Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Eric Zeman

iOS 6: Apple Headed For Design Rut?

iPhone 5's evolutionary hardware update may disappoint some, but the real problem lies with Apple's failure to improve iOS 6.

Along with the iPhone 5, Apple has unveiled the final version of iOS 6, which, for better or worse, looks exactly like iOS 1. Apple may have buried 200 new features in the latest rendition of its smartphone and tablet platform, but the operating system badly needs a visual and functional overhaul.

The basic user experience of iOS 6 is identical to every version of iOS before it. The home screen has little icons arranged in a grid. You can rearrange the icons, but not control them fully. You can have one home screen or many. The home button always takes you back to the main home screen. The fonts, the icons, the colors, and all the other design elements that go into the user interface have been tweaked over the years, but not changed in any dramatic fashion or function. Users have almost no control over them.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Don't misunderstand me. The new features in iOS 6 are great. What's not to like about synced browser tabs, email VIPs, PassBook for tickets, FaceTime over cellular, better Siri, and deep Facebook integration? All good stuff, though all also catch-up features compared to Android.

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, which Google unveiled in June, makes a number of visual and function changes when compared to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. Android 4.0 itself made dramatic changes when compared to Android 2.3 Gingerbread. Google has offered continual improvements of its operating system not only in terms of features, but in terms of home screen control and customization. Google does this to keep things fresh. Android 1.0 (released in 2008) looks ancient when held side-by-side with Android 4.1.

[ iPhone 5 delights on a device level, but has plenty of rivals to worry about. See Apple iPhone 5: Opportunities And Threats. ]

Windows Phone 8, due out later this year, will also offer a bit of a visual change when compared to Windows Phone 7.5 and Windows Phone 7. It offers a wider selection of Live Tile sizes, and lets users customize the home screen more fully. WP8 may not be a drastic redesign, but it goes a long way to improving the usefulness of home screen behavior and how users will interact with their devices. Compare Windows Phone 8 to any version of Windows Mobile (which Microsoft ceased developing in 2010), and Microsoft's efforts to modernize its OS are apparent.

BlackBerry 10, when it is released early next year, will be a completely new operating system. Everything about it will be different from the previous versions of BlackBerry OS. BlackBerry 7 was released just one year ago. BlackBerry 7 and BlackBerry 10 are wholly different.

The original iPhone, along with iOS 1, was released in June 2007. Here we are more than five years later and iOS appears mostly unchanged when compared to the original.

One might argue that you don't mess with success. The iPhone, after all, has been a huge success for Apple. The iPhone ecosystem generates more revenue for Apple than all of Microsoft's products combined do for Microsoft. It's a massive business, and with 400 million iOS devices out in the market, Apple clearly knows how to make a product that people are willing to buy.

What's worrisome is that Apple may get stuck in a design rut. Just look at OS X. It's been available for more than 10 years and looks almost the same as when it first debuted. Can iOS really remain (essentially) unchanged for that long? I don't think so. Google is innovating quickly. Microsoft and its OEMs are stepping up their game, too. In a few months, we'll have a clearer picture on how far RIM aims to take its redesign.

iOS 6 may be the best and most powerful version of iOS yet, but it still runs the risk of being boring.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.