cedar-trial">fanless embedded computer</a> running Skype and the solution could rival some business class "telepresence" solutions. Not only will you save a ton of money, you will be able to easily reach beyond your own corporate Intranet and avoid all the protocol incompatibilities plaguing the expensive telepresence systems.</i></blockquote> Price: $249.99<br> Pro:<ul><li>Best 1080P image quality for webcams so far.</li><li>Good noise cancellation for clean audio recording.</li><li>Good sound output from speakers.</li><li> Reasonable price for the quality.</li></ul> Cons:<ul><li>Poor cable management.</li><li>Remote control design could be better.</li><li>Audio recordings sound narrow on frequency response.</li><li>Needs alternative mount so camera can be placed on top of monitor.</li></ul> <P>2012-06-11T08:30:00ZWindows 8 Hybrids Will Surpass iPad Battery LifeForrester predicted that the iPad would become our primary computing device, but that was based on mistaken assumptions about the ability of Windows and Intel to catch up on hardware. In fact, Clover Trail notebooks and tablets will leapfrog iPad.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240001746?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>Intel last Tuesday announced <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/240001467">over 20 design wins</a> from OEMs and ODMs for its "Clover Trail" hybrid tablet/notebook platform and it's easy to see why. I recently explained why <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/240001444">Windows 8 and Clover Trail will be an iPad killer</a>. Intel confirmed for me the next day that Clover Trail will indeed have the killer feature of always-on computing.</p> <P> <p><div style="margin:0; padding: 0 8px 8px 0; width:298px; float:left; text-align:center;"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-June/CloverTrail/Clovertrail-always-on.png"alt="same as caption" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></div>When Intel says always on, it doesn't mean "instant-on" like a Google Chromebook, which can take over <a target="_blank" href="http://chromebook-os.com/2012/04/google-increasing-chromebook-speed-in-the-future/">eight seconds</a> to boot. Nobody cares about instant-on because nobody wants to boot a device once they've used a tablet or smartphone. <P> By contrast, Clover Trail devices can remain on and connected to the network, which Intel calls "connected standby". And based on <a target="_blank" href="http://software.intel.com/sites/billboard/sites/default/files/downloads/Developing for Microsoft Windows 8 on Intel architecture based tablets and hybrids BJ12_TABS001_102_ENGf.pdf">these Intel IDF slides</a>, Clover Trail can remain on for approximately 30 days. Always-on computing will eliminate the despised boot process, and the extended battery life will eliminate the need for bulky AC adapter bricks and power cords.</p> <P> <p>The Chromebook, on the other hand, must be shut down and rebooted or suspended and awakened like a traditional notebook computer. It doesn't listen or respond to the network when another computer is calling it on Skype or any other application. The Chromebook and notebooks also typically offer less than half of the 10 hours one can expect from an iPad. Clover Trail not only will match the iPad's battery life, but it can nearly double it when the tablet is connected to the base which includes a variable-angle stand, a screen cover, an auxiliary battery, a keyboard, a trackpad, and possibly more storage and connectivity options.</p> <P> <p>Forrester predicted in April that <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.forrester.com/frank_gillett/12-04-23-why_tablets_will_become_our_primary_computing_device">iPads will become our primary computing devices</a>. That prediction was based on the assumption that the iPad will maintain its lead in always-on capability and battery life. And that assumption was shockingly wrong, given how long analysts had known about Intel's x86 mobility plans. PCs are on the verge of surpassing the iPad in battery life and always-on capability and they are poised to solve the keyboard/cover problem better than any iPad accessory ever did.</p>2012-06-04T14:45:00ZWindows 8, Intel Atom SoC Will Be iPad KillerWindows and Intel might finally have their iPad killer: Acer's Iconia W510. The dockable tablet promises to be the first of a new breed of powerful Windows tablets that run on Intel's Atom Z2760 dual-core System-on-Chip. It will have full Windows notebook capabilities as well, and excellent battery life.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240001444?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Authors<p>When Intel announced its <a target="_blank" href="http://software.intel.com/sites/billboard/sites/default/files/downloads/Developing%20for%20Microsoft%20Windows%208%20on%20Intel%20architecture%20based%20tablets%20and%20hybrids%20BJ12_TABS001_102_ENGf.pdf">Windows 8 Tablet check list</a> running on a soon-to-be-released Intel Atom Z2760 dual-core System on Chip (SoC), the reaction was mild enthusiasm with a healthy dose of skepticism. Intel said that Intel Windows 8 tablets would come with 10- or 11-inch screens, measure less than 9 mm thick, weigh less than 1.5 lbs, and offer more than nine hours of battery. The typical reaction was disbelief because no Intel notebook or netbook has ever come close to being as thin and light as an iPad with the battery life of an iPad.</p> <P> <p>Conventional wisdom among tech pundits held that Intel can't match tablets running ARM architecture processors because Intel had never delivered anything close to such a product. Intel-based Microsoft Tablet PCs were too heavy at over three pounds, too expensive with prices between $1,000 and $3,000, too short on battery life, and too inconvenient with an OS that had to be shut down or suspended. With Intel and Microsoft having a miserable 11-year track record in the tablet computing space and the fact that not much was known about the mystery Intel Atom Z2760 "Clover Trail" processor, all the skepticism was warranted.</p> <P> <p>Now that we can actually see <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/03/acer-iconia-w700-w510-windows-8/">hands-on product videos</a> of the Acer Iconia W510 ($400 to $800 range) transformable tablet with 18 hours battery life in docked mode, it's clear that Intel was not bluffing. <em>PC World</em> reports that the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/256725/acer_shows_off_windows_8_tablets_at_computex.html">Iconia uses an Intel SoC</a>. That makes sense given the fact that there is no way a full-size notebook chip can even fit into a 9-mm-thin detachable chassis that also has to accommodate an LCD panel and achieve phenomenal battery life. And because Intel announced last month that Intel SoC Windows 8 tablets will use the Atom Z2760, it's almost a certainty that the Acer Iconia W510 is based on this design.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">Clover Trail architecture revealed</p> <P> <p>The most intriguing aspect of this product is that it promises a quantum leap in Windows notebook battery life. However, the big question is always on functionality like it has been with the iPad and Android tablets running on ARM processors. To answer this question we need to know more about the Intel Atom Z2760 processor, so I sent a media inquiry to Intel more than a week ago. Intel has yet to respond and not much has been reported about the Z2760 or "Clover Trail". Microsoft deepened the mystery by only <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hightechforum.org/the-evolution-of-the-wintel-pc-to-be-revealed/">showing bulky test rigs</a> with low battery life at the 2011 Build conference. Microsoft has only revealed that Windows 8 running on ARM will have always-on capability.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-June/Intel-Atom-Soc_Tablet.jpg" /> <P> <p>The only existing Intel product that can achieve this phenomenal battery life is the Intel Atom Z2460 "Medfield". Medfield is a 32nm single-core Intel SoC running PowerVR SGX 540 graphics and it is the first Intel processor to successfully launch in a smartphone. Despite its single-core architecture, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5262/intel-shows-off-competitive-medfield-x86-android-power-performance">Medfield still manages good performance</a> compared to tablets but will likely seem underpowered in a hybrid notebook/tablet. That led me to suspect that the Atom Z2760 is very similar to the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5592/intel-atom-z2580-z2000">already announced Atom Z2580</a>, which is a dual-core version of Medfield running the more advanced PowerVR SGX 544MP2 graphics technology.</p> <P> <p>To verify my suspicions, I turned to David Kanter of <a target="_blank" href="http://realworldtech.com/">Real World Tech</a> who is the go-to expert analyst on the chip industry. Kanter said Clover Trail is one of the successors to Intel Medfield and it will indeed have always-on capability. He added that the Z2580 and Z2760 are likely close relatives with a few differences in graphics, I/O options, frequency, thermal, and power limits. More specifically, the graphics (still PowerVR) in the Z2760 will have to support DirectX because it's meant for the Windows market.</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">An iPad killer is born</p> <P> <p>Without a full review or at least the full specifications on the Acer Iconia W510, we can't know for certain what processor it will use or how it will perform in real life. But all the evidence points to a hybrid notebook/tablet that seems poised to converge the tablet and notebook space. Unlike ARM-based Windows 8 tablets that will not be able to run any existing Windows software or support enterprise requirements such as Windows Active Directory, Windows 8 running on Intel SoC promises a bridge between the past and the future.</p> <P> <p>You can undock the Iconia W510 and run native Metro apps and Windows desktop applications (even if there might be some user interface challenges). Dock the tablet into the keyboard and trackpad, and you have a full-fledged Windows laptop with phenomenal 18-hour battery life. Intel and Microsoft are betting their future on the fact that their hybrid beats carrying an iPad in addition to a notebook. Other recent efforts, such as <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/commentary/personal-tech/tablets/232900655">Intel's Cove Point, might not be iPad killers</a>, but Clover Trail on Windows 8 looks like a pretty good challenger.</p>