Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Kevin Casey

Competition Cranks Up For Online Search Budgets

As Google, Microsoft's Bing, and Facebook place heavier emphasis on SMBs, advertisers stand to benefit with free and value-added services designed to attract and retain their online spending.

It's funny how coincidences of timing occur amongst competitors. Last October, for example, Google rolled out Boost--its largely automated local advertising engine for smaller businesses that don't want to manage their own keywords--in three test markets. Two days later, Microsoft announced that advertisers could run campaigns across both Bing and Yahoo from its unified adCenter site.

Just last week, Google began offering free phone support to its AdWords customers. On Monday, Microsoft rolled out the Bing Business Portal in beta. The service offers free Web pages for businesses and replaces the Bing Local Listing Center. AdWords and Bing Business Portal are not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison--the latter has more in common with other free online real estate such as Google Places or Facebook Pages. But they do share a common target: Small businesses, which have become the grand prize in the ongoing duel for search dominance.

The move to offer phone support for AdWords was made specifically with small business customers in mind, according to Deepak Khandelwal, vice president of advertiser operations at Google. "Small business is a key area for us and will continue to be a high-growth area for us," said Khandelwal in an interview. "We'll continue to invest in that area."

There's a similar message coming out of Redmond. "The small business advertising market is important to Microsoft," a company spokesperson wrote in an email. While noting that the beta version of the Bing Business Portal doesn't currently offer adCenter services, the spokesperson added: "Bing Business Portal and Microsoft adCenter are committed to helping businesses build customer volume, and will look for opportunities to integrate our services more closely in the future."

The upshot--and potential upside--for small or midsize companies is that the major players are starting to work harder to earn and keep SMB's online advertising business. They don't have much choice: While Google remains the leader in search, recent data indicate the unified Bing-Yahoo platform is gaining ground. The latest Experian Hitwise numbers show Google accounted for upwards of 64% of Web searches in March, while the combined Bing-Yahoo made up about 30%. That's still a nice lead for Google, but it marks a three-point decline in the company's search share from February, with Bing-powered searches adding 5% to their portion of the market. And then there's Facebook looming large on the horizon. The company's categorization as the social network usually excludes them from search standings like those kept by Experian Hitwise, but that doesn't mean Facebook isn't also taking dead aim at small business ad budgets. Research firm eMarketer recently estimated Facebook's 2011 online advertising haul would exceed $2 billion in the U.S., and twice that amount worldwide. Like Google and Microsoft, Facebook appears to be more actively seeking out small business marketers: They were recently a key partner in American Express's Small Business Saturday campaign, for example, serving up $1 million in free ads to participating businesses--which was really just seven-figure ad buy of its own, intended for a very specific audience.

While Google's addition of phone support for AdWords might at first seem unremarkable in terms of adding value, it signals a recognition that smaller businesses need to see a meaningful return on their paid search investment, even more so than their big business counterparts. Otherwise, they're not going to keep buying up keywords--they can't afford to. If a small business earmarks, say, $10,000 for online advertising--and has to stretch that for its entire fiscal year--that doesn't leave much margin for error.

Microsoft's adCenter has its own, slightly different version of live phone help called QuickLaunch, which it offers to advertisers who commit to spending at least $500 per month. QuickLaunch, though, is a one-time deal--once an advertiser completes the program, they have to take the reins with adCenter's self-service tools. Facebook leans heavily on self-help channels, though its Ads Team page reads: "Some advertising accounts may be eligible for a dedicated account manager." My take: Most smaller advertisers don't spend enough to qualify. The AdWords phone line appears to be the first that offers ongoing consulting to any current advertiser--essentially functioning as an outsourced online ad agency for small businesses that don't have the in-house resources.

"[Small businesses] do often need a little bit more support than some of the larger clients," Google's Khandelwal said, noting that AdWords phone support goes beyond things like forgotten passwords to include consulting in areas such as initial account set-up and ongoing campaign performance. "AdWords is a great product, but it does take some time to get used to and build expertise."

With truly free services such as Bing Business Portal, Google Places, or Facebook Pages, the question for smaller businesses is usually: Why not? There's not much risk in claiming a listing on any or all of them. Value-added services such as person-to-person consulting, on the other hand, are geared more toward answering a pared-down version of the same question: Why? As in: Why should a small business spend the money?

As the search giants--and the broader online advertising industry--endeavor to come up with good answers to that question, it's safe to expect that various launches and enhancements will continue to carry the airs of "Whatever you can do, I can do better." So be it. If it means better results for your online dollars, you win--regardless of who ultimately trumps the search game.




Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.