Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Doug Henschen

Doug Henschen

Executive Editor, InformationWeek

ParAccel Jumps On Analytics Bandwagon

In-database processing highlights an upgrade that also will include workload management and availability improvements.

Pursuing the well-established trend toward in-database analytic processing, ParAccel is introducing an upgrade that will broaden the types of analytics that can be handled inside its column-store database.

Announced November 17, ParAccel Database 3.0 (PADB 3.0) will mark the vendor's first stab at in-database processing for analytics that aren't expressed in standard SQL. Integration will be achieved through new table functions that can feed and receive results to and from third-party and custom algorithms written in languages such as C and C++.

To get a running start in new analytic areas, ParAccel has partnered with Fuzzy Logix, a vendor that offers an extensive library of descriptive statistics, Monte Carlo simulations and pattern-recognition functions. The table functions approach also will support MapReduce techniques, more than 700 analyses commonly used by financial services, and custom algorithms, according to ParAccel.

"Whether it's fuzzy matching, geospatial analysis or credit-risk pricing, these are things that many customers have written in C or C++ that can now be integrated directly into our database," said Tarun Loomba, ParAccel's chief marketing officer.

In-database processing moves data-intensive analyses inside powerful, parallel-processing data warehousing environments. The idea is to handle the analyses where the data resides rather than pulling massive data sets out of the warehouse and processing on the comparatively slow servers that typically run analytic packages and non-SQL algorithms.

The difference in performance between conventional and in-database approaches is usually dramatic. Queries that would otherwise take days might take minutes while those that formerly took hours might take seconds.

Teradata, Netezza (now a part of IBM) and Aster Data have led the in-database trend in recent years. All three of these vendors have partnered with SAS to bring that leading analytics vendor's procedures into their databases. ParAccel has yet to win a partnership with SAS, but that's not a relationship that's quickly or easily won. Data warehousing vendors usually start with smaller analytics vendors such as Fuzzy Logix, a company that already has partnerships in place with Aster Data, Microsoft, Netezza and Sybase.

ParAccel is also catching up on connections to alternative databases. Lots of data warehousing vendors have struck up partnerships with Cloudera to integrate with its distribution of open-source Hadoop. The parallel processing environment supports analyses of inconsistent data and loosely structured content such as e-mail messages and social network comments. ParAccel plans to add an integration with Hadoop, according to Loomba, but he did not specify whether it would be in partnership with Cloudera.

Other improvements promised in PADB 3.0 include workload management features that favor short queries over batch jobs. This will give interactive BI users short response times even if big jobs are running in the background. The upgrade will also improve uptime by eliminating restarts in the event of disk failures.

Set for release in December, PADB 3.0 will start at $50,000 per CPU. The database runs on suggested configurations of hardware from leading vendors including HP and Dell.



Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.