Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Art Wittmann

Art Wittmann

Managing Director, InformationWeek Reports

Enterprise Buyers To Carriers: We're Not Thrilled

The 4G network is fast and mostly adequate for existing enterprise needs, but that's not stopping IT pros from worrying about future viability. Here's how providers and customers see the issues.

When our partners atLight Reading came to us with the idea of fielding almost identical surveys to users of enterprise services and carrier providers on the future of mobility, we were at once intrigued and skeptical. We knew InformationWeek's readers would be happy to tell us what they want from mobile services, but could Light Reading really get carriers to say where they're headed? Turns out it could and did.

The results from 230 IT professionals involved in determining, procuring, or managing mobile services and from 67 mobile carriers show huge gulfs between what users want and what carriers think they want--and can provide. (The full report will be available in mid-November at InformationWeek Reports)

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Surprisingly, very few carriers (9%) said they want to see data prices increase. The largest chunk (50%) would prefer to implement data caps to create a more manageable service. Some 21% said prices are too high, and 20% said they're at the right level. Not so surprisingly, data caps aren't popular with IT pros; 40% were OK with current prices but objected to data caps, and another 50% said prices are simply too high regardless of data caps.

When we asked IT pros how they feel about existing caps, 43% said they foresee problems and 37% said they already have had issues. Ninety percent of customers questioning pricing and 80% questioning limits on service don't indicate a happy user base--and data caps just make things worse.

If consumers hit such a cap, they can decide on the spot if they want to pony up more money for another chunk of data. But if corporate users hit a cap, they generally don't have permission to whip out the credit card for another 100 GB or so. And even if they did, Murphy's Law says you'll hit your data cap at the worst possible time, like when you're trying to book an order in front of a customer. The result is the need for fairly complex policies and usage monitoring that will come with their own costs.

For their part, carriers aren't just trying to drive more revenue--30% of respondents said they're trying to do just that, but another 47% said they want to provide better service and 23% want to reduce network congestion. Clearly, giving unlimited data doesn't mean there's an unlimited supply of bandwidth. At some point, something has to give.

Enterprise users expect that their employees will adopt tablets and smartphones somewhat faster than carriers do--though the differences in expected rate of growth are not by any means striking. What's more striking is the difference in opinion of the existing network. Roughly half of both carriers (47%) and enterprise customers (52%) said that 4G networks are adequate but need improvement. A quarter of IT pros said the current 4G network is "very good and meets our needs," while a much larger 40% of carriers said that. Some 20% of IT pros said the existing infrastructure is barely cutting it, while only 10% of carriers come to the same conclusion. This disparity seems like a formula for customer disappointment.

IT pros see two areas in particular where existing networks don't cut it. First, for rural/remote usage, where data coverage can be spotty to nonexistent--46% of survey respondents said this is their biggest issue. The second biggest concern, at 29%, is with data caps and avoiding excessive overage fees.

There's not much to be done about the first issue, but in the second case, both carriers and IT pros see Wi-Fi as an off-load medium and a way to expand network coverage. Only 12% of the carriers in our survey don't plan to use Wi-Fi this way; just 26% of IT pros said they preferred not to use Wi-Fi where they can to augment 4G services.

As carriers improve their mobile networks and enterprise users rely more heavily on apps that require wireless connectivity, how confident is each group that the 4G wireless infrastructure will do the job?

Not surprisingly, more carriers are "very confident" than are enterprise planners (38% vs. 15%). However, 70% of enterprise customers said they're at least somewhat confident, while 56% of carriers said the same. The rest--just 15% of enterprise pros and 6% of carrier pros--see a very bleak picture for carrier wireless networking.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.