Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Paul McDougall

Paul McDougall

Editor At Large, InformationWeek

HP Should Have Looked Inside IBM For CEO

Big Blue has a pool of enterprise-savvy CEOs-in-training. Any one of them would have been a been a more logical choice than Meg Whitman.

HP's decision to anoint Meg Whitman as CEO seems odd for a company that makes most of its money from business technology. Former eBay chief Whitman is a relentless consumer brand-builder--but that's not what HP needs. The board instead should have looked east to IBM, which has a pool of divisional heads who are running highly profitable commercial IT units that are bigger than most companies.

Even before Leo Apotheker arrived from SAP, HP as an organization had concluded that its consumer offerings, mostly printers and PCs, were commodity products with deteriorating margins, and little potential for long-term growth. That's why, under previous CEO Mark Hurd, it invested $13.9 billion to acquire tech services giant EDS, spent $2.35 billion on data storage specialist 3Par, and dropped another $2.7 billion to buyout 3Com.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

HP decided that future profits were to be found in the enterprise. That makes the decision to replace Apotheker, who outdoes Crocs when it comes to making flip flops ("We'll put WebOS on every PC! Er, no, let's drop WebOS, AND PCs!") an odd choice. Especially when you consider the CEOs-in-waiting toiling at IBM, a company that HP has been trying to emulate for the past decade.

An obvious choice might have be Ginny Rometty, who heads up global sales for IBM and previously led its key consulting unit. Rometty is a big picture type who can also talk details, and she's got the sales exec ability to connect with customers. It's no coincidence that current IBM CEO Sam Palmisano also came from sales. The New York Times reported that HP offered Rometty the top job prior to hiring Apotheker, and that she turned it down.

[ For more on what awaits Meg Whitman, see HP's Whitman Or Leo: It's The Strategy, Stupid. ]

Maybe by now she's had a change of heart, particularly given that Palmisano, 59, earlier this year said he would likely break with IBM tradition and not step down at age 60.

IBM insiders will tell you that when Palmisano does go, the candidates to replace him are pretty much limited to Rometty and services head Mike Daniels. Daniels runs what's arguably IBM's most important business unit.

Global Services accounted for half of the company's total revenue. And though it's been a bit growth-challenged of late, pre-tax income was a healthy $2.4 billion in the most recent quarter. Apotheker himself wanted to push HP deeper into services, he just wasn't the guy to do it. Daniels might have been.

Two other IBM'ers would also have been good choices, though not as compelling as Rometty or Daniels. Software head Steve Mills may be the smartest guy in the room at IBM, and he presides over a unit that grew 5.7% in the last fiscal year, despite the rough economy. Under his watch, IBM is becoming a powerhouse in high-growth software markets like business intelligence and Big Data analysis.

To my mind, however, Mills, savant that he is, is too much a specialist for the broad responsibilities that go with the corner office.

Another Big Blue exec who should have at least gotten a look from HP is Rod Adkins, who heads up the company's $18 billion server and storage business. Adkins is a smooth, convincing speaker who could sell a turnaround story to Wall Street and big customers. The knock against him would be that he's a hardware guy, at a time when HP is looking to emphasize software and services over nuts and bolts.

Still, any of the above probably would have been a better choice to run HP than Whitman, who's got broad experience in consumer brand-building, but little in the way of hard-core tech chops. Whitman only makes sense if HP wants to change course (again) and embrace consumer offerings like tablets and PCs.

So why didn't HP turn to IBM? It may be that the HP board felt such a move would be an admission that IBM, at this point in time, is a superior business.

Another factor may also have been in play. IBM has sued virtually every high-level executive that has jumped ship in the last couple of years--mostly in an attempt to enforce non-compete clauses. It served papers on M&A chief David Johnson when he left for Dell; on chip guru Mark Papermaster when he bolted for Apple; on biz continuity GM Joaane Olsen when she went to Oracle; on U.S. sales head Sam Khanna when he went to Unisys; and on cloud leader Giovanni Visentin when he left for HP itself.

In most of the cases, IBM either settled or a judge told the company to back off. Still, HP's board likely wanted a new CEO in place right away to keep it (and its stock) from sinking deeper. A lengthy court battle isn't what it needed.

Whitman's got her work cut out for and she may yet prove to be a great choice. But HP is betting an awful lot on it.

See the latest IT solutions at Interop New York. Learn to leverage business technology innovations--including cloud, virtualization, security, mobility, and data center advances--that cut costs, increase productivity, and drive business value. Save 25% on Flex and Conference Passes or get a Free Expo Pass with code CPFHNY25. It happens in New York City, Oct. 3-7, 2011. Register now.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.