Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Jacob Morgan

The Collaborative Organization: Control The Center



(Page 3 of 5)

Try asking them the following questions:

-- What is it about this initiative that you are against?

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

-- Do you believe employee collaboration is important?

-- Do you see any areas of improvement around collaboration and communication that you think we can turn into opportunities?

-- What would make you feel more comfortable with moving in the direction of collaboration?

-- If you were leading this organization, what would you do to help foster collaboration?

Asking these questions will allow you to understand where an employee who shows this resistance is coming from and why. This isn't about steamrolling employees, so make sure to pay attention to feedback.

Of course, not every organization is going to have the type of collaboration team described above. In fact, I have found that no two organizations have the exact same team or the same number of people participating to make these initiatives successful.


In your company, where does the push for Enterprise 2.0 come from?

The Next Question to Ask Is How to Get These People Involved in the Initiative

Getting employees involved doesn't need to be complicated. In fact, it starts by just asking them.

I have found that discussions about deploying these solutions are not uncommon within organizations. In fact, it's quite the opposite; they are common. The way to start is by looking at who else in the organization is having these conversations and discussions. I'd be surprised if there weren't teams at your company that haven't already deployed their own emergent collaboration technologies, such as wikis, microblogs, blogs, or other easily deployed platforms. After all, there are many free and low-cost alternatives that take a minimal amount of time to get up and running. Figure 5.2 shows that in 23% of all organizations the push for Enterprise 2.0 comes from the bottom up, which means that it's likely these tools are already being used in teams, groups, and departments. Keep in mind that these discussions aren't typically about emergent collaboration as a topic but instead are about business problems that employees are faced with. Emergent collaboration then becomes a potential solution to existing business problems.

You might encourage some of your colleagues to share their stories and experiences with you so that you can document them and share them with management. Surveys, as mentioned a few times in this book, are also effective ways to identify the collaboration problems employees are experiencing.

Many executives and employees do not like to address the elephant in the room. Because of this, many people in the organization are aware that a problem with collaboration exists but choose not to address it. This will work for only so long, and eventually it has to be addressed.

Is it more effective to have the push for Enterprise 2.0 come from the top down or from the bottom up? In the Chess Media Group survey we found that the greatest push for Enterprise 2.0 came from both the top down and the bottom up with a clear and driven purpose.

We can also see that "both and accidental" is the second largest type of push for Enterprise 2.0. This means that in 55% of all deployments the push came from the bottom and from the top. What does this tell us? Clearly, this is something that is being considered by most employees at an organization, and so the first step is to not be scared of having that conversation. If we include the "top down" numbers as well, senior management is involved in the push for Enterprise 2.0 in 72% of all deployments.

There is no template or cookie-cutter approach to getting people involved, but you should remember that based on the Chess Media Group survey, the chances of other executives and employees already having had these discussions is very high. Here are some things organizations have done to get support for these initiatives:

-- Conducting employee surveys that clearly show that collaboration and/or communication is an area that employees would like to see improved.

-- Developing and presenting a set of business use cases that other employees can relate to. This can be quite simple: Go out and deploy something for a small team and then show the value of what was done.

-- Highlighting case studies and examples of what other companies are doing. If you can find competitors or vertically relevant companies, that's even better.

-- Communicating the value of this for the employees. For example, you can go to an executive and say, "Remember how you keep mentioning that the executive team doesn't have enough insight into the ground level of our organization? Well, I think I found a way to fix this problem."

"How do we get people involved?" is a tricky question to provide a definitive answer to because it's a bit like asking, "How do I make friends?" Sure, there are some things you can do, such as not being rude and being open-minded. However, friendship happens when people click, and that is much more of a personality and personal connection factor than it is a "what can I do" factor. Although the things mentioned above can help get people involved, it is also going to depend on things such as timing, whether the people you are approaching like you and trust you, and whether you can connect and communicate with those people.

"What’s in it for me?" is an important question to address for those who might potentially be involved. Unfortunately, in many companies it is rare for employees to play an integral role in something that has the potential to change the culture and the way the business operates radically. This serves as a new and exciting opportunity for employees to challenge themselves and become part of something that can change the direction of the entire company. Most of the employees at companies whom I have interviewed were excited to be a part of something new while learning new skills. Employees who are passionate about emergent collaboration and believe in connecting employees together are the best people to have on this team.

« Previous Page | 12 3 | 45  | Next Page »


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.