InformationWeek Stories by Serdar Yegulalphttp://www.informationweek.comInformationWeeken-usCopyright 2012, UBM LLC.2013-04-15T09:00:00ZNine Things Smartwatches Need To SucceedApple, Samsung and Google are all rumored to be working on smartwatches. Here are nine things we think any smartwatch worth its salt (and silicon) needs.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/mobile-applications/nine-things-smartwatches-need-to-succeed/240152858?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Apple, Samsung and Google are all rumored to be working on smartwatches. With all the buzz about these devices, it's hard to see the real use cases through all the hype. Here's nine things we think any smartwatch worth its salt (and silicon) needs:</p> <P> <p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">1. There should be more than a consumer use case for them.</p> <P> <p>It wouldn't hurt &mdash; and it would almost certainly help &mdash; for our future lineups of smart watches to provide things that are valuable in an enterprise setting. Add NFC (which would be trivially easy at this point) and you have a two-factor authentication system. Ditto an edge-mounted fingerprint reader: Imagine being able to log into any computer by swiping your thumb along the side of the watch. </p> <P> <p>The poster child for smartwatches now is the Android-based <a target="_blank" href="http://getpebble.com/">Pebble E-Paper Watch</a>, which looks promising. It mostly takes the "mini smartphone" angle. <a target="_blank" href="http://developer.getpebble.com/android/intents">The Pebble SDK just recently became available.</a></p> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">2. They have to be used by people who don't wear watches, or who are going to do more with them than go jogging.</p> <P> <p>Most smartwatches up to this point have been either gimmick-gadgets (see the next point below) or glorified health monitors. There's nothing wrong with having a smartwatch serve as a sports band &mdash; and odds are that functionality will be included by default &mdash; but that can't be the only selling point.</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/puuikibeach/8569118147/">puuikibeach on Flickr</a></div><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">3. They have to avoid the mistakes of history.</p> <P> <p>Too many of the smartwatches sold up to this point have been overpriced, ugly, clunky, with poor battery life (see below) and an indiscriminate package of functionality &mdash; essentially glorified proof-of-concept devices. A smartwatch that sports a major brand name can't be redolent of something that was funded through Kickstarter. (No offense to the Kickstarter projects out there.)</p><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">4. They can't be too heavy.</p> <P> <p>The size of the watch, on the other hand, is another issue. Large, flat watches have worked as a fashion accessory for some time now. In fact, a flat display that covers a fair part of the forearm might well be quite useful given that...</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephendann/3409153062/">Dr Stephen Dann on Flickr</a></div> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">5. They have to sport functionality that is actually worthwhile in such a form factor.</p> <P> <p>Most of the head-scratching about what smartwatches could do revolves around how the size of the display and the general level of minimalism for the whole device constrains the kinds of interactions you can have with it. We're used to what can be done with a smartphone display a few inches across, but a smartwatch's smaller and inherently less functional display is going to be a designer's &mdash; and engineer's &mdash; challenge to make useful. Good luck.</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nateone/94295125/">nateOne on Flickr</a></div> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">6. They have to be something both sexes will use.</p> <P> <p>Watches are fashion statements for both men and women, and a well-designed one can be complementary to either of them. Again, the iPhone: its straightforward design lent itself to being a unisex fashion statement, and it could be customized as needed with a case. In a watch's case, you could swap in a different wristband or shroud.</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/janitors/8531347272/">Janitors on Flickr</a></div> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">7. They have to be able to support a full day's use on a single charge, and charge conveniently.</p> <P> <p>Digital watches could go for months, sometimes years on end with a single battery. Today's cell phones barely make it through the day without keeling over. A smartwatch can't afford to have as bad a track record with power consumption, lest people feel they now have two things that can die on them instead of just one.</p> <P> <p>And as far as charging goes, here's yet another no-brainer use case for wireless charging. Instead of fumbling with a watch and a really tiny connection port covered by some flimsy rubber plug, why not just take the watch off, dump it on a charging mat next to one's desk or bed, and forget about it?</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vishay/7545650372/">Vishay Intertechnology on Flickr</a></div> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">8. They can't cost more than $99.</p> <P> <p>If smartwatches are going to be an accessory rather than a central device, they can't cost more than what people would pay for an accessory &mdash; e.g., a high-end headset or a Bluetooth keyboard. Ninety-nine dollars is about the upper limit for such a thing. Charge more than that and you're asking people to buy something that must also work as a standalone device.</p> <P> <div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Photo credit to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/25730976@N06/8513146935/">conxa.roda on Flickr</a></div> <P><p STYLE="font-size: large; font-weight:bold; ">9. They have to be as device- and service-neutral as possible.</p> <P> <p>If watches are auxiliary devices, they need to work with as broad a range of things as possible. Apple might be able to get away with introducing something that only works with iOS, but a company like Samsung would have a harder time expecting people to live with such lock-in.</p> <P>2013-04-05T14:33:00ZFacebook Home: You Are the Product Being SoldFacebook Home, their Android skin, is an attempt to grab hold of users and not let them go, to make them think that there is nothing out there but Facebook.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/social-networking/facebook-home-you-are-the-product-being/240152398?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>I'll say this for Facebook. They will never stop finding ways to appall me.</p> <P> <p>Facebook Home, the new branded edition of Android that is being rolled out in conjunction with various phone vendors&mdash; HTC most prominent among them&mdash; is even more disturbing than I imagined. </p> <P> <p>The idea is simple enough. Facebook has created an Android 4.1-powered launcher and phone environment, which will be released on a number of phones offered at low price points ($99 for the HTC First, for instance). The main UI for Home, called Coverfeed, is a full-screen stream of updates and contact notifications&mdash; a giant Facebook skin.</p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/4/4183172/facebook-home-android">The Verge put it this way</a>: "Facebook wants to make your phone a lot more like your News Feed."</p> <P> <img alt="Facebook Home Coverfeed" title="Facebook Home Coverfeed" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-April/facebook-home-feed.jpg" /> <P> <p>Putting aside what an appalling concept this is&mdash; have you <em>seen</em> what a ghastly, disorganized, unsortable mess Facebook News Feeds are?&mdash; the first thing I find interesting is why HTC is participating in this when it is attempting to do something vaguely similar with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-claims-best-phone-ever-made/240148856">the new version of the HTC One</a>. That phone features "BlinkFeed", a homepage news stream app, custom-built for the phone. It doesn't consume RSS, but rather a proprietary update format which HTC has enlisted a whole roster of websites to provide for them.</p> <P> <p>See, I didn't think BlinkFeed was a terrible idea, just not a particularly good one. After all, why reinvent RSS? I suspect everything BlinkFeed does could have been accomplished with RSS or Atom, plus maybe some existing semantic markup.</p> <P> <p>But Facebook Home isn't just about reinventing the wheel. It's aimed at scrapping it entirely.</p> <P> <p>Facebook's long-term ambition has been twofold. First, to become the de facto front end for the web&mdash; to become a portal not just to the lives of your buddies, but to everything else that is on the web in the first place. (There is remarkably little discussion about Facebook eclipsing Google as a search engine, maybe because nobody thinks the subject is worth taking seriously; they need to reconsider.) The second step is to replace the web entirely&mdash; to take every piece of functionality that we've normally associated with the rest of the web, from picture storage to news aggregation to messaging&mdash; and reincarnate it inside Facebook's ad-driven walled garden.</p> <P> <p>Facebook Home is yet another way to do that. By giving people a low-entry-level device that's essentially a front end for Facebook&mdash; or a convenient all-in-one fullscreen app&mdash; they make it easier for people to dispense with dealing with any other part of the web that's not Facebook. They don't have to block anything explicitly; they just have to make the Home experience so immersive, and offer so much through it, that after a while you don't feel the need to touch anything else. And given that I have friends who barely know a web that exists outside of Facebook, that's really unnerving.</p> <P> <p>What I'm reminded of, more than anything else, is the way Microsoft bundles IE with Windows and used MSN (and then later Bing) as the default homepage for the browser. It was, and is, a clever tactic: it drove a certain built-in level of traffic to those services and gave IE some automatic market share. But even MSN and Bing are not total enclosures; they're way stations to other things. Facebook, though, wants to save you the step of having to go anywhere else. How nice of them.</p> <P> <img alt="Facebook Home - We use our phones everywhere" title="Facebook Home - We use our phones everywhere" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-April/facebook-home-in-bed.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">"We use our phones everywhere"</div> <P> <p>HTC isn't the only company that's signed up for Home as a partner. Sony and Samsung are also in, although whether they'll be offering phones similar to HTC's product isn't clear; I suspect it's about their phones being able to run Home without undue difficulty (and not, say, have Android updates break it). Another version for tablets is also under development for release later this year, with what I suspect will be an immersivity all of its own.</p> <P> <p>And while ads are not present in Home yet, Zuckerberg &amp; Co. made no bones about eventually including them. I suspect their strategy is to get the phones out to the general public first, harvest some behavioral telemetry for several months, then crunch those numbers and figure out where would be the best place to put the ads other than in a cluttered right-hand column that nobody looks at anyway. They are nothing if not clever.</p> <P> <p>The fact that Facebook is ad-driven is not what's disturbing about it. Many other sites use ads to monetize their content. It is that they invert the relationship between advertiser and consumer. You're not the user of Facebook; you're one of its products, and they go to some length to conceal the implications of this from you. Home is just the newest wrinkle in how they plan to accomplish this. And the terrible thing about it is that it might actually work exactly as intended.</p>2013-03-21T09:00:00ZAT&T&#8217;s New Data Plans DissectedBefore you balk at paying $300 a month, here are the reasons why there has to be some segmentation of usage. http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/wireless/atts-new-data-plans-dissected/240151351?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Ever get the feeling you'd been cheated? Well, sometimes it helps to check your feelings.</p> <P> <p>In an article entitled "<a href="http://AT&amp;T rolls out monstrous 30GB, 40GB, and 50GB shared data tiers starting at $300 monthly">AT&amp;T rolls out monstrous 30GB, 40GB, and 50GB shared data tiers starting at $300 monthly</a>," The Verge described several new shared data plans that start at $300/month (with unlimited talk and text included on all tiers). That's right: $300 a month.</p> <P> <p>A good thing these aren't <em>consumer </em>plans. They're for small businesses.</p> <P> <p>AT&amp;T's own <a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=23918&amp;cdvn=news&amp;newsarticleid=36172&amp;mapcode=consumer%7Cmk-small-business-basic">press release</a> on the subject begins with the words "AT&amp;T is helping businesses 'raise the productivity bar' with expanded choices of shared data plans." (Their <a href="http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=IDT1RDPo9AZ">consumer-grade plans</a> start at 1GB for $40 and go up to 20GB for $200.)</p> <P> <p>Other folks have picked up on the story -- e.g., the broadband-watchdog site <a href="http://stopthecap.com/2013/03/19/att-savings-30gb-wireless-data-old-price-30-new-price-300-a-900-increase/">Stop the Cap</a>, which claimed that moves like this would be a major disservice to rural customers. "A family watching Netflix consuming 45GB of usage on AT&amp;T's DSL service pay as little as $15 a month for broadband," wrote Stop The Cap's Philip Dampier.</p> <P> <P>"With AT&amp;T's wireless Internet service, that same family will spend a prohibitive $500 a month." (They <a href="http://stopthecap.com/2012/10/25/at-customers-will-pay-more/">wrote before</a>, critically, about how they claim AT&amp;T's solution to broadband access for people in rural areas is ostensibly going to be wireless.)</p> <P> <p>The problem of high-speed internet access for people in underdeveloped areas isn't a trivial one. But it doesn't help anyone to conflate too many issues.</p> <P> <p>First: <em>Business and consumer plans exist separately for a reason.</em></p> <P> <p>Granted, consumer demand for mobile data is going nowhere but up. What was a "business-grade" plan five years ago is well within the realm of what a "consumer-grade" plan is now. But that also needs to be tempered with realism: if you only have or can afford 2GB of mobile data, it makes sense to confine your high-consumption behavior to home Wi-Fi connections or hotspots. Businesses want and need constant, uninterrupted service. Consumers want that too, but it's going to be hard to convince providers to give it to them at less cost without giving up <em>something.</em></p> <P> <p>That said, AT&amp;T also provides tools for managing data use on the plan, such as alerts when certain usage thresholds are met (65 percent, 90 percent and 100 percent). That way, at least if you wind up making short work of your monthly allotment, you'll know about it.</p> <P> <p>What about the possibility of offering exclusive bandwidth deals for certain high-traffic providers -- for instance, paying another $5 a month to allow your AT&amp;T consumer wireless account to stream all traffic from Netflix without a cap? There's a part of me that balks at the idea: It sounds too much like preferential treatment (shilling for "net non-neutrality") for my taste. But it might be one of the few other ways to deal with the problem that consumers might actually spring for, barring buying a full-blown business plan or an "unlimited" data plan.</p> <P> <p>Second: <em>"Unlimited" data never will be, and never was to begin with.</em></p> <P> <p>Many of the folks who read announcements like this usually take a moment to lament the death of the unlimited mobile data plan. I was one of those people myself, until I realized what <em>we</em> call an unlimited plan isn't what, say, T-Mobile calls unlimited. "Unlimited" <em>anything</em> plans never are -- they're just plans designed to encompass everything but the 99th percentile of usage. The limits do exist, but are typically set high enough that most people never blunder into them -- and when they do, the usual response is to throttle the connection temporarily.</p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-March/ATT-Mobile-Data-Share-Estimator.jpg"><img alt="AT&T's Mobile Data Share cost estimator" title="AT&T's Mobile Data Share cost estimator" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-March/ATT-Mobile-Data-Share-Estimator-452.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0;padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic;text-align:right;">AT&T's Mobile Data Share cost estimator. Click image for a larger version.</div></p> <P> <p>I ran into a variation of this with my Web hosting company, where I keep a blog on an account that has "unlimited" bandwidth and storage. (I use about 2.2 GB of bandwidth a month and about 2.6 GB of disk space.) The other month I got a notice from them that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inode">inode</a> usage on my account, set to a soft limit of 300,000 for any given account on my tier, was tipping the scale at <em>456,078 </em>inodes. Turned out a mail account on my system somewhere had become a target for spammers, and some ungodly number of spam messages were accumulating in a folder I never poked my nose in. I cleaned out the folder and deleted the account for good measure (it wasn't like I was using it, anyway), and the warnings went away.</p> <P> <p>But the whole experience reinforced something I'd suspected all along: what is called and sold as "unlimited" never is, and in a practical sense simply can't be. A better way to advertise this sort of thing would be "<em>soft-limit</em>" -- you don't hit a wall, but it's more like you start slogging through molasses.</p> <P> <p>Now, given a choice between hard limits and soft limits, I'll take the latter. It's nice to not have a door slammed in your face (or on your foot). But soft limits are still limits, and the throttling that takes place in such circumstances makes them that much less useful for video-on-the-go or other latency- and bandwidth-sensitive things.</p> <P> <p>There's also evidence that unlimited usage plans may not really make that much of a difference in terms of consumer habits anyway. Last year, Validas (a wireless analytics company) crunched some numbers and <a href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/mythbuster-why-unlimited-data-throttling-may-be-pointless/">found</a> that the differences in usage patterns between limited and unlimited plans were not that profound -- that the "unlimited" users were using, <em>at most</em>, about 25 percent more data than their tiered counterparts. This same study has also been cast as <a href="http://bgr.com/2012/02/23/throttling-unlimited-data-plans-is-pointless-study-finds/">an argument against throttling</a>: If there's no real difference, why impose a cap in the first place? My take is that it makes the overall costs of the system manageable for everyone. Without some form of segmentation of usage, it becomes unwieldy in the long run to give everyone a one-size-fits-all deal.</p> <P> <p>I don't think tiered plans and segmentation are going away, especially not on the business side of things. They provide a convenient way for a company (or a family) to aggregate the cost of their bandwidth into one bill. But I also don't think pressure to keep unlimited plans in some form is going to vanish, either -- even if what is offered through them is entirely symbolic.</p>2013-03-20T08:00:00ZSamsung Galaxy S4 - Peak Smartphone?Most of the really inventive things we do with our devices come from the software that's added.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/wireless/samsung-galaxy-s4-peak-smartphone/240151179?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Meet the new phone, same as the old phone.</p> <P> <p>If it sounds like heresy for me to say that in the wake of the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-claims-best-phone-ever-made/240148856">HTC One</a> and the Samsung Galaxy S4, the closer I look at what's supposedly so special about the newest generation of phones, the more I see things that aren't <em>phone</em> features at all.</p> <P> <p>At both the HTC One and Galaxy S4 events, the manufacturers for each phone took to the stage and pounded their chests about the great photo-taking and organization features sported by the phone. <P> "But that's all software," I told myself. "That's not the phone <em>per se</em>."</p> <P> <p>And so it went with just about every other major feature announced with the S4. That snazzy machine-translation system so you can find a restroom in K&ouml;ln or a subway stop in Tokyo? Software. The exercise and diet management tools? Software, with a generous dose of add-on hardware that in theory could work with any phone.</p> <P> <p>Phones have started to peak in more ways than one. The number of things we can effectively cram into them may continue to inch up each year (look, the S4 has a <em>temperature and humidity sensor!</em>), but the amount of actual innovation that comes from such feature-cramming is minimal, and battery life &mdash; every phone's Achilles heel &mdash; remains stagnant.</p> <P> <p>Besides, most of the really inventive things we do with phones don't come from those gizmos anyway. They come from software added either by the phone markers or by the users &mdash; or by the value provided through network-based services. I'm not even touching on the larger question of whether those features are real value-adds or just toys.</p> <P> <p>When the most loudly-touted new features of a phone are all software, there isn't a thing in the world &mdash; short of maybe a patent lawsuit &mdash; stopping a given software-based feature from appearing in most any phone that has the hardware to make it happen. And given how the hardware bar for phones has been raised so much in recent years (quad-core processors, 1080p playback, you name it), there's very little a recent-model smartphone <em>can't</em> do with the right software.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-March/samsung-galaxy-4S.jpg" /> <P> <p>Samsung knows this full well. When PC Magazine's Sascha Segan <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2416620,00.asp">talked</a> to Nick DiCarlo, Samsung's VP of portfolio planning, he admitted as much: "Anything that we can do that's not dependent on hardware like infrared, we'll definitely bring to all the flagship devices." The real problem as I see it is, again, not the further fragmentation of Android (as Segan hinted at, and was quickly rebuffed for doing so), but whether this means phone hardware has become a game of diminishing returns.</p> <P> <p>And all signs show it has. There's only so large you can make a screen before the device it's mounted in becomes unwieldy, so you turn to cramming more pixels into the display &mdash; which, in turn, has practical limits as well. (Would we really <em>need </em>2560 pixels across on a five-inch display?) You can only cram in so many cores before battery life begins to tank, even with all the optimizations that can be thrown at them. There's only so many sensors that can be included before the data they harvest becomes redundant, spurious or a privacy concern.</p> <P> <p>Eventually, it stops becoming about the <em>device</em> and more about the <em>usage</em> &mdash; something empowered most directly through software and connectivity, not hardware.</p> <P> <p>I suspect this is a big part of why Apple resists packing current- and bleeding-edge stuff into the iPhone. It knows that the broadly consumer-oriented user base it caters to cares less about what's <em>new</em> than what <em>works</em>, and its job is to make it all work as seamlessly as possible. Hence, I suspect, there will be no fingerprint reader for the iPhone 5S: There's no existing broad-deployment consumer use case for it, and thus, nothing to polish. Your average, relatively tech-indifferent iPhone user is not exactly out there raising a stink about the lack of a fingerprint reader. He's more likely to be raising a stink about lousy battery life.</p> <P> <p>Further proof of how most of what makes a phone is its software stack was supplied by a friend of mine, a Galaxy S3 user whom I met with after the Samsung demo. He'd recently rooted his S3 and replaced the stock ROM with <a href="http://www.cyanogenmod.org/">CyanogenMod</a> 10, and had nothing but good things to report about the experience. Not only did he get a more responsive UI and better battery life, he even got a better and more consistent phone signal &mdash; he's now able to talk on the phone while riding the eight floors up in the elevator to his apartment. The stock S3 ROM couldn't even <em>find</em> a signal there. But most people aren't in the habit of rooting their phones, and so they will gamely turn to the next iteration of the Galaxy for the things they think they can only get with a hardware upgrade.</p> <P> <p>I shouldn't make it sound like there's no reason at all to rev the S3. Few people are going to complain about each successive generation of smartphones being that much more superbly engineered, that much skinnier and lighter and more durable. I know I was eyeing, say, the HTC One's aluminum chassis and thinking something like that would be a great fit for a butterfingered spaz like me.</p> <P> <p>But the allegedly oh-so-cutting-edge Blink Feed home screen app &mdash; that's software. Same with the vast majority of the goodies I saw in the S4. Software. Anyone can do those things.</p> <P> <p>And by the time I'd walked out of Radio City Music Hall &mdash; where, oh irony, HTC publicists had been leafleting the line outside &mdash; I suspected someone else is already doing feature copying in software.</p>2013-03-16T09:06:00ZSamsung Galaxy S 4: Visual TourSamsung's new Galaxy S 4 smartphone offers unique features to challenge Apple's iPhone. Take a closer look.http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/samsung-galaxy-s-4-visual-tour/240150928?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundthewebWith the Galaxy SIII (or S 3) firmly established as one of the top-selling smartphones of recent years, Samsung clearly believed its successor, the long-heralded Galaxy S 4, deserved a major release event. It got one, all right: a lavish song-and-dance premiere at none other than New York City's Radio City Music Hall, with thousands in attendance. <P> When the curtain rose on the main stage to begin the release announcement, all that was missing was the Rockettes. Broadway actor Will Chase served as master of ceremonies to introduce JK Shin, president and head of the IT and mobile communication division of Samsung Electronics, and Ryan Biden, director of product marketing for Samsung Telecommunications America. <P> Via a series of cutesy on-stage skits, Chase and a troupe of actors -- including the remarkably talented tap-dancing kid who was featured in Samsung's "Unpacked" ad campaign -- took the audience through a rapid-fire tour of the S 4's new features. <P> The key point they stressed was that the feature set for the S 4 is designed to complement the behavior of our daily lives: gallery functions for picture-taking, live language translations for travelers, integration with Samsung's HomeSync devices for integration with TVs and media hubs. <P> Business-class users haven't been snubbed, though: Samsung's "Knox" technology allows segregation of the phone into separate, protected work and personal facets. <P> The phone's processor varies -- it's either a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 or Samsung Exynos 5 processor, with different models shipped to different territories. The phone will come with 2 GB of RAM and 16, 32 or 64 GB of internal flash storage, which is further complemented by a microSD card slot that can store up to an additional 64 GB. <P> Connectivity will include both 3G and 4G radios, with up to Hexa band support for 4G, Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac support, Bluetooth 4.0, and even an infrared LED to allow the phone to be used as a controller for home theater and TV devices with the appropriate software. The phone offers two polycarbonate shell designs: Black Mist or White Frost. <P> The 13-megapixel rear-facing camera and 2-megapixel front-facing camera can work together in both Samsung's photo and video chat applications -- for instance, to allow you (using the front camera) and other friends (using the rear camera) to chat with a remote third party using a picture-in-picture view. <P> The S4 is set to premiere in some 155 countries at the end of April. Pricing has not yet been announced. Dig into our slideshow to look at some key features and decide if this might be the smartphone for you.The Galaxy S 4's 5-inch AMOLED screen fits in a package that shares the same dimensions as the S 3 (except for thickness -- it's now 7.9mm to the S 3's 8.6mm). <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a>Many touch functions -- such as swiping, scrolling and answering calls -- can be accomplished by simply passing a hand or a finger near the surface of the display without actually touching it. This "Air Gesture" functionality, as Samsung calls it, can be enabled and disabled separately from other touch and gesture functions. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>The multimedia dock and game controller shown here (sold separately) help expand on the S 4's functionality. Native integration with Samsung's HomeSync TV and media-hub devices is included. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>When the S 4 is inside its case and the folding cover is closed, the time and date display can be seen through the window in the front of the cover. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>When the S 4's cover is open, a pop-out side tab from the home screen lets you launch many frequently used applications. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>The S Translator app can translate spoken or written phrases between a number of different languages, including English, French, German, Chinese, Japanese and Korean. A data connection is required for the translation function to work effectively, but a collection of common preset phrases can also be used when no data connection is available. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a>The S 4 can play video on a high-definition television set. The content being played back is 1080p. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P> <P>Reluctant to part with your existing phone because you don't know how to move your existing settings and data to a new phone? Samsung's Smart Switch app for the PC can do the heavy lifting for you. Samsung claims it will port crucial data from most every major brand of smartphone, including the iPhone. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>Many other new functions available in the S4 can be toggled individually. Smart Scroll and Smart Pause use eye-tracking functions to automatically scroll content or pause playback of video (for instance, when you look away from the screen). <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>A full line of accessories is available for the S 4, including a folding cover and lifestyle and health-related add-ons such as a pulse, temperature and blood pressure sensor called the S Band. <P> <strong>Recommended Reading</strong> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/android-chief-andy-rubin-steps-aside/240150731">Android Chief Andy Rubin Steps Aside</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/blackberry-boasts-order-for-1-million-sm/240150785">BlackBerry Boasts Order For 1 Million Smartphones</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-maps-slowly-improving/240150724">Apple Maps Slowly Improving</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/security/malware-writers-prefer-android/240150256">Malware Writers Prefer Android</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/development/mobility/android-to-dominate-2013-mobile-app-down/240150006">Android To Dominate 2013 Mobile App Downloads</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/handheld/10-great-android-apps-for-tablets/240149053">10 Great Android Apps For Tablets</a> <P> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/10-best-android-apps-of-2012/240144458"> 10 Best Android Apps Of 2012</a> <P>2013-03-07T13:55:00ZDropbox Alternative OwnCloud Uses Your Own StorageownCloud is a powerful and useful alternative to Dropbox or other file-hosting services. Future revisions of this open source project promise to be even better.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/dropbox-alternative-owncloud-uses-your-o/240150247?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>If you're leery of trusting your data to a third-party cloud-storage service, and have a web server of your own that you'd rather use, <a href="http://www.owncloud.org">ownCloud</a> may be the answer. It's free software that installs on most web servers and transforms it into your own private Dropbox clone.</p> <P> <p>ownCloud, now in version 4.5.7 and with a 5.0 beta available for public testing, is close enough to what I need for my own cloud-storage file-hosting needs that I might well ditch Dropbox entirely once ownCloud 5.0 is live. The company isn't saying when the new version will be available. The current version does have some feature limitations and requires some technical skill to get set up, but it's already an extremely impressive product. </p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-March/owncloud-01-620.jpg" /> <P> <p>Getting ownCloud set up on your web hosting can be done either by unpacking the entire application into a directory manually, or setting up an installer stub -- a single .PHP file -- which pulls the rest of the application's files down from ownCloud's servers. An SSL certificate is not required, but is a good idea. I had trouble getting the installer stub to work, possibly because of my web host's PHP configuration, but unpacking the app by hand into a directory on my web server worked fine. </p> <P> <p>Once you have the files installed, the rest of setup is almost entirely automatic. ownCloud can use an included SQLite database for simple installations (a website for a single user), or can connect to an instance of MySQL or PostgreSQL for larger, more advanced setups (a corporate file repository). Multiple user accounts and user groups can be created with different privilege levels and usage quotas. Uploading files to an ownCloud instance can be done by dragging and dropping files into the web-based file manager, or by synchronizing from a local folder with the desktop client. </p> <P> <p>ownCloud uses a host of add-ons (called "apps"), both supplied by the creators and by third parties, to enhance its functionality. The 4.5 branch comes with a slew of apps pre-installed--a music player, a calendar system and contact manager (which can be used to organize events and contacts between ownCloud users), and a picture gallery. There's even a simple built-in text editor. One of the most useful add-ons in 4.5 enables server-side file encryption -- something people hosting their ownCloud instance on a web service will like -- and while it works decently well right now it's being deprecated and replaced with a completely rewritten implementation in version 5. </p> <P> <p>The free desktop client for ownCloud works much like Dropbox's: you designate a local folder that is then synched to and from a given ownCloud installation. If you want Android and iOS clients, those are also available -- for $1 each. The shell integration for ownCloud's desktop client isn't quite as slick as Dropbox's--it doesn't have, for instance, icons in Explorer to show if a given file has synced yet with the remote server--but it works very well, and I got it running in two separate systems without issues. </p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-March/owncloud-03-620.jpg" /> <P> <p>Many of my complaints with ownCloud are mostly little issues with the user interface. It would be nice, for instance, if the included image gallery plugin had some easy way to jump to the actual folder holding an image. The search function is primitive; results come up as you type, but you can't do anything with a search result except view it or download it. That said, none of these things are conceptual flaws in the software; they're presentation-layer things that can easily be addressed in future revisions. </p> <P> <p>Name: <a href="http://www.owncloud.org">ownCloud</a><br /> <P> Price: Free<blockquote><i>Already a powerful and useful alternative to Dropbox or other file-hosting services; future revisions of this open source project promise to be even better.</i></blockquote> <P> Pros:<ul><li>Costs nothing, requires only a webhost that runs PHP</li> <P> <li>Highly configurable with first- and third-party add-ons</li> <P> <li>Server-side encryption included</li></ul> <P> Cons:<ul><li>Requires some heavy lifting to set up</li> <P> <li>The 5.0 version looks like it's most worth waiting for, but it isn't out yet</li></ul></p>2013-02-19T14:53:00ZHTC Claims "Best Phone Ever Made"HTC aims high with their claims for their revamped Android smartphone. Like previous HTC phones this one is aimed at consumers with a focus on media consumption and other lifestyle features, like TV remote control. A shame it lacks microSD storage expansion.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-claims-best-phone-ever-made/240148856?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>"This is the best phone ever made," claimed U.S. president of HTC, Mike Woodward, in a presentation today in Manhattan to announce <a target="_blank" href="http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-one/">the redesigned and revamped Android-based HTC One</a>.</p> <P> <p>Bold claims like this are nothing new for HTC; last year they <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-droid-dna-boast-most-advanced-smart/240124924">rolled out the Droid DNA</a> with the tag of "most advanced smartphone." Unlike Samsung, they're first and foremost a lifestyle-phone company; but like the Korean giant, they have been willing to explore both Windows Phone and Android offerings and see what fruit each bears in the market. The new Android-powered HTC One is all the more clearly a consumer / lifestyle product, something reflected from the outside in.</p> <P> <p><div style="margin:0; padding: 0 0 5px 5px; width:200px; float:right; text-align:center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2013-Feb/HTC-One-3.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2013-Feb/HTC-One-3-180.jpg" alt="New HTC One" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#990000; font-weight:bold;">The new HTC One (click for larger image)</div></div>First, the outside. The new HTC One uses an aluminum unibody design, one with the antenna directly integrated into the metal, which reduces the number of seams and gaps across the body of the phone. The Gorilla Glass front wraps around the edges and protects a 4.7", full 1080p display (measuring 468 ppi). It all makes for a pleasant feel in the hands, both light and solid, without the oddly rubbery feel of the previous HTC phones.</p> <P> <p>The guts of the HTC One are also impressive: a Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 quad-core processor running at 1.7 GHz, with an embedded 2300 mAh battery, 2 GB of RAM and either 32 or 64 GB of internal storage, but no microSD for storage expansion. NFC, Bluetooth 4.0, DLNA wireless streaming support, a micro-USB 2.0 port capable of making HDMI connections and 802.11 a/ac/b/g/n Wi-Fi are all included.</p> <P> <p>Lifestyle features in a phone usually come down to included apps or skins. In the HTC One's case, it's reworked home screen, something HTC claims has been done to reflect the way people "snack on information" in a Twitter- and Facebook-driven media world. Called BlinkFeed, this home screen presents the user with a continuous stream of information from social network and websites that are relevant to you. The look of BlinkFeed is reminiscent of the Windows Phone 8 "tiles" system, or perhaps the Modern UI News app that ships with Windows 8. HTC hasn't waited for people to come to them to provide content for BlinkFeed. Among the 1400 providers lined up to give Blink Feed something to do is ESPN.</p> <P> <p>The introduction of Beats Audio in the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-rezound-multimedia-to-go/231902314">HTC Rezound</a> still seems like a gimmick, but this year HTC added some other audio-related features that seem more genuinely useful: dual front-facing speakers, for instance. Multiple microphones in the unit are alleged to optimize call quality by sampling ambient sound and adjusting the call's frequency response and volume to match. HTC calls this "HDR recording", and further claims that the HTC One can make clear-sounding recordings even in noisy environments (e.g., concerts).</p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2013-Feb/HTC-One-2.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2013-Feb/HTC-One-2-452.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Click for larger image</div></p> <P> <p>The camera, too, has been reworked, and under the banner of yet another bold declaration: "The age of megapixels is over." To wit: the fact sheet for the HTC One doesn't even list a megapixel count for the phone's camera. Instead, HTC talked about how they use a custom "Ultrapixel" sensor with larger pixels to gather more light through its f2.0/28mm lens. The end result is, so they say, better performance for both HDR still photos and full HD video. Another video-related addition to the camera, "Zoe", is an app that automatically generates edited movies from raw footage. It's reminiscent of features in desktop programs like <a href="http://www.cyberlink.com/PowerDirector">Cyberlink PowerDirector</a>: interesting, but only groundbreaking in that it's being offered in the phone itself instead of as an external program.</p> <P> <p>If the smartphone did away with the standalone GPS, HTC has plans to make it do away with your TV's remote as well. HTC One's "Sense TV" feature allows the phone to work as an infrared remote for set-top boxes and TV sets, letting you jump to programs on the TV via an on-phone cannel guide app. I'll be exceptionally happy if it also allows us to shut off noisy TVs in bars.</p> <P> <p>HTC plans to ship the One in March, for 80 countries via 185 mobile operators. AT&amp;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Best Buy are to offer the phone in the U.S.; Rogers, Bell and Telus in Canada. No pricing has been set yet, so we'll have to wait to see how much cash has to be dropped to have the best phone ever made -- that is, so far.</p>2013-02-19T09:30:00ZiPad Mini Keyboard Cover Makes A Better TabletThe Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Mini is an excellent addition to any iPad Mini, which provides not only a proper typing surface but a stand and a protective cover.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/ipad-mini-keyboard-cover-makes-a-better/240148774?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/ultrathin-keyboard-mini?wt.mc_id=global_news_ultrathinmini">Logitech's Ultrathin Keyboard Mini</a> adds both a keyboard and a protective front to the newest member of the iPad lineup. The only thing that keeps it from converting my iPad Mini into a full-blown notebook is the limitations of the iPad itself (or, rather, iOS). </p> <P> <p>The Ultrathin Keyboard is aptly named. It's no thicker than the iPad Mini itself, so it doesn't add a great deal of bulk or extra weight to the Mini. It <i>might</i> make the Mini a little more difficult to insert into a close-fitting protective sleeve, for instance, but I haven't confirmed this. The back of the Ultrathin sports the same texturing and smoothness as the back of the Mini itself, so it maintains a consistency of design and feel when closed up. </p> <P> <p><div style="margin:0; padding: 0 0 5px 5px; width:185px; float:right; text-align:center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Feb/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini-2-1000.JPG"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Feb/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini-2-200.JPG" alt="same as caption" hspace="0" vspace="0" border="0" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#BB6600; font-size: small;font-weight:bold;">The iPad mini rests at an angle in the Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Mini (Click for larger image)</div></div>As with other covers for the Mini, the Ultrathin attaches to the Mini via a magnetic clasp and hinge. Close the keyboard over the face of the iPad, and it goes to sleep. The keyboard itself sleeps when not in use, although it has a dedicated power switch as well. </p> <P> <p>The hinge doesn't park at an angle the way a laptop's hinge does, so you can't prop the Mini on your lap with this keyboard. At least not when you have the Mini attached to the keyboard via the hinge: there's a magnetized slot directly in front of the keyboard you can park the Mini in. Too bad the viewing angle isn't adjustable there, though. It works well on a desktop, but not so well in one's lap or balanced on the knees. </p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote>BYTE also reviewed the Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover for the full-size iPad. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/logitech-ultrathin-keyboard-cover-is-a-t/240001387">Click here to read that review.</a></b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <p>If you're coming to the Mini from a full-blown desktop or notebook, obviously the size of the keys on the Ultrathin are going to take some getting used to. Large fingers need not apply, but despite that, the feel of typing on the Ultrathin is very comfortable. Logitech makes great keyboards &#151; the solar-powered K750, upon which I am typing this right now, is easily the best keyboard I've ever used &#151; and the Ultrathin is no exception. </p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Feb/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini/Logtech-Ultrathin-Keyboard-Mini-5-620.JPG" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#BB6600; font-size:small; font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Mini is an excellent keyboard, but necessarily a bit cramped.</div> <P> <p>The Ultrathin isn't just a laptop keyboard shrunk to iPad Mini specifications, but has also been outfitted with iPad-specific controls. The square-icon button at the top left of the keyboard provides the same functions as the iPad Mini's own Home button: tap it once to bring you to the home screen, double tap it to open the app switcher, and long-press it to bring up Siri. Function keys let you access everything from the on-screen keyboard (should you need it) to the multimedia playback controls. I especially liked the way the Fn+arrow key combos let you select text onscreen. </p> <P> <p>What the Ultrathin can't provide you with is emulation of the kinds of behaviors on the iPad Mini that you might be used to from the desktop. E.g., the cursor keys only work when there's an actual cursor already placed onscreen via a touch action. If you're already used to the way </p> <P> <p>One annoying if ultimately minor design gripe: the Ultrathin doesn't use the same power connector as the iPad Mini itself. This would have been handy, since you could alternately charge the Mini and the keyboard from the same plug, without needing a second cable or adapter. That said, the Ultrathin uses a standard micro-USB plug, so if you already have one in your arsenal of cabling it should work as-is. </p> <P> <p>Name: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/product/ultrathin-keyboard-mini?crid=1221&WT.mc_id=global_news_ultrathinmini">Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Mini</a> <p>Price: $79.99 <blockquote><i>An excellent addition to any iPad Mini, which provides not only a proper typing surface but a stand and a protective cover.</i></blockquote> Pros: <ul><li>Thin and light</li> <li>Great keyboard action despite its small size</li> <li>Has iPad-specific key actions</li></ul> Cons: <ul><li>Doesn't use the same power connector as the iPad Mini itself</li></ul></p> <P> <iframe width="620" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KsqsORSx23U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>2013-02-04T12:57:00ZFCC Spectrum Plan is Telco Carrier NightmareAT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint are no doubt concerned about the FCC's plan to open up high-quality RF spectrum for free Internet access, but they shouldn't be too worried. Too many factors weigh against such spectrum resulting in actual free Internet access for the public.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/wireless/fcc-spectrum-plan-is-telco-carrier-night/240147785?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>News that the FCC has been <a target="_blank" href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0109/DOC-318326A1.pdf">proposing</a> to set aside spectrum for municipal broadband Internet access has a lot of people piping up, both pro and con. It's a brave idea, and quite possibly a doomed one.</p> <P> <p>First off, this isn't exactly news. It's the newest incarnation of the "white space broadband" proposal the FCC floated back in 2011, where the spectrum freed up by the switch to digital over-the-air TV broadcasting could be used for everything from municipal Wi-Fi to as-yet-uninvented networking technologies.</p> <P> <p>The ultimate nightmare scenario for the telcos isn't hard to envision. The FCC reserves that spectrum for the development of an entirely new wireless technology, with the power and speed of Wi-Fi and the mobility of 4G LTE, and which is reserved for municipal use. But the odds of that ever happening, in whole or part, are terribly slender. Here's why.</p> <P> <p>The first and most obvious challenge: the existing for-pay providers of wireless broadband. Well, of course: the idea that a taxpayer-funded service could come along and undercut what they have to sell to people -- even if not in every market they currently service -- scares the daylights out of them. AT&amp;T has been one of its biggest enemies, especially since it's <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/carrier-deals-fragment-lte-spectru m/240147090">sinking tons of money</a> into upgrading its own wireless bandwidth allocations, and wouldn't want to have that money go to waste.</p> <P> <p>The second challenge is the technology to be used. The FCC plans to use some 195 MHz of spectrum in the 5 GHz band (802.11n), which is already in use. The FCC notes that "because the 5 gigahertz band is already used for other purposes by both federal and non-federal users, the effort will require significant collaboration with other federal agencies". But they're not the only ones: the auto industry is also concerned the use of said spectrum might infringe on the signal space for a vehicle-to-vehicle warning system that's currently being developed. The National Association of Broadcasters also <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/491516-NAB_Current_FCC_Band_P lan_Needs_Fixing.php">has it own concerns</a>.</p> <P> <p>The third challenge is the time and effort involved to actually build the network. The whitespace proposal has been on the table for years, with the only antennas actually erected to make use of it so far being a <a href="http://www.wirelessinnovationalliance.org/index.cfm?objectid=8D7146E0- 4845-11E1-B23A000C296BA163">pilot program</a> in Wilmington, North Carolina. And that was only because they were one of the first cities to make the transition from analog to digital TV, thus freeing up the needed spectrum. (There's also the question of whether or not the current generation of client devices could handle such a network. I suspect the answer will have to be "yes", to speed adoption.)</p> <P> <p>There's yet another reason reserving that bandwidth for public use is problematic: selling it off would generate sizeable revenue for the government. The <em>Columbus Dispatch</em> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2013/01/28/fcc-might- favor-spectrum-for-wi-fi-over-wireless-firms.html">claims</a> the auction of this bandwidth could generate some $15 billion, although some companies (e.g., AT&amp;T) could also be barred from bidding or could only acquire certain amounts of bandwidth. Companies like Google and Microsoft have been lobbying hard to keep the spectrum public; AT&amp;T and other telecoms have been pushing lawmakers to allow the spectrum to be sold.</p> <P> <p>Both sides can make strong cases for why their approach is best. The telcos could argue that having such frequency in private hands would allow it to be developed far more thoroughly and quickly than if it were a public resource. The Googles and Microsofts could make a case that putting that spectrum into private hands only means that many more ways for your broadband bills to be jacked up.</p> <P> <p>Thing is, if it does take years and billions of public dollars to create such a network, that might actually undercut one of the telcos' competition arguments. Municipal broadband would be too limited (and perhaps also slow) to really pose a threat to the likes of AT&amp;T, since anyone who really needed quality broadband wireless would be more than willing to pay for it.</p> <P> <p>I would love to see municipal wireless broadband available with the same ubiquity as water and electricity. The last century saw us bring the latter to just about the whole of the country. Network access has become as valuable to the average citizen as electricity itself, so it's high time we took the idea of municipal Internet seriously. But we can't kid ourselves into thinking it'll be fast or easy.</p> <P> <p>Then again, if it was, it might not have been worth it.</p>2013-01-28T09:30:00ZCarrier Deals Fragment LTE SpectrumAT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint and other carriers use different ranges in the RF spectrum for LTE services. The recent deal between AT&T and Verizon illustrates the fragmentation of the LTE spectrum and the problems it creates for smooth operation of handsets.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/carrier-deals-fragment-lte-spectrum/240147090?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>What with all the recent news of telecom buyouts and mergers, here's one I never thought I'd see: AT&T just <a href="http://www.lightreading.com/at-t/att-strikes-19b-spectrum-deal-with-verizon/240147012">struck a deal</a> for $1.9 billion worth of spectrum from Verizon.</p> <P> <p>The nitty-gritty of the deal involves Verizon selling several blocks of <a target="_blank" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=lower700">700 MHz spectrum</a> to both AT&T and Grain Management, a Florida private equity firm with many telecom investments. Verizon's been apparently trying to offload this portion of its spectrum, since the company has more suitable spectrum for its needs &#151; which it picked up in a swap deal with a number of cable providers in the U.S.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/lower-700MHz.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;"><a target="_blank" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=about&id=lower700">The lower 700 MHz spectrum band</a> was formerly allocated to television channels 52 to 59. Those broadcasters were required to move to digital broadcasting on other spectrum and the lower 700 was auctioned off by the FCC.</div> <P> <p>AT&T, on the other hand, plans to use this 700 MHz spectrum for its LTE buildouts, which the company is planning to extend to some 250 million U.S. customers <a href="http://www.lightreading.com/at-t/att-wants-to-cover-250m-with-4g-lte-in-2013/240146979">by the end of 2013</a>, up from the 174 million AT&T currently has. The 4G LTE expansion project is expected to cost them some <a href="http://www.lightreading.com/fourth-generation-4g-wireless/att-puts-up-14b-to-boost-broadband/240143372">$8 billion through 2015</a>. </p> <P> <p>Verizon is still in the lead as far as 4G LTE service goes, though, and plans to meet its target for 4G LTE buildout by the middle of this year. But AT&T is attempting to think a step ahead &#151; it's also looking to create another LTE network on the WCS (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/wireless-communications-service-wcs">Wireless Communications Services</a>) band. WCS uses the 2.3Ghz portion of the spectrum recently <a href="http://www.lightreading.com/fourth-generation-4g-wireless/fcc-chairman-says-yes-to-wcs-for-4g/240141801">approved by the FCC</a> for such use, and may be ready for commercial use sometime in 2015 or so. AT&T <a href="http://www.lightreading.com/fourth-generation-4g-wireless/could-sprint-be-next-to-sell-wcs-spectrum/240136146">filed to purchase spectrum</a> in that range from Comcast, Horizon Wi-Com and NextWave Wireless Inc. earlier this year.</p> <P> <p>One possible issue in the short term is the fragmentation of spectrum that AT&T might experience if using both 700 MHz blocks and space in the 2.3Ghz zone. Fragmented spectrum makes for a small but measurable increase in the cost of smartphones. One report created by the GSM Association's research division Wireless Intelligence predicted that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gsma.com/newsroom/gsma-wireless-intelligence-reports-that-global-rollout-of-lte-will-accelerate-to-2015-but-spectrum-fragmentation-must-be-addressed">some thirty-eight different, non-contiguous slices of spectrum would be in use for LTE by 2015</a>.</p> <P> <p>Some of this can be offset through advanced chip sets or <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/battery-life-boost-coming-from-new-anten/240145379">antenna technology</a>, but there's little doubt the best long-term strategy is for different carriers to have as many contiguous spectrum blocks as possible. Which, in turn, means that spectrum swaps and sales &#151; and all their attendant intra-carrier wheeling and dealing &#151; are guaranteed to become a major component of the way LTE networks are completed and built out over the next couple of years. </p> <P> <p>Out of all this, the biggest issue is for the industry is to create LTE standards that are globally compatible and don't require a lot of programming to ensure a given handset can find LTE spectrum wherever it goes or in whichever market it's deployed.</p>2013-01-23T08:05:00ZSamsung's New Weapon Against BlackBerry, iPhone: Fixmo?Samsung Ventures has bought a stake in Fixmo, which sells MRM, or mobile risk management solutions. Their SafeZone product creates a separate, secure area on iOS or Android devices for confidential data and apps, similar in some ways to Good Technology's solutions. It's especially well-suited to a BYOD environment, where the company can't completely control and trust the device. The move may reinforce Samsung's SAFE program for security standards in Android devices.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/samsungs-new-weapon-against-blackberry-i/240146796?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>You know Samsung: they're one of the world's biggest electronics companies, threatening to eclipse everyone from Sony to Apple. BlackBerry and Research In Motion, you also know: the latter is the creator of the former, and is struggling to turn its brand around in the face of severe competition by everyone from Apple to, well, Samsung.</p> <P> <p>But when <a target="_blank" href="http://www.samsungventures.com/">Samsung Ventures</a>, an investment group that bankrolls various efforts on behalf of the Korean electronics giant, bought a stake in Fixmo, the word on everyone's lips was: "Who?" </p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://fixmo.com/">Fixmo Inc.,</a> a Canadian security-software firm, creates and markets MRM, or mobile risk management solutions for companies. Their product <a target="_blank" href="http://fixmo.com/products/safezone">SafeZone</a>, for instance, lets an administrator create a protected, encrypted container on a user's device, inside which all of their business apps and communications are encapsulated. The rest of the device can function as it normally does, with all of their games, photos, and music. Both iOS and Android are supported. (RIM's current MDM solution, BlackBerry Mobile Fusion, supports iOS and Android devices as well.)</p> <P> <p><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/fixmo-safezone.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Fixmo SafeZone creates a secure container for data and applications, protecting them against insecure apps and content elsewhere on the device.</div></p> <P> <p>The SafeZone container is somewhat analogous to <a target="_blank" href="http://www1.good.com/products/good-for-enterprise">Good Technology's security solutions</a>. The idea is that even if the user is irresponsible and compromises the security and integrity of the rest of the phone, the container with all its sensitive assets is protected. It's especially well-suited to a BYOD environment, where the company can't completely control and trust the device.</p> <P> <p>Fixmo and RIM are connected by more than just shared business concerns. Tyler Lessard, former VP of BlackBerry Global Alliances and Developer Relations at RIM, left his position there at the end of September 2011 and went to work for Fixmo as their chief marketing officer.</p> <P> <p>This isn't the only reason Samsung's stake in Fixmo, as reported in a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-22/samsung-ventures-buys-fixmo-stake-to-take-on-blackberry.html">Bloomberg article</a>, has been interpreted as a pre-emptive strike at taking on RIM's business users. The Korean company has already done a fair amount of work to make its Android-powered, business-oriented phones and tablets secure and manageable via their <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/can-sam sung-make-enterprises-feel-safe/232901430">SAFE program</a>, their existing MDM spec. Samsung may be looking to Fixmo to help craft software solutions for the next generation of SAFE-spec devices, especially since Fixmo's track record in this area includes helping develop software for the National Security Agency to protect its own devices.</p> <P> <p>Samsung is currently the worldwide leader in smartphone and mobile-device sales, having racked up 28% of the entire market in 2012. (Apple, #2, has 20%.) RIM is projected to have its market share dwindle to 5% or less, with few people &#151; analysts, corporate admins, or consumers alike &#151; placing much stock yet in the company's plans to revamp its phones and their underlying operating system.</p> <P> <p>Apple, too, has been feeling a pinch, as their shares have dropped nearly 30 percent since September (down to $504 or so from its high of $750.07) and losing some $190 billion in market value for the company. Its sales have slowed due to both market saturation and the prevalence of high-quality and less-costly competitors &#151; namely, the newest phones built with Android 4.x.</p> <P> <p>If Samsung decides to bake Fixmo's solutions directly into its products, that would give them a useful edge in corporate deployments by strengthening the baseline security level of their devices. SAFE is an open standard, and many third-party MDM solutions directly support it, so the security profile of the whole Samsung ecosystem would benefit.</p> <P> <p>Samsung's hardware competition includes not just Apple or RIM, but other Android smartphone makers that have been touting security and manageability, such as Motorola Mobility, the unit of Motorola sold to Google earlier this year. The latter company's original push towards making major inroads into corporate mobile computing via the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/motorol a-droid-4-an-office-in-your-pocke/232600815">DROID 4</a> and its "<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/motorol a-aims-to-make-android-business-r/232600574">Business Ready</a>" phone lines (the latter using technology harvested from Motorola acquisition 3LM) have all but petered out. The latest <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/motorol as-new-droid-razr-makes-a-deeper/240006814">DROID RAZR</a> models are geared mainly at the non-corporate end user.</p> <P> <p>Samsung is far from the first company to provide Fixmo with investment capital. Fixmo received $6.5 million in Series B and $23 million in Series C funding in June and November of 2011, respectively. And Motorola Solutions Inc., an investment arm of Motorola that is not connected to the Motorola Mobility division, also had their venture capital division provide <a target="_blank" href="http://www.finsmes.com/2012/08/fixmo-receives-investment-motorola-solutions-venture-capital.html">investment funding</a> to Fixmo in August of last year, for "research &amp; development and global market expansion."</p> <P>2013-01-17T08:45:00ZSatellite GPS Works Off GridThe Delorme InReach is a combination GPS on steroids and satellite communications link for all those who go boldly where few others go, and want a way to track their movements and call for help if need be.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/geo-location/satellite-gps-works-off-grid/240146428?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>I hate to refer to anything as "X on steroids", but the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.inreachdelorme.com/">Delorme InReach</a> really does earn that description. </p> <P> <p>inReach is for when conventional phone GPS isn't enough. It's an industrial-strength GPS radio and two-way satellite communications system for people who go off the grid: hikers, explorers, and folks who work in or travel through remote or rural areas. You can send predetermined messages from your location via SMS, and even send an SOS message to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.geosalliance.com/sar/">GEOS Search and Rescue</a> in the event you're stranded somewhere remote. The rescue service is international, although it is only free in North America (U.S. and Canada). In other parts of the world, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.inreachdelorme.com/product-info/faq.php">according to Delorme</a>, "...rescue fees will depend on the local rules and regulations associated with wilderness rescue. You can buy rescue insurance through our partner GEOS." </p> <P> <p>The inReach itself is about the size of two packs of cigarettes, back-to-back, with a stubby antenna and a belt clip loop. Buttons on the face of the unit control power, mapping of movements, and sending of messages. The SOS button is protected by a slider: it's next to impossible to trigger it accidentally. Just as well, since sending a spurious rescue message to GEOS is not something to take lightly, for obvious reasons. You also need to set up not one but two emergency contacts for the system (e.g., a spouse and a relative), so that GEOS can contact someone if they must.</p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/delorme-inreach.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/delorme-inreach-620.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The Delorme InReach. Thank you Thing. Click for larger image.</div></p> <P> <p>Since I have little wilderness nearby to get lost in save maybe the Pine Barrens, I took the inReach for a trip across Long Island and into New York City. Rather than hang it off any of my gear and risk having it torn off, I tossed it into the top pocket of a backpack, which didn't interfere with the signal in any perceptible way. The SOS uses the satellite uplink, so even in an area with zero cell coverage you should still be able to get a rescue call out. That said, some line-of-sight with the sky is required for the satellite link to work, so folks like cave-divers may not be able to rely on it. </p> <P> <p>Pair the inReach with a smartphone via Bluetooth, and you can use the Earthmate mapping app (for <a target="_blank" href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.delorme.earthmate&amp;hl=en">Android</a> and <a target="_blank" href="https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/earthmate/id519247758?mt=8">iOS</a>) to see maps of your location. Maps can be cached locally, so they will continue to work even when you have no actual data connection on the phone. The data garnered from your movements can also be viewed on-line via your account's "Map" section. Automatic status updates can also be sent from your position minutes on a pre-set schedule. The intervals are 10 minutes, 30 minutes, or 1/2/4 hours.</p> <P> <p><a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/delorme-map.png"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2013-Jan/delorme-map-620.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Earthmate (Click for larger image)</div></p> <P> <p>Because I'm not fond of throwing batteries away, I tried out the inReach both with the provided AA lithium batteries and a set of NiMH rechargeables. The biggest problem with using rechargeables, something I've seen with other devices, is that the inReach may deliver a spurious "low battery" warning. </p> <P> <p>As with a cell phone, the inReach unit by itself requires a service plan to be useful. The most basic plan is $9.95 a month, with some limits on message rates. Higher-tier plans ($29.95 and $49.95) are also available, which raise the message-rate limits and add a few other features. </p> <P> <p>Name: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.inreachdelorme.com/">Delorme inReach</a><blockquote><i>A combination GPS and satellite communications link for all those who go boldly where few others go, and want a way to track their movements and call for help if need be.</i></blockquote> Price: $249 (Service plans run from $9.95 to $49.95 per month<br> Pros:<ul><li>Pairs with smartphones via Bluetooth to provide detailed mapping and tracking.</li><li>Can send and receive messages via SMS even when there's no cell coverage.</li></ul> Cons:<ul><li>Requires line-of-sight with the sky for best results.</li><li>Spurious errors with NiMH rechargeable batteries.</li><li>Service plan also required.</li></ul></p>2013-01-09T13:45:00Z2015: Apple Cachet Is Pass&eacute;It's CES in 2015: Apple's drive for market share has backfired and their brand has deteriorated as a result. They're still a big player and sell a lot of iPhones and iPads, but they're not a leader anymore.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/mobile-applications/2015-apple-cachet-is-pass/240145904?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p><i>[Reports yesterday say that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/microsofts-ballmer-shows-up-at-ces-after-all/2013/01/08/323e82b0-599c-11e2-9fa9-5fbdc9530eb9_story.html">Apple is proceeding with plans to launch a less-expensive iPhone</a>. What does this mean for the company? Where will they be in 2 years? This speculative column was written after CES 2015 to report on Apple.]</i></p> <P> <p>Now that CES 2015 is over, I'm starting to understand why Apple doesn't exhibit there in the first place. Here it is, the year of the iPhone 7m &#151; a phone that's not predicted to push the iPhone sales share back up over the 25% mark &#151; while everyone else in the known universe is doing far more interesting things with Android Mint Chocolate Chip and Windows Phone 10.</p> <P> <p>And we <em>still</em> don't know when, or if, iOS 7 is coming out.</p> <P> <p><b><hr /><blockquote>Dino Londis has a different vision of Apple in 2015. Click here to read about how <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/mobile-applications/2015-apple-becomes-app/240145903">Apple lets hardware decline to shift focus to services</a>.</b></blockquote><hr /></p> <P> <p>A while back, people speculated that Apple ran the risk of becoming boring. From everything I see, something far worse has happened: Apple has become <em>bored</em>.</p> <P> <p>It isn't difficult to get that way when you're top dog, and when you've grown used to people fighting tooth and nail to get into your ecosystem. But a funny thing happened to mobile in the last couple of years. People stopped caring about ecosystems.</p> <P> <p>Ecosystems are portals, and when one portal becomes as good as another &#151; or better, and certainly cheaper &#151; you can expect people to switch. When most every service you use has an iOS or Android (and often also a Windows Phone or Blackberry) app &#151; and when those services are little more than fancy HTML 5 driven doorways, meaning they're not confined to any of <em>those</em> devices, either &#151; there's little point in being brand-loyal unless you actually <em>like</em> the feel of a lighter wallet.</p> <P> <p>Which explains experiments like the M-series iPhone. It was clearly designed to keep Apple from losing customers to Android: a $329 iPhone that attempted to sacrifice build quality and profit margins for market share. Build quality was one of the very things Apple enjoyed charging a premium for in the first place, and one of the very things that everyone swore at the top of their lungs Apple would never, ever ... well, so much for that theory. </p> <P> <p>It didn't take long for people to discover how the M-series really didn't hold up in the field. (As someone else put it, "The 'm' stands for 'meh'.") You could compensate for some of that via an OtterBox, but on the whole that $329 would have been better spent on &#151; how embarrassing must this have been &#151; the new Motorola DROID&#8482; RAZR&#8482; R3&#8482;.</p> <P> <p>Apple's first mistake was in assuming everyone wanted was the same two devices over and over, ad infinitum. Up to a point, sure: there's comfort value in knowing there's always an iPhone, same as how it feels like there's always been a VW Bug, or an edition of <em>Catcher in the Rye</em> with the maroon cover. But that wasn't <em>all</em> people wanted, and now it's really showing as the former Apple faithful defect for devices that do more, do it every bit as elegantly, and don't blatantly trade cost for workmanship.</p> <P> <p>Learning from one's mistakes and owning up to them is good practice. After the gigantic stubbed toe of Windows 8, Microsoft gave us a reworked Windows 9 that actually makes touch feel <em>useful</em>, not something tacked on as a sidecar or afterthought. Even RIM seems to have climbed most of the way out of its hole, thanks to a mix of new devices and a smart luring of developers for them.</p> <P> <p>I never thought I would see the day where the iPhone would be considered a brand as quaint as the Walkman or as tarnished as the Ford Pinto, but here we are.</p>2013-01-07T10:30:00ZGoogle Drops 'F' Bomb on DevelopersChanges in the EULA (End User License Agreement) for the Android SDK warn developers of doing anything that might result in the <shudder!> "fragmentation" of Android. As with so many of these agreements, ambiguity is rampant and designed to give the vendor &#151; i.e. Google &#151; the freedom to interpret circumstances to its own benefit. In fact, developers aren't the source of the fragmentation problem, Google's own handset OEM partners are.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/google-drops-f-bomb-on-developers/240145588?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>One of the biggest thorns in Google's side (<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/government/policy/google-settles-ftc-antitrust-inquiry/240145522">aside from the FTC</a>), has been that staple criticism of Android: "fragmented." Now Google's doing something about it, but has bristled a few hairs in the process.</p> <P> <p>But what Google's really fighting isn't <em>fragmentation</em>, which is a programming and infrastructure issue. It's <em>brand dilution</em> &#151; a corporate image issue.</p> <P> <p>The most recent changes involve a modification to <a target="_blank" href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html#download">the licensing agreement for Android's SDK</a>, something tech blogger and journalist Tim Anderson <a target="_blank" href="http://www.itwriting.com/blog/7006-google-fights-android-fragmentation-with-new-proprietary-sdk-terms.html">called out on his blog</a> by comparing the new SDK to the one for the edition installed on his own system. Three clauses in particular stand out:<ol><li>Google expressly owns the IP (intellectual property) for the SDK (section 3.2).</li><li>The SDK cannot be used for anything other than its stated purpose (section 3.3).</li><li>You can't derive your own SDK from the Android SDK (3.4).</li></ol> <P> <p>The last clause in particular even uses the <em>F</em> word explicitly: "You agree that you will not take any actions that may cause or result in the fragmentation of Android, including but not limited to ... a software development kit derived from the SDK."</p> <P> <p>In other words, Google reserves the right to say what could cause "the fragmentation of Android" &#151; which, given how vague that clause is, could be anything at all.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Aug/Android-skins.png" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Android systems from different OEMs &#151;HTC, Samsung and Motorola are shown here &#151; look and operate differently. Google and its partners are responsible.</div> <P> <p>I don't think Google's in the wrong for wanting to keep Android's brand from becoming diluted. But there are two problems with this approach &#151; first and foremost being that you can't put <em>anything</em> in a EULA these days without it being analyzed to death. And a good thing, too: people are sick of having hopelessly open-ended clauses slipped into licensing agreements. They reek either of carelessness on the part of the people who drafted them (legal language and technology <em>still</em> don't mix after all this time), or cynicism and greed.</p> <P> <p>Trying to prevent fragmentation via EULA or, rather, by using the EULA to further lock down the SDK, smells more of a move to keep Google's own lawyers happy than anything else. It won't stop determined third parties, especially those who have a hit-and-run business strategy. Case in point: Aliyun OS, which <a target="_blank" href="https://plus.google.com/112599748506977857728/posts/hRcCi5xgayg">Google's Andy Rubin has claimed is an unattributed fork of Android</a>. Rewriting the EULA to make it easier to charge such folks with wrongdoing smacks of closing the barn door after the stampede &#151; especially since, again, these days it's hard to write an EULA to protect your own interests without ticking off the very people who you're trying to court.</p> <P> <p>The other problem is that most of Android's fragmentation woes aren't because of software. It's been because of hardware, which is all over the map, <i>by design</i>. </p> <P> <p>The incredible disparity of Android devices is part of what made Android both special and annoying. This is what I mean by brand dilution: when anything can be an Android device, the notion of an "Android device" becomes amorphous, and all but meaningless, and Google loses the ability to protect the reputation of the Android brand.</p> <P> <p>Device manufacturers are the big culprit here, for doing what was in their best interests, something which Google should have anticipated. They made their own gratuitous changes to Android to make sure it ran well on the hardware they shipped, and made the best use of whatever device features happened to be available. The downside of this arrangement was that you couldn't predict with any degree of accuracy what an "Android device" would be, or what it could do. </p> <P> <p>Now, many of these rough edges have been smoothed down by the general rise in quality of Android devices and software. I no longer get the impression, save with the most cut-rate, cut-corner products, that there's a sizable amount of current-generation Android hardware that falls below expectations for casual use (not enough internal storage, for instance). Apps are far less device-dependent than they used to be, save for the occasional oddity that requires root privileges (and in <em>that</em> case, it's assumed you know what you're doing anyway).</p> <P> <p>I <em>do</em> still get irked by the way each manufacturer seems compelled to add its own custom skin to Android, which more often than not is just annoying and distracting (hello, Samsung). But Google and the device makers are banking on the fact that the disparity between devices is an <em>aesthetic</em> issue and not really a <em>functional</em> one.</p> <P> <p>If I replace my old Samsung Android phone with a new Motorola Android phone, the user interface differences are jarring at first. It's not like having to sit down at a different workstation at your job. In the meantime, the differences between these skins must be a significant support burden for enterprises that allow Android in a BYOD arrangement.</p> <P> <p>The other major form of Android fragmentation has come from the vastly different versions in heavy use in the field, with version 2.3, (the current version is 4.2) still the most popular. Certainly Google can't blame that on anyone but itself and its partners.</p> <P> <p>"Android" and "fragmented" have been synonymous for too long, but only because that's a convenient way to not talk about the real issues at hand. The worst diluters of Google's brand have been its very hardware partners. Putting the average developer in a bad situation with EULA changes hardly makes things better.</p>2013-01-03T08:30:00ZUbuntu For Phones: Beautiful, Elegant, DoomedHow good could an UbuntuPhone really be? It can't possibly be unique enough and have enough of a value proposition to break into a market that's already dominated by big, powerful players.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/ubuntu-for-phones-beautiful-elegant-doom/240145455?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>On Wednesday, Canonical (the makers of the Ubuntu Linux distribution) came out with a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=cpWHJDLsqTU#!">promotional video</a> advertising ... no, not just another version of Ubuntu, but a <em>phone-based</em> iteration of Ubuntu.</p> <P> <p>Cue deafening silence. </p> <P> <p>I watched the video (see it embedded below) and tried, in vain, to figure out what possible larger strategy is at work here, other than Mark Shuttleworth's pet software project entering yet another iteration that will gain little to no mindshare with anyone who isn't an IT professional.</p> <P> <p>It's not that it doesn't look good. The UbuntuPhone metaphor is pretty, and I liked the combination lock/home screen, and the usage-sorted displays. None of these things, though, are exclusive technologies &#151; there's nothing that says the UI innovations in UbuntuPhone can't be applied elsewhere. (Windows Phone's tile system is similar, and perhaps even a bit more polished.)</p> <P> <iframe width="452" height="254" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cpWHJDLsqTU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <P> <p>The problem, as I see it, is dead simple: Ubuntu is hopelessly late to a party that already ended.</p> <P> <p>Barring a radical discovery of a previously untapped behavioral or use-case niche, the smartphone market is tapped out. There's iOS for people who want it and can afford it; there's Android, for people who want a bit more latitude in terms of device choice (and want not to spend quite as much); there's RIM and the BlackBerry, although it's anyone guess how long that'll last; there's Windows Phone, which ... well, we'll see what kind of market Microsoft can scare up for that. Canonical's not bringing anything to this race other than some cosmetic gloss.</p> <P> <p>The irony is that while sitting here typing this, I can already see one plan of attack that might well work. Use the UbuntuPhone (or whatever they're going to call it) to unseat RIM, and possibly Microsoft Exchange as well. Offer the U-Phone to companies as both a set of client devices <em>and</em> a server messaging appliance that could run on standalone hardware or a VM. (Or, better yet, offer cloud-hosted instances of the server.) Canonical has plenty of experience with creating server iterations of their OS; why don't they put that to good use unseating a dying competitor, instead of trying to chisel into a market that's already sewn up?</p> <P> <p>Answer: because that would be like saying they can't run with the big boys, that's why.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/ubuntu-phone-1.jpg" /> <P> <p>It's been the dream of every big-name Linux shop, at one time or another in their life cycle, to become a household word. Red Hat made some stabs in that direction, but then wisely decided to concentrate its work on the server side of things, and the result has been a solid little business for the company. Various parties have tried sticking Linux distributions in retail packaging and offering them as Windows competitor. All of them failed. Canonical has come the closest to making a dent, but only because they put a bit more polish on the whole package, and not because they created a platform that had its own value proposition the way Android did and does.</p> <P> <p>Android is as close to a consumer version of Linux as we're going to get. Deal with it. It took Google's sweat and blood to make Linux into a consumer product, not just by making the product relatively easy to use (I say "relatively" only because the earlier versions of Android were indeed a horror) but by also creating an app platform that wasn't cobbled together out of a dozen disparate pieces.</p> <P> <p>It's not that there's no culture of useful Linux software, only that the culture of Linux applications has far less to offer the average phone-toting user than the Android App Store. Both because of the extant apps, and because the Android platform was built inside-out for a mobile environment.</p> <P> <p>I wasn't crazy about Android when it first appeared &#151; its 1.x and 2.x incarnations were pretty dodgy, and the hardware was horrific stuff to behold. But over the last two years or so, Android phones have become a force to be reckoned with. They look and run great, the apps are plentiful (albeit with most of them being free apps that front for a paid service, rather than iOS's richer culture of paid apps), and fragmentation and inconsistency between devices is becoming less of an issue than it had been in recent years.</p> <P> <p>If Canonical wants to get anywhere with this project &#151; and they claim they're going to have actual branded phones shipping with it in 2014 &#151; they need to be realistic about how mature the market already is, and where they could realistically get a toehold. You can't just throw phones at the masses anymore.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2013-Jan/ubuntu-phone-4.jpg" />2012-12-31T08:30:00ZBattery Life Boost Coming From New Antenna TechThe amplifier for the data transmission on a mobile phone's antenna is the device's biggest power guzzler, wasting up to 65 percent of its juice through heat. Large increases in battery life may be coming soon through new technology designed to use power for data transmission more efficiently.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/battery-life-boost-coming-from-new-anten/240145379?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>For years the struggle to squeeze more battery life out of wireless devices has focused on two fronts: CPU power consumption and battery capacity. Now, changes on a third, vital front may be in the works: the cellular power amplifier.</p> <P> <p>Cell devices all use a component that translates electricity into radio waves, known as a power amplifier. The biggest problem with power amplifiers is how hideously inefficient they are: about 65-percent of the electricity used to drive one ends up turning into waste heat. This is a big part of the reason your phone starts getting uncomfortably warm when you're watch Netflix or videoconferencing on Skype or FaceTime, and why the battery meter also plummets precipitously around that time.</p> <P> <p>According to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/506491/efficiency-breakthrough-pr omises-smartphones-that-use-half-the-power/">an article at MIT Technology Review</a>, a startup courtesy of two of MIT's electrical engineering professors aims to change all that. <a target="_blank" href="http://etadevices.com/">Eta Devices</a> has a new technology under development &#151; their name for it is "asymmetric multilevel outphasing" &#151; which intelligently modulates power through the amplifier and allows less juice to be wasted when switching from standby to transmit mode or vice versa.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Dec/eta-devices-logo.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The Eta Devices logo</div> <P> <p>Eta's people estimate that the power requirements for a given amplifier could be cut in half this way. What's more, it might also be possible to consolidate the various radios used by a phone into a single chip &#151; another power-savings measure, since it means less silicon to power in the first place.</p> <P> <p>There's an irony in how the race to cut smartphone power consumption has been offset by the very utility of those devices. The more features that appear in each successive generation of phones, the more people use them, and so any attempts to make a smartphone with a battery that lasts more than an average day's use are difficult to achieve. Larger batteries have become standard issue, but that in turn often also means a factory-sealed design (hello, iPhone!) to keep the phone nice and skinny.</p> <P> <p>Smartphone CPUs have also been built from the inside out with minimal power usage in mind. The Qualcomm Snapdragon S4, for instance, can lower the voltage to each of its four cores, or disable them completely, as demand dictates. But those features have to be balanced against the growing demands of users: the more they grow accustomed to apps that require a multi-core phone, or at least perform better on them, the more likely they are to use them and thus spur further power drainage. (As someone once said: "The more they give you, the more you end up needing.")</p> <P> <img style="border:1px solid black;" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Dec/iphone-antenna.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#009999; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;"></div> <P> <p>Data-plan usage is another culprit, since 4G LTE radios use more power than their predecessors <em>and</em> more power than a Wi-Fi connection. Worse, 4G LTE phones switch between 3G and 4G networks to stay connected to one or the other, meaning the phone's burning even more power by keeping two radios active. (I got a major power-savings boost on my old flip-phone by simply disabling 3G entirely, since I didn't ever use data on it.)</p> <P> <p>Much of the engineering of smartphone power conservation has been a refinement of the same mechanisms used in notebooks and PCs: dimming the display, ramping down the CPU's clock speed when it's not in use, reducing the system bus speed during idle time, and so on. There's no one magic bullet, but rather a slew of layered innovations that contribute to the phone's overall power savings.</p> <P> <p>But with the radios themselves, a major source of power drain &#151; and the overriding reason to <em>use</em> a smartphone in the first place &#151; most of the power-management there has revolved around merely toggling radios off when not in use, not in re-thinking the engineering of the radio hardware.</p> <P> <p>What will the actual impact be? When will consumers be able to buy this technology? Eta isn't saying just yet.</p>2012-12-12T09:15:00ZQWERTY Keyboards Are Here To StayAlternative keyboards are voodoo ergonomics. If the keyboard is going to be killed by anything, it'll be by the one holy grail of user interfaces: A direct neural connection between the user and the computer, with all of the fascinating and scary possibilities offered through such a system. The things I'm confident it's not going to be killed by are touchscreens &#151; or, for that matter, other kinds of keyboards.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/desktop-pc/qwerty-keyboards-are-here-to-stay/240144230?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Apart from the floppy disk, has there been any one peripheral for the PC that more people have tried, and failed, to kill, than the keyboard? The floppy finally died thanks to networking-for-all and the USB flash drive, but, in my opinion, the QWERTY keyboard may be with us for another fifty years at this rate. </p> <P> <p>But this is not a complaint. Maybe the reason QWERTY and its cousins will still be around long after I'm gone is because it's far harder to improve on than we think. </p> <P> <p>The other day, I got in the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.trulyergonomic.com/store/index.php">Truly Ergonomic Keyboard</a> &#151; yes, that's its the name &#151; one of the first new keyboards I've seen in a while that uses some mutated layout that the manufacturer claims will improve typing speed and accuracy. Right, because moving the Shift key a half an inch up to where the Tab or Caps Lock keys are, and sticking the Backspace and Tab keys in the middle, is clearly a massive improvement. (What would the term for such a thing be? "Voodoo ergonomics", perhaps?) </p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Dec/truly-ergonomic-keyboard.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Truly bewildering - The Truly Ergonomic Keyboard</div> <P> <p>Yeah, I'm skeptical. The vaunted health benefits of an ergonomic keyboard seem to bulk very tiny compared to all the other things you could do. Get a good chair with a footrest; use proper sitting posture; take regular breaks from typing. If you ask me, it's easier &#151; and overall, better &#151; to develop those habits than it is to retain yourself on a device where the Enter key is where the spacebar normally is. Plus, the typing speed I can muster on a plain old QWERTY is nothing to sneeze at, anyway. I've tried retraining myself on an ergonomic board, and the increase in speed has either been negligible or not worth the hassle involved to retrain. If any of these devices really provided such a massive boost over a regular keyboard, the difference would be quickly self-evident. </p> <P> <p>The only people who hate QWERTY, from what I can tell, are Dvorak-layout fans and efficiency experts. Everyone else lives with it because it performs tolerably well, it's what they've always known, and because no real breakthrough has been made in input technology to unseat it yet. </p> <P> <p>The biggest reason such devices don't catch on is not just because they buck existing trends, but because they also provide no quantifiable improvement over what we already have. </p> <P> <p>Here's one example of a tangible improvement: the mouse versus the light-pen. (Light pens have been around a really long time; see them in use in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066769/">the 1971 movie The Andromeda Strain</a>.) The light-pen allowed you to point to a spot on the screen, but its precision was complicated by the fact that you were partly blocking the very thing you aimed at.</p> <P> <p>The mouse solved this problem by abstracting <i>what</i> you were pointing at from <i>how</i> you were pointing at it. It took some getting used to, but because you were learning an entirely new mode of interaction, not ditching an existing one that did the job anyway. The fact that a mouse, or some similar pointing device, ships with just about every computing device above a certain size is proof of how useful this turned out to be. (The mouse also works with a greater variety of devices.) </p> <P> <p>"But what about touchscreens!?" All right, I heard you in the back. Don't hold your breath for touchscreens to kill the keyboard, either. </p> <P> <p>Besides, why would you <i>want</i> that? The only reason we have touchscreens on tablets and smartphones isn't because touchscreens are such a great improvement over physical switches. It's because they simplify the design, and for something meant to be portable and light, the less hardware, the better. Small wonder why Microsoft's engineers labored to make the Surface keyboard so minimal: they didn't want people to feel like they were lugging around anything extra. </p> <P> <p>All of the efforts I've seen so far to make typing on a screen less clumsy have been half-measures. Sorry, vibrate-on-press isn't the same as an actual keystroke. Tactile feedback is only something you give up because you have to, not because you want to. Most of the quick fixes I've seen, like the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/tablets/touchfire-ke yboard-overlay-makes-ipad-ty/240003335">TouchFire</a> for the iPad, are just that: quick fixes, not actual solutions. Only something like <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/swype-android-beta-adds-dragon-speech-ha/240002655">Swype</a> seems to be a step in the right direction. The speed improvement I get from using Swype is actually quite substantial... except for the one time out of five when my finger spazzes out and I have to delete a word and start over. I suspect that drives the average way down. </p> <P> <p>And then there's voice recognition, which I admit has improved quite a bit since my experiments with products like Dragon NaturallySpeaking. It also works well for phones. The few times I've resorted to Google's voice-driven search system it's given me results that were both coherent and useful. </p> <P> <p>But for a production environment like a PC, speech is less useful for one major reason: Typing is unambiguous, speech far less so. The computer may be able to make contextual inferences about whether or not I said "to", "too", or "two" (or, heck, "tu" if I'm throwing in some French to be sassy), but in the time it takes to fix such mistakes &#151; far less, really &#151; I could have just typed the words in question and be done with it. Worse, much of the kind of typing I do doesn't lend itself to being easily processed by voice recognition. (I should note none of this is meant as a slap at those who use voice recognition because they don't have a choice.) </p> <P> <p>If the keyboard is going to be killed by anything, it'll be by the one holy grail of user interfaces: A direct neural connection between the user and the computer, with all of the fascinating and scary possibilities offered through such a system. The things I'm confident it's not going to be killed by are touchscreens &#151; or, for that matter, other kinds of keyboards.</p>2012-12-07T08:40:00ZT-Mobile Ending Phone Subsidies: A Victory For TransparencyThe traditional subsidized phone contract that has made mobile phones seem more affordable is in fact a convoluted scheme to maximize carrier money and leverage on the customer. T-Mobile's plan to switch to unlocked phones and a "Value" package, in which you pay for the phone in installments clearly spelled out on the bill, lets customers make clearer decisions.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/t-mobile-ending-phone-subsidies-a-victor/240144021?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Two bits of news from T-Mobile shook up the mobile communications world this week. First was word that it is preparing &#151; at long freakin' last &#151; to sell the iPhone on its network in 2013.</p> <P> <p>The other bit of news, though, has massive implications for the rest of the mobile telecom world: T-Mobile is preparing to end device subsidies on its contracts. </p> <P> <p>Instead of having the cost of phones subsidized over the course of a two-year contract, T-Mobile is shifting to an unsubsidized "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/Packages/ValuePackages.aspx">Value package </a>" system. Under this plan, you can either pay full price for the device up front, pay for it in installments that are explicitly spelled out on your bill, or bring in your own unlocked device.</p> <P> <img style="border:1px solid black;" src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Dec/T-Mobile-Store.png" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#FF00FF; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The magenta glow of the typical T-Mo store.</div> <P> <p>Why do this? In big part because Value Plans are apparently a massive draw for T-Mobile customers. According to <a target="_blank" href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/t-mobile-ceo-confirms-the-iphone-and-the-death-of-phone-subsidies/">a GigaOm article</a>, about 80% of T-Mo's new device activations are on Value plans. These plans work with one or more phones; include unlimited data as per their more conventional, subsidized plans; and often allow some $15-$20 savings per month.</p> <P> <p>Most people are drawn to subsidy contracts because they pay less up front for a flashy new device &#151; $99, instead of the $500 or more that many late-model, top-notch smartphones cost out of pocket. The iPhone is at the high end of that curve, and can run as much as $800 or more.</p> <P> <p>The problem is that you're paying back the cost of the device on terms that are almost entirely detached from actually buying it. The carrier, over time, makes far more money off you that way than if you had simply bought the device up front.</p> <P> <p>So why would T-Mobile want to embrace a new business model that makes it <em>less</em> money? Possibly because it believes it can make up the difference in customer volume, loyalty, and possibly plan upsales. It made a fair amount of noise to tempt iPhone customers onto its network, and now that it's planning to offer it directly, it sounds like it wants to provide multiple iPhone on-ramps to T-Mobile.</p> <P> <p>The one thing T-Mobile won't do, as per the GigaOm article, is provide the iPhone &#151; or any other device &#151; via a conventional subsidy contract. What it might do is offer devices (again, possibly including the iPhone itself) available for purchase on installments, with each installment spelled out on the bill instead of being absorbed wholesale into the contract. This way you can actually see how much you're spending on the device &#151; a bit of much-appreciated transparency.</p> <P> <p>Now the biggest question: What if the other carriers decide to do this as well?</p> <P> <p>In time, I can't see them <em>not</em> doing it. Subsidy contracts have been a big reason why smart phone uptake has been so swift and ubiquitous. But it's put too much leverage in the hands of the carriers, narrowed the range of useful handset choices, and tied users to a financing model that's unlike anything else they use. Imagine if, when you bought broadband for your home, you could only use it with one of a number of PCs sold to you by the cable company. Nobody would sit still for that &#151; in the same way people rejected having to use only the in-home networking equipment provided by the cable company, because most of it was terrible. (And let's not forget how it wasn't until the 1980s that the land-line telcos were <em>required</em> to allow users to buy their own phones.)</p> <P> <p>Breaking out of the subsidy model means incentives to get phones on <em>our</em> terms. Back when I was about to renew my cell contract, I flirted with the idea of buying an unlocked phone from an electronics house like NewEgg; financing the device through it with an 18-month, same-as-cash plan; and adding it manually to my account by simply swapping SIMs. And again, I balked for the same reason everyone else did: I wasn't sure I'd actually save money that way. Now that some hard numbers have started to trickle in from the carrier itself, it's looking more like a real option.</p> <P> <p>I suspect the greatest resistance to ending phone subsidies, though, isn't going to come from the carriers. It's going to come from the consumers themselves, who are so used to those low costs of entry that they don't realize how badly it hurts them in the long run. Here's hoping they'll see the light once someone waves a fully-itemized balance sheet under their nose.</p> <P> <p><em>Tip of the hat to GigaOm.</em></p>2012-11-21T08:02:00ZSkype For Android 3.0 Excels At Voice, TransfersSkype for Android 3.0 improves voice quality and adds new tablet-specific features -- but requires the latest hardware and Android platform for the best results.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/mobile-applications/skype-for-android-30-excels-at-voice-tra/240142455?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>The newest version of Skype for Android comes closer than ever to the desktop version, both in features and audio quality.</p> <P> <p>More evidence of Microsoft's integration with Skype is showing up with each revision of the program. Now when you set up Skype for Android, you can sign in with either an existing Skype account, or a Microsoft account -- the latter of which can be used to also merge in any contacts from Microsoft Messenger. This is the same account you use to log into Windows 8, so expect Microsoft to ask you for this account a lot in the future. On the same subject, Microsoft has announced that <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.windows.com/windows_live/b/windowslive/archive/2012/11/06/the-next-chapter-for-the-windows-live-messenger-network.aspx">Messenger has been end-of-lifed</a> and that Skype will be the future consumer solution for text chat.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/Skype-for-Android-1.png" /> <P> <p>Users of the desktop edition of Skype shouldn't have trouble navigating or using the Android edition. Obviously the interface has been simplified a great deal, but all the important stuff -- your contact list, the recent call list, the phone dialer, and your profile -- are all quickly accessible from the home screen. Skype also keeps a status icon in the system tray whenever you're signed in.</p> <P> <p>The audio quality of Skype calls, at its best, is better than anything I've been able to get from a cell phone or a land line, thanks to Skype's proprietary SILK audio codec. Those who have used Skype on a good connection and have heard how much better it is than the tinny, compressed quality of a phone call will know what I'm talking about. Obviously the quality is determined in great part by the connection speed and the hardware in use on either end, but my connections to other users all sounded excellent, with only minimal glitches (probably due more to overzealous noise cancellation than connection issues).</p> <P> <p>Video calling didn't work as well. The picture quality was meager to begin with, and will also vary widely depending on the connection and the camera hardware. My test phone, the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/droid-razr-m-slim-snazzy-entry-level-and/240007135">Motorola Droid Razr M</a>, was able to use both front- and back-facing cameras without a hitch. One minor issue, which Skype's engineers are looking into, was the way Skype couldn't access the speaker on that particular model of phone; it would only route audio over the headset or earpiece. This might be a problem specific to this phone.</p> <P> <p>Another thing to be careful of is battery consumption. Depending on the device and the network connection type, you might see Skype eating into your battery life fairly quickly -- another reason why it doesn't always work as a substitute for regular voice calling.</p> <P> <p>Aside from the usual text-chat functions, Skype for Android also lets you send and receive files, with no restrictions on file type or size. The whole process works about the same as with the desktop app, so again there are few surprises. The only exception might be if you receive a type of file you don't have a handler for on your Android device.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/Skype-for-Android-2.png" /> <P> <p>One major missing feature is group video chat. Talking with up to 10 people at once with live video connections is only available in the desktop version of Skype, and requires at least one paid Skype user on the call. That said, the amount of processing power needed for group calls means this function isn't likely to show up in any mobile version of the program for a while, at least not until the hardware becomes powerful enough to support it. Another widely-cited missing feature is support for portrait-mode orientation on tablets, although it works fine on the phone I tested with.</p> <P> <p>Skype for Android 3.0 requires a device with at least Android 2.1, 27 MB of free memory, and 800 MHz or better processing power. Video calls require Android 2.2 or better, and of course a device with a camera. It doesn't have to be a front-facing camera, although obviously that helps.</p> <P> <p>Name: <a target="_blank" href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skype.raider&amp;hl=en">Skype for Android 3.0</a><blockquote><i>The latest version of Skype for Android improves voice quality and adds new tablet-specific features, but requires the latest hardware and Android platform for the best results.</i></blockquote> Price: Free. (Certain Skype services are for-pay.)<br /> Pro: <ul><li>Excellent audio quality.</li> <li>Also supports text chat and file transfers.</li></ul> Con: <ul><li>Mediocre picture quality.</li> <li>No support for group video chat.</li> <li>Oddball bugs.</li></ul></p> <P>2012-11-16T09:00:00ZDazzling Screen In Supersized HTC Droid DNAHTC's Droid DNA for Verizon doesn't have much in the way of business-oriented features and might be too big for some hands, but it's powerful, well-built, graced with a gorgeous 1080p screen, and priced right.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240142183?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>HTC bills its Droid DNA as the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-droid-dna-boast-most-advanced-smart/240124924">most advanced</a> smart phone yet. That's a major claim to make, and of course it's certain to be untrue by this time next year. But what HTC has delivered sits nicely alongside the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/Droid-r azr-m-slim-snazzy-entry-level-and/240007135">Motorola Droid M</a> -- and the other recent Droid models -- as an upscale consumer-oriented, as opposed to business-oriented, Android Jelly Bean-powered smart phone. At $199 with a new two-year Verizon contract, it's in the same price range as high-end Droid phones like the Maxx.</p> <P> <p>For those who complain about how big smart phones are getting, the 142-gram (5-ounce), 141-mm-by-70.5-mm DNA is at the outer limit of a phone that can be held comfortably in one hand. The 5" screen alone is big enough to swallow the entire body of the Droid M whole -- probably inevitable given the DNA's specs of full-HD 1080p and 440 ppi FHD. But the DNA is also incrementally slimmer -- 9.73 mm tapering to 4mm -- without the unpleasantly flimsy feel of some current smart phones. The Gorilla Glass face has a rounded-down outer edge that makes swipe and fling actions feel all the more comfortable. And the guts of the phone are also impressive: a quad-core 1.5-GHz Snapdragon S4 processor, 2 GB of RAM, 16 GB of internal storage, and the usual array of sensors and connectivity features such as Bluetooth 4.0, NFC, HDMI via MHL, and so on.</p> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/DNAvsRAZR-620.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/DNAvsRAZR-620.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">An entire Motorola Droid M fits in the footprint of the HTC Droid DNA's screen -- but what a great screen it is.</div> <P> <p>On the downside, I wasn't impressed with the lack of a memory card slot -- it's built-in 16 GB or nothing -- and the awkward flex cover for the USB power/data connector. I wondered if that was created as an incentive for more people to use the wireless charging function. Also awkward is the placement of the power button on top, where it's a little hard to reach given the size of the phone, and the lack of any other buttons save the volume rocker. Finally, the SIM card can only be removed with the aid of an included tool, and the 2020 mAh battery's not user removable either, but I'm used to seeing both of those things in late-model smart phones.</p> <P> <p>The phone's screen is the big attraction, and not just for its full 1080p resolution, but its brightness and color. I was dubious about how comfortable it would be to watch native HD content on such a screen, but clarity and sharpness are top-notch. I watched an hour or more of videos without eyestrain. However, including Beats Audio in the DNA (as with many other HTC phones) isn't much of a selling point for me. It consists of little more than a dedicated headphone amp subsystem and custom-tuned EQ setting, and it's good that it can be turned off because not all music benefits from the bass-boosted sound it delivers.</p> <P> <p>HTC has its own UI skin for Android, called Sense+. It isn't quite as smartly put together as Motorola's Ice Cream Sandwich interface for the Droid M, which I'm realizing in retrospect now is very well thought out indeed, but Sense+ does the job and doesn't get in the way to the degree that, say, Samsung's Android interface did. Smart touches abound in Sense+, like the quick access to system settings from the main pull-down menu, or the quick access to frequently-used apps from a subdivision of the app menu. I tend to clutter my phone's home screens with icons, so this is a welcome feature. Also included are HTC's <a href="http://www.htc.com/www/htc-sense/call/">custom gestural controls</a>, which can be enabled or disabled. I especially liked the one where you turn the phone over to activate the speakerphone.</p> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/DNAedge.jpg"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/reviews/2012-Nov/DNAedge-620.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">The DNA is 9.73 mm at its thickest, tapering to a mere 4mm on the edges. Note the SIM card slot at left, which can only be opened with an included tool.</div> <P> <p>The cameras in the DNA also resemble the cameras in <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/htc-mic rosoft-debut-new-flagship-8s-8x-p/240007618">HTC's Windows Phone 8 devices</a> -- a massively wide-angle (88&#176;) front-facing 2.1-megapixel camera, and a full HD 8-megapixel main camera. Because there's no dedicated camera button, the camera has what's called Sightseeing Mode. If the camera is the currently active application when you press the power button, the lock screen is bypassed and you go directly to the camera, ready to shoot with no waiting.</p> <P> <p>A few explicitly business-oriented features ship with the DNA. The most obvious and useful is the built-in mail app, which can work natively with Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync, Windows Live Hotmail, Yahoo!, AOL and any generic POP3/IMAP email source. Gmail can be added manually as an IMAP service, or through Google's native Gmail app. Alas, there's no device-level encryption, a necessary feature for any business-class AnDroid product.</p> <P> <p>Also included is a pre-loaded instance of American Express's <a href="https://www.serve.com/">Serve</a> app, its version of a PayPal-like electronic payment service, which might well come in handy for travelers trying to manage spending. There's also unfortunately a fair load of apps you might want nothing to do with such as Zappos and NFL Mobile, but mercifully most of those can be disabled.</p> <P> <p>Name: <a href="http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-Droid-dna-verizon/">HTC Droid DNA</a> <blockquote><i>HTC's newest entry in the Droid lineup for Verizon doesn't have much in the way of business-oriented features and might be too big for petite hands, but it's a well-built and powerful; sports a gorgeous 1080p display; and is priced competitively.</i></blockquote> Price: <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&amp;action=viewPhoneDetail&amp;selectedPhoneId=6103">$199 with two-year Verizon contract.</a>; $599 full retail price<br /> Pro:<ul><li>Great 1080p HD screen.</li> <li>Powerful quad-core processor.</li> <li>Slender design with appealing-to-the-touch curved bezel.</li> <li>Wireless charging.</li></ul> Con:<ul><li>Few business-targeted features.</li> <li>No device-level encryption</li> <li>No microSD card slot.</li> <li>Might be too big for smaller hands.</li></ul></p>2012-11-13T14:02:00ZHTC Droid DNA Boast: 'Most Advanced Smart Phone'Citing its high-end hardware, HTC says its new Droid DNA is the most advanced smart phone to hit the market yet, and the "ultimate" Droid.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240124924?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>With the flood of smart phones that have deluged the market toward the end of this year, it's getting harder for any one phone to distinguish itself -- barring maybe a new iPhone, and look how well that turned out.</p> <P> <p>HTC on Tuesday threw down a gauntlet that, if nothing else, has bravado going for it. At an event in New York it unveiled the Verizon-exclusive 4G LTE-connected Droid DNA, which it billed as "the most advanced smart phone on the market" and "the ultimate Droid."</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Nov/HTD-Droid-DNA-stage-452.jpg" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">At the HTC Droid DNA launch event.</div> <P> <p>Their words, not ours. But the DNA, which was <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/htc-verizon-to-unveil-hd-phablet/240062565?">revealed earlier this month</a> to be a U.S. version of the HTC Butterfly, has some chops to back up such a boast.</p> <P> <p>The DNA sports a 5-inch, full-1080p, 440-ppi screen, which runs to edge to edge and thus doesn't push the phone into full-blown phablet territory. Android 4.1 Jellybean drives the phone courtesy of a quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 1.5-GHz processor (the "Krait"), backed with 2 GB of RAM and 16 GB of internal storage. Front and back f2.0 cameras sport similar attributes to the optics found in the Windows Phone-powered HTC 8X.</p> <P> <p>HTC design director Jonah Becker used the DNA's physical specs to make side swipes at the Samsung Galaxy Note and Galaxy SIII lines, nothing that the DNA is slimmer than the Note and has a brighter display than the SIII. In addition to Beats Audio, a familiar presence on HTC phones now, the DNA also comes with the relatively unobtrusive Sense 4+ user-interface skin. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/wireless-power-is-a-stupid-gimmick/232901493">Wireless charging</a> also is included, for those who have the charging-pad hardware to support it, such as the Duracell Powermat.</p> <P> <p>We had the chance to try out the phone at the event, and were impressed with what we saw. The phone's polycarbonate plastic body is remarkably light and slender, without having the unpleasantly flexible feel of a low-grade phone. The display handles full 1080p content without smearing or blurring, and has the same strongly-defined color that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/droid-razr-m-slim-snazzy-entry-level-and/240007135">we saw</a> on the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/smart-phones/motorolas-new-droid-razr-makes-a-deeper/240006814">Motorola Droid Razr M</a>.</p> <P> <a target="_blank" href="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Nov/HTD-Droid-DNA-hand.JPG"><img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Nov/HTD-Droid-DNA-hand-452.jpg" /></a><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; ;font-style: italic; text-align:right;">Click to see larger image.</div> <P> <p>Motorola's earlier Droid phones, with their thicker profiles and slide-out keyboards, appealed to a slightly more professional market. The new Droid Razr M, though, is designed for the same market HTC has been targeting this year: people who want a powerful and good-looking phone, but want more lifestyle features than they do work-related functions.</p> <P> <p>Verizon is the exclusive U.S. dealer for the DNA, which will ship Nov. 21 at $199 with a two-year contract. Pre-sales <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/index.html">begin Tuesday</a>.</p>2012-11-13T08:32:00ZCEA: Tablets And Smartphones Still King In 2013As the markets for smart phones and tablets have grown, the markets for other consumer electronics products, such as dedicated GPS and point-and-shoot cameras, have eroded. According to the Consumer Electronics Association, the real news in 2013 will be the market growth of UltraHD (4K) televisions and automotive products.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240124894?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>When reps from the Consumer Electronics Association took the stage Tuesday in New York for a sneak-preview event for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cesweb.org/Home.aspx">the 2013 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas</a>, they had one announcement that took nobody by surprise: tablets and smartphones sales were way up in 2012, and will continue to rise in 2013. But they also forecast a few surprises, not least of which being a remarkable amount of projected uptake for UltraHD (4K) televisions and automotive products. </p> <P> <p>CEA director of industry analysis Steve Koenig, and CEA chief economist and senior director of research Shawn DuBravac, described what they saw as being the major trends for consumer electronics for the rest of the year and next year. Smartphones and tablets were the most obvious winners both for the 2012 holiday season and 2013 overall. The generic category of "mobile connected devices," which includes smartphones, e-readers, and tablets, is collectively on the rise, along with connected household devices such as smart TVs. </p> <P> <p>The most obvious effect -- the explosion in tablet sales -- is backed by impressive numbers. Estimates for tablet sales in fourth-quarter 2012 are up a whopping 112% -- 32 million units for the season -- over the same period last year. Smartphones don't make as big a showing, but are still significant: 8% of the adults polled for their holiday wish lists asked for smartphones, versus 16% for tablets. A clear sign of how far tablets have come is in another statistic: By 2013, the total number of tablets shipped -- 100 million in just the U.S. -- almost will be on par with the number of smartphones shipped this year, 108 million. </p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/news/2012-Nov/tablets-and-phones.png" /> <P> <p>As anyone who's replaced their Garmin with an iPhone can tell you, tablets and smartphones both have cannibalized markets for other consumer technology products. Point-and-shoot digital cameras, camcorders, and game consoles have also all had their market share eroded by other portable devices in different measures. </p> <P> <p>Not all of these shifts are exclusively because of the rise of mobile devices, though. Messrs. Koenig and DuBravac both noted how many of those erosions are also driven by other factors. With point-and-shoot cameras, for instance, at least some of its market share has been lost to people looking for more advanced camera types such as D-SLRs, or newly-emerging form factors, such as action/wearable cameras.</p> <P> <p>Another cited phenomenon is how tablets and smartphones are serving more often as "hub connection" devices -- nexuses for health and fitness, home management, or other connected-life peripherals. Without setting a timetable, the CEA folks expected many in-home health technology innovations to allow a good many tests we'd normally perform in a doctor's office to be done without leaving the house. One such test involved adding a breath-test sensor to one's phone, which could be used to diagnose liver or kidney function, or provide blood sugar measurements for a diabetic. </p> <P> <p>What everyone seems to agree on is the continued erosion of the desktop PC and notebook market. In the wish-list survey, 7% of adults asked for a notebook, but only 2% wanted a new desktop PC. </p> <P> <p>Another surprising prediction: TVs. Sales of large flat-panel TVs in general are stable -- 10.6 million shipped in the fourth quarter of 2011, beating estimates by 1.2 million. About 10.5 million are estimated to be shipped in the fourth quarter of 2012. What's on the rise is the sales proportion of jumbo-screen TVs -- 60 inches and up -- compared to sets 20 inches and smaller. The jumbos peaked at 400,000 units shipped in the last quarter of 2011; the smaller sets sank to 300,000 as of the second quarter of 2012. </p> <P> <p>Jumbo sets are booming despite their equally big prices. The Sony 84" XBR-84X900, for example, lists for a wallet-devouring $25,000. CES seems to believe those rising sales figures will translate into equally explosive sales for UltraHD 4K sets, which it estimates will start at 20,000 in 2013 but rise over the next four years to 2.5 million in 2016. </p> <P> <p>What remains unanswered is whether native 4K content, which will show off such sets at their best, will also come to market during that time. No home video form factor currently supports it, and over-the-air broadcast standards are only just now being considered for it. The most likely way to proffer 4K content for such sets is via digital delivery -- e.g., the Ultraviolet content-locker system that also figured into the CEA's talk about their entertainment industry relations. It's also not clear if these five-figure "consumer" devices actually are being sold to consumers or re-purposed for boardrooms, one possible explanation for accelerated future uptake. </p> <P> <p>CEA also noted a trend that even it found surprising: the rising presence of in-car technology as a marketing factor in the automotive industry. A screenshot from Ford's site depicted the 2013 Focus and 2013 Escape, with the in-car tech getting more aggressive billing than miles per gallon or the crash-test rating.</p>2012-11-08T08:31:00ZMobile Office: Partial Functionality Not EnoughThe rumors are hot again that Microsoft will release an Office version for the iPad and iPhone, but all indications are that it will be little more than a document viewer, of which there are many already for iOS. Microsoft already has a far more capable Office Mobile for Surface, but even that is missing many important features, like editing Excel pivot tables and using Word revisions.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240062606?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>The rumors were true: Microsoft has versions of Office coming for the iPhone, iPad and Android, all slated to be released in early 2013. That said, don't ditch your Intel- (or AMD-) powered notebook just yet: we've got a long way to go before all of Office is <em>that</em> portable.</p> <P> <p>The Verge <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/7/3612422/microsoft-office-mobile-ipad-iphone-android-screenshots">recently reported</a> taking a sneak peek at editions of Microsoft Office for various mobile platforms. But based on what they're reporting, what we're getting -- at least at first -- amounts to little more than a Microsoft-sanctioned document viewer.</p> <P> <p>Office Mobile, as it's called, is quickly shaping up to be little more than a read-only front end for an Office 365 subscription. Some editing features are going to be enabled in the product, but if Office 365 itself is any hint, they're not going to have a fraction of the functionality found in the Microsoft Office we all know and use. It's little more than an officially-branded reader, a way to get people on board the train.</p> <P> <p>In time it could gain more sophisticated functionality. But what about now? What's ironic is how Microsoft has, in a way, already created and released a mobile version of Microsoft Office that's fully compatible with its full-blown counterpart: Office for the Windows RT edition of Microsoft Surface. It's not feature-for-feature identical to the x86/x64 edition, but it's close enough that vastly more people will feel comfortable with it than they will with what Microsoft currently has planned for Android or iOS.</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/Office-Surface-RT.png" /> <P> <p>The people who use Office a lot -- I include myself in that number -- take its feature set seriously. Excel, for instance: if you're a diehard Excel buff, can you imagine living without pivot tables, or any of the other super-crunchy CPU-intensive features that would make a mobile device slow down to a grinding crawl? And even if you opt for the RT edition of Office, you're still not all the way home. Among other things, Pivot tables can be used on the RT version of Office, but not created or edited -- and you need to <a target="_blank" href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/home-and-student/office-home-student-rt-preview-FX103210361.aspx">be a licensed Office 2013 organization</a> to use Office RT legally in a business setting.</p> <P> <p>Office RT might be the most capable of the Office-on-mobiles products, but there's a long list of Office features it doesn't support: <ul><li>No macros, add-Ins, forms, or custom programs (Word, Excel, PowerPoint).</li> <li>No send email features (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote).</li> <li>No automatic SkyDrive sync integration (Word, Excel, PowerPoint).</li> <li>No editing equations with equation editor 3.0 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint).</li> <li>No "Lync file download" because there's no Lync on RT (all the more remarkable because <a target="_blank" href="https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/microsoft-lync-2010-for-iphone/id484293461?mt=8">there is a Lync for iOS</a>.)</li> <li>Word only: no grammar checking for certain language versions of Office (it's a long list -- 15 languages). Spell checking and other proofing components are available for more languages.</li> <li>Excel only: No creating data models.</li> <li>PowerPoint only: No SharePoint slide library ActiveX control, no support for certain legacy media formats, no PowerPoint flash video playback, and no recording narrations.</li> <li>OneNote: No audio and video recording from within OneNote, no importing a document through an attached scanner, and no keyword searching in embedded audio and video.</li></ul></p> <P> <p>People who only need casual document editing, even on mobile devices, now have plenty of options, many of them free: OpenOffice, Office Web Apps, Google Docs, you name it. Even iOS itself comes with Office document viewers, pitifully weak as they might be. There's no shortage of this stuff out there, and the quality of it has improved markedly over the past five years. But none of it is a substitute for the breadth of features in full-blown editions of Office, many of which you only retrospectively realize you needed. I wouldn't want to make an investment in a "Mini-Me Office" where change tracking no longer worked, or where font choices no longer showed up properly, or my style declarations didn't apply, or ... you get the idea.</p> <P> <p>Shoehorning any desktop app into a mobile form factor is always a dicey proposition. Limitations on device space, processing power, screen real estate, and the functionality of the platform all stack the deck against you. This isn't limited to productivity apps like Office, either. Consider Google Chrome for Android. It only bears a passing resemblance to its desktop counterpart, but attempts to make up for this by allowing back-end synchronization of your bookmarks and recently-visited pages. I don't have trouble using it, mind you, it's just that I can see why it had to be so radically reworked to be a mobile app.</p> <P> <p>Right now, a fully-mobile, fully-featured version of Office is either impossible or impractical. But that only poses a problem for the people trying to bring such a thing to market, not existing Office users. Those who take Office seriously will stick with the hardware -- and software -- they've become comfortable with to get their work done, and those who only need a limited subset of features haven't made themselves dependent on Office anyway.</p> <P> <p>We're still a long way from someone offering a serious mobile alternative to Office as we know it, and what Microsoft is planning isn't about to change that.</p>2012-11-07T16:17:00ZVerizon Wireless Waives Billing For Some Sandy VictimsVerizon says customers in parts of New York and New Jersey -- those affected by Hurricane Sandy -- won't be billed for domestic voice or text between Oct. 29 and Nov. 16.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240062610?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>In a gesture of goodwill, Verizon <a target="_blank" href="http://m-support.verizonwireless.com/information/sandy-faq.html?email=Responsys&amp;CMP=EMC-C-S-HSV2">announced on its website</a> that customers in "portions of New York and New Jersey" -- those affected by Hurricane Sandy&nbsp; -- "will not be billed usage charges for domestic voice and text usage incurred between Oct. 29 and Nov. 16 2012."</p> <P> <p>The waiving of fees is automatic. Verizon customers do not need to take any action. </p> <P> <p>Residents of the following areas are eligible: <blockquote><i><p>New York:&nbsp; Bronx County, Kings County, Nassau County, New York County, Putnam County, Queens County, Richmond County, Rockland County, Suffolk County and Westchester County.</p> <P> <p>New Jersey: Atlantic City, Bergen County, Burlington County, Camden County, Cape May County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Gloucester County, Hudson County, Hunterdon County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Monmouth County, Morris County, Ocean County, Passaic County, Salem County, Somerset County, Sussex County, Union County and Warren County.</p></i></blockquote></p> <P> <p>Credit is being provided not by refunds, but by simply having no usage charges listed for voice or text activity during the time period in question. Customers who have signed up for usage alerts might still receive spurious warnings that they are near or over their voice or text allotment, but these have no impact on the waiver, said Verizon.</p> <P> <p>Those not in any of the above areas can call 1-800-922-0204 and ask for a waiver "on a case-by-case basis."</p> <P> <p>Verizon has been engaged in a number of mobile-centric relief efforts for customers who have been hit by Sandy, such as deploying <a href="http://news.verizonwireless.com/news/2012/11/device-charging-stations-hurricane-sandy.html">mobile device charging stations</a>, providing charging and free domestic calling at retail locations that remained open, and suspending late fees during the post-storm cleanup period. AT&T has a similar mobile phone charging initiative, but the <em>Huffington Post</em> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/02/att-charging-station-red-hook -brooklyn_n_2067944.html">reported</a> that one of the mobile charging stations deployed to the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn was mistakenly deployed without needed hardware.</p>2012-11-02T09:02:00ZCrapware Lives On Windows 8Windows 8 is a clean slate in many ways. But one scourge that is not gone is crapware, a.k.a. bloatware, junkware, trialware, and stupid games that drag down the performance and experience of so many Windows PCs. We asked Acer, Toshiba, Dell, Samsung and Lenovo what they preload on their Windows 8 systems. Some PCs are cleaner than others. The surprise? A Microsoft store might be the best place to buy.http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/240012719?cid=SBX_iwk_related_mostpopular_Enterprise_Software_aroundtheweb<p>Fire up a shiny new Windows 8 ultrabook or an all-in-one from a major vendor offering such a product this fall, and you're likely to see something you thought would by now have been banished from the PC world: crapware. Tons of it. Performance-sapping "system protection" software, productivity applications you don't need, media organizers you'll never use.</p> <P> <p>Why, after all this time and so much negative press, do PC manufacturers still ship their best and brightest PCs with a dumpster's worth of software no one cares about, and which harms system performance and stability to boot?</p> <P> <img src="http://twimgs.com/informationweek/byte/commentary/2012-Nov/bloat.png" /><div style="margin:4px 0 0 0; padding:0; color:#999900; font-size:small; font-style: italic; text-align:right;">"Bloatware" on Windows systems has long been one of Apple's selling points.</div> <P> <p>The biggest reason: it helps offset cost. The makers of many of those programs pay the PC manufacturers to pre-load their systems with such apps. Those trial versions of anti-virus suites or "starter" versions of Microsoft Office are there to help up-sell users to the real thing. Another apparent reason is the "out-of-box experience" theory -- the idea that a user will consider a PC to be more worth his money if it comes with certain types of software functionality available the minute he hits the power switch.</p> <P> <p>This latter argument hasn't been true for ages now for two reasons. One, most everyone with even modest PC experience has specific, preferred programs they'd rather rely on for such things. They're more likely to just load those in and pick up where they left off. Two, as more of the average user's experience moves online and into a Web browser, preloaded software becomes all the more a white elephant (or red herring, depending on which metaphor you find most fitting).</p> <P> <p>We got in touch with representatives from several major PC makers -- Dell, HP, Toshiba, Samsung, Acer, Lenovo -- and asked them for a rundown of what software is being pre-loaded into their new Windows 8 machines. The results we got fit into roughly three categories:<ul><ol><li>Software provided by the OEM for the sake of system functionality (e.g., hardware drivers, vital system-management tools).</li> <li>Software provided by the OEM for the sake of optional added functionality specific to the system (such as Samsung's S Pen software).</li> <li>Software provided by third parties (trial software).</li></ol></ul></p> <P> <p>The first category is hard to argue with: few people want to snap open a spanking new PC and discover the camera or touchpad doesn't work. The second can be reasonable, like the S Pen apps, but is often more questionable, because many of those programs are badly written and add little to the user's experience. The program that looks for Sony-specific updates on my Sony VAIO notebook, for instance, hangs for minutes on end, for no particular good reason, whenever I restore the system from sleep.</p> <P> <p>The third category, trialware and junkware, is the most egregious. I can't count the number of times I had to troubleshoot someone else's system because the preloaded Roxio CD/DVD burning package's drivers were doing horrible, unpredictable things to the rest of the system, or because some buggy variety of factory-added antivirus software was creating more problems than it solved.</p> <P> <p>Here's what we got back from the PC makers in question, regarding what OEM and third-party apps are loaded into many of their most recent Windows 8 machines. In the case of Lenovo we got the software list from their product pages.</p> <P> <TABLE BORDER=1 CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0> <TR><TH style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Manufacturer</TH><TH style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">OEM software</TH><TH style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">3rd-party</TH></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://www.samsung.com/global/ativ/ativ_pc.html">Samsung ATIV Smart PC</a></TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">S Pen apps (S Note, S Memo, S Cloud), Quick Starter, AllShare Play</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">None</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/series/aspires7">Acer S7 series</a></TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Acer Ring, Acer Cloud, Acer Theft Shield</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Microsoft Office 2010 Trial, Microsoft Windows Live Essentials, Adobe Flash Player, Adobe Reader, newsXPresso, Cyberlink MediaEspresso, WildTangent Demo Games, Skype, McAfee Internet Security Suite trial, MyWinLocker</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://us.toshiba.com/computers/laptops/satellite/U920T/U925T-S2300/">Toshiba U925T-S2300</a></TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">TOSHIBA BookPlace&#0153;, TOSHIBA Disc Creator, TOSHIBA Maintenance Utility, TOSHIBA Media Player by sMedio Truelink+, TOSHIBA PC Health Monitor, TOSHIBA Recovery Disk Creator, TOSHIBA Resolution+&#174; Upconvert Plug-in for Media Player, TOSHIBA Service Station, TOSHIBA Sleep Utility, TOSHIBA Video Player, TOSHIBA eco Utility&#0153;</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Microsoft&#174; Windows&#0153; Essentials 2012, Microsoft&#174; Office (60-day Trial), Norton Internet Security&#0153; 2013 (30-day trial subscription), Norton&#0153; Laptop Checkup, SRS Premium Sound 3D&#174;, WildTangent&#174; Game Console</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/series/aspireu">Acer Aspire 7600U</a></TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">AcerCloud Docs, Acer Recovery Management, Acer Identity Card, Acer Live Update, Acer Accessory Store, Acer Initiatives, Acer Explorer, AcerCloud Portal</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Wild Tangent&#174;, clear.fi Media, clear.fi Photo, Cyberlink&#174; MediaEspresso, AIR Gesture, McAfee&#174; Internet Security Suite, Hotkey Utility, MyWinLocker Suite, Nero 12 Essentials, Amazon weblink, Gomaji (Taiwan only), Lovefilm&#174; web link, MyET, Spotify&#0153;, Evernote&#174;, Communication, Skype&#0153;, Kindle, News Xpresso, Txtr, Hulu, IVI.RU, Netflix, 7Digital, Spotify&#0153;, TuneIn, Amazon&#174;, eBay&#174;, Rakuten Gateway, Adera, Cut The Rope, Mahjong, Minesweeper, Pinball FX2, Shark Dash, Solitaire, Tap Tiles, Treasures of Montezuma III, Wild Tangent&#174;, Wordament, ChaCha&#174;, Crystal Eye, Encyclopaedia Britannica, iCookbook&#0153;, Merriam Webster, WeatherBug, StumbleUpon, Travel, Ctrip</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Dell <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-laptops#!facets=228279~0~14814753&p=1">Lattitude</a> / <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dell.com/us/p/xps-12-l221x/pd">XPS</a> models</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Windows 8 Getting Started Tile, My Dell & Dell Backup & Recovery, Dell Shop App</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Microsoft Office Trial (30-day), McAfee (Inspiron only), eBay (Inspiron only), Amazon Kindle, Amazon Taskbar App, eBay Desktop Icon (Inspiron only)</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/tech-specs/laptop/ideapad/yoga/yoga-13/">Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13</a> (consumer focus)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Lenovo Cloud Storage by SugarSync, Lenovo Companion, Lenovo Energy Management, Lenovo Motion Control, Lenovo Support Center, Lenovo Transition</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Accuweather, Amazon Kindle, Birzzle, Cyberlink YouCam, eBay, Evernote, Fishing Joy, Intelligent Touchpad, McAfee&#174; AntiVirus Plus, Microsoft&#174; Office 2010, OneKey&#174; Recovery, RaRa, Skype&#0153</TD></TR> <TR><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; "><a target="_blank" href="http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/tech-specs/laptop/thinkpad/thinkpad-twist/ ">Lenovo ThinkPad Twist</a> (business focus)</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">Lenovo Cloud Storage</TD><TD style="border:1px solid black; font-size:x-small; ">AccuWeather, Amazon Kindle, BlueStacks -- Android app player, Evernote, Expense Management, Fruit Ninja, Microsoft&#174; Office (trial), Rara -- Music, Skype&#0153</TD></TR> </TABLE> <P> <p>At least one conclusion is easy to draw from this: the less expensive machines, like Acer, have that much more third-party software pre-added as a way to offset the cost.</p><p>Aside from its touch-centric features, Microsoft has touted Windows 8 as being faster, leaner, more efficient, and more economical with power than any previous version of Windows. All of those selling points aren't likely to mean much to the owner of a brand-new Windows 8 machine when a dozen programs she doesn't even want to use are shoehorned into the machine at the factory.</p> <P> <p>Some of the performance issues created by bloatware are partly alleviated by hardware -- mainly, the presence of SSDs rather than mechanical disk drives in most new Windows 8 systems. The speed of those drives helps offset the performance problems created when a dozen different programs attempt to access the disk at the same time after bootup. But even those improvements only go so far.</p> <P> <p>Microsoft claims to hate junkware just as much of the rest of us, which is why (so it says) it introduced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/en_US/pd/productID.235559700">the Signature line of PCs</a> sold through its stores. Said PCs have no third-party software installed, and a panoply of vendors -- including all those listed above -- is represented in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/cat/categoryID.44066900">Microsoft's Signature store</a>. Plus, in a very Genius Bar-esque move, those who have existing PCs can bring them to a Microsoft Store and pay $99 to have them tuned to meet Signature standards.</p> <P> <p>Fine, except what Microsoft isn't as vocal about is the fact that Signature PCs can still come pre-loaded with Microsoft add-ons, such as Windows Live Essentials, trial editions of Microsoft Office, or Microsoft Security Essentials. In short, it's at least as much about Microsoft leveling the playing field against third-party competition as it is about providing end users with a clean, uncluttered PC experience.</p> <P> <p>PC buyers always want to pay as low a price as they can for the best possible PC, and PC manufacturers are more than happy to oblige. But the lowering of costs via the bulk supply discounts available to PC makers only goes so far, and the crapware strategy is a deeply-entrenched way to drop the per-unit price a few bucks further.</p> <P> <p>What's doubly ironic is that the "post-PC" devices -- the smartphones and tablets we're turning to as alternatives to lumbering desktop towers and full-blown notebooks -- are becoming just as infested with crapware too. Worse, such stuff is almost always unremovable, barring rooting the phone or other extreme measures. The one exception that comes to mind: Apple -- another reason it can charge premium prices for its devices.</p> <P> <p>Apart from paying extra and buying a Signature PC or a Mac, one workaround for a junk-infested PC is to simply take the time to de-install everything that isn't wanted, and then run a system-imaging utility to make a snapshot of everything at that point. If anything goes wrong, you can restore that image, minus the stuff you don't want. Some machines even include a system-imaging or backup tool that will partly automate this process, but be warned that many such tools simply consist of a utility that restores from a hidden partition -- which still includes all the stuff you don't want.</p> <P> <p>Uninstall is an area where Windows 8 makes things better: New Windows 8 apps from the Windows Store are required to have an easy and complete uninstall. Microsoft bragged about this at the Windows 8 launch. The same isn't true of older Windows apps, which they now refer to as "desktop apps." They use their older uninstall routines.</p> <P> <p>If the crapware habit has persisted this long, even into the Windows 8 age, it's hard to see it going away anytime soon. It's too lucrative a channel for the PC makers to abandon entirely. But that doesn't mean we have to take it lying down.</p>