Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Dave Methvin

Skype: Three Ways Microsoft Can Blow It

Microsoft's massive acquisition of Skype will end in failure if they try any of these strategies.

Microsoft's stunning $8.5 billion offer for Skype has the industry talking. Just as they got out from under the consent decree imposed by the U.S. Department of Justice as a settlement for antitrust practices, Microsoft made its biggest acquisition play ever.

Microsoft has no shortage of cash at the moment, so perhaps this will be the beginning of a huge buying spree in Redmond. The Microsoft of a decade ago dominated the industry, but today's Microsoft has been playing catch-up to companies like Apple and Google that are flying high, particularly in the mobile market. Developing new products from scratch takes time, and time isn't on Microsoft's side. Yet buying your way into a market isn't a sure path to success either, and it can be expensive.

Considering that eBay sold Skype to an investment company back in 2009 for less than $2 billion, Microsoft's offer is quite a return on its investment. Microsoft should have bought Skype back in 2009, eh? Skype's investors may have the DOJ restrictions to thank for their multi-billion-dollar windfall. Despite the high price tag, there's no guarantee that this deal will be good for Microsoft. In the business world, the story plays out again and again: When a big fish swallows a little fish, the big fish gets heartburn.

Microsoft's offer for VOIP-leader Skype has much of the industry wondering exactly what the company is planning to do with its fresh catch. Clearly Microsoft must have some grand plans for Skype that justify a stratospheric price tag like that. Let's face it though, a lot of the speculation revolves around how this will be the death of Skype. Who knows, perhaps those speculators are right, but if so, exactly what will go wrong? I can think of a few things that Microsoft could do that would almost guarantee failure.

Bonehead strategy 1: Abandon the other mobile Skype clients. No doubt, Microsoft will want to have a great Windows Phone 7 Skype client. That doesn't change the fact that today, the iPhone, Android, and BlackBerry dominate the mobile world. So if Microsoft wants to remain relevant in today's mobile market, they need to make a competitive Skype client for those platforms. It's the same reason that Willie Sutton supposedly robbed banks: "Because that's where the money is."

It's not as if Skype has great mobile clients at the moment, either, at least on Android. When I installed the Skype client on my Android phone, it caused several quirky behaviors and seemed to drain battery life faster as well. It also wasn't a good sign that Skype was the largest application installed on the phone by a factor of two. Clearly Skype (or Microsoft) has a lot of work to do in improving the quality of its software.

Bonehead strategy 2: Make Skype work only in the Microsoft world: This is the carried-to-extremes extension of Strategy 1 outlined above. Microsoft's own statement said: "Skype will support Microsoft devices like Xbox and Kinect, Windows Phone, and a wide array of Windows devices, and Microsoft will connect Skype users with Lync, Outlook, Xbox Live, and other communities. Microsoft will continue to invest in and support Skype clients on non-Microsoft platforms."

It makes perfect sense to integrate Skype functionality into those Microsoft products, particularly since Skype provides connections into the existing telephone network that Microsoft lacks with its existing voice offerings such as Messenger and Lync. But if Microsoft kills the Skype client and makes everyone use Windows Phone, Messenger, and Xbox for voice, it will be the death of what we know as Skype. It's one thing to make the software work best on Windows, but it's another thing entirely to deny support to other platforms. Not everyone believes Microsoft when it comes to supporting non-Microsoft platforms, including InformationWeek's own Paul McDougall, and it's hard to blame them. But there are past cases, such as Microsoft's support of Office on the Apple platform, that could give an optimist hope.

Bonehead strategy 3: Bend to the will of cellphone carriers. With its ability to provide both voice and messaging, Skype is a threat to the profits of cellphone carriers. A Microsoft-owned Skype has a different set of priorities. For one, Microsoft is a player against Apple and Google in the phone market. The carriers may "ask" Microsoft to change or cripple the product in order to preserve their own profits in voice, messaging, or data. Microsoft may be inclined to comply if it can get more favorable marketing for Windows Phone products by the carriers. None of that would be good for consumers, and I would say it could be just as disastrous for Skype's future as well.

Skype's lead could evaporate quickly if Microsoft makes the wrong moves. The heat source is most likely to be Microsoft's familiar nemesis, Google. Although some analysts say that Microsoft bought Skype to keep it out of Google's hands, I tend to agree with others that there was no good reason for Google to want Skype. Especially at these prices.

Google already has its own Google Voice service, based off its acquisition of GrandCentral back in 2009. In addition to the PC-based VOIP service, it integrates with both cellphones and landlines and offers features like simultaneous ring and voice transcription to SMS or email. Google Voice already offers more services than Skype and is a very well-built offering, but it doesn't have Skype's large user base. If Microsoft follows one or more of the strategies outlined above, they can solve that problem for Google.


Attend Enterprise 2.0 Boston to see the latest social business tools and technologies. Register with code CPBJEB03 and save $100 off conference passes or for a free expo pass. It happens June 20-23. Find out more.



Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.