Avaya, Samsung To Pitch VoIP, Other Products To Enterprises
In addition to integrating each other's technologies in mobile and VoIP communications, the partners will jointly develop a range of new voice and video products
Avaya Inc. and Samsung Electronics have inked a deal to jointly develop and market converged IP communications solutions to businesses.
In addition to integrating each others technologies, the partners will collaborate in the developments on a range of voice and video products, leveraging Avaya's strengths in Voice over IP (VoIP) and Samsung's position in the mobile communications market. Avaya boasts one million enterprise customers worldwide and, with $56.7 billion in sales last year, Samsung is one of the world's largest semiconductor and communications technology firms.
In the short term, however, the partnership will have the effect of raising Avaya's profile in the fast-growing Asia Pacific communications market. Under the agreement, Samsung's first step will be to market its partner's contact center and IP telephony solutions in Korea. Jointly-developed IP mobility and convergence products will be marketed as both individually and co-branded offerings.
"This agreement enables us to increase our global competitive advantage in IP communications and further strengthen our position in the Asia Pacific region," Avaya Chairman and CEO Donald K. Peterson said in a statement. "Our reputation for innovation and communications solutions that improve business operations will bring new advantages to Avaya and Samsung customers."
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?