Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Eric Zeman

3 Google Reader Changes Need Repair Now

Google stirred the ire of Google Reader users with its latest redesign, which ditches some of the RSS service's best features. Google must fix some missteps.

Aside from Google's Gmail service, the one Google product I rely on the most is Google Reader. It is an absolutely essential tool that I use every single day to stay abreast of all the information I need to effectively report on the mobile telecommunications industry. Reader has been unchanged by Google for so long that I've fine-tuned how and when I use the service to an art form. I've long considered myself a master of Google Reader's inner workings.

Now, I am a newb all over again, and I am ticked off about it. I'm not the only one complaining, either.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

First, Google gave Reader's general appearance a make-over. It now falls in-line with some of Google's other services that have seen make-overs of late, such as Gmail, Docs, and Calendar. They all match the general look of Google's Google+ social network, with a black bar running across the top, larger buttons, and more white space. I can get over these aesthetic changes. I don't necessarily like them, but I can deal.

Second, Google nixed one of Reader's neat features--the ability to subscribe to the feeds of other individuals and share posts back and forth. This social-networking-style feature was a critical reason I use Reader, and now it is gone.

Instead, Google wants everyone to share posts to Google+. While I totally get the thinking behind a move like this--if it can't increase Google+'s usership organically, why not force people to use it?--sacking the way it worked entirely is just not cool.

So, with these and other tweaks made by Google in mind, here are three critical things that Google need to fix right away.

1. Speed It Up

I don't know what the hell happened, but the new Google Reader is slower than a turtle stuck in a puddle of industrial-strength epoxy. Everything about it is slow. Feeds are slow to refresh, new items are slow to open, and pretty much every time I press a button I have to wait five to 30 seconds for something to happen.

Not cool, Google. You used to be all about speed, so where did this glacial-like performance come from?

2. Make It Actually Work As It Is Supposed To

I subscribe to about 115 different feeds in Reader. I generally plow through several thousand headlines per day. When I mark items as read, I need them to stay marked as read. When I star an item, I need it to remain starred. When I hit the refresh button, I actually expect Reader to refresh.

With the new Reader, all these actions are inconsistent. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't. At one point yesterday, I read through about 75 items before lunch. I read them one at a time, marking each "read" as I went. After lunch, I returned to Reader to see I had about 150 unread stories. I started digging in, only to find that half of them I'd already read before lunch and were suddenly marked unread again.

Not cool, Google. I don't have time like that to waste during the day. Make it work right.

3. Bring Back Shared Feeds

This is essential. There were several feeds that I subscribed to from individuals that were an absolutely vital part of my informational flow. Now, I no longer have access to those feeds. Instead, Google hopes that I'll watch those same people in Google+ to see what they share publicly. Only these were private feeds meant pretty much only for me. In the 36 hours or so that I've been using the new Reader, I've been unable to access these feeds or find alternatives that are as easy to use.

Not cool, Google. You've killed how I collect information from critical sources. Bring this feature back, immediately.

The bottom line here is that Google has messed up the performance and behavior of a business tool I use day in and day out to get my job done. The changes have had a drastic effect on my productivity.

That's just not acceptable.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.