Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


InformationWeek 500 Trends: Web 2.0, Globalization, Virtualization, And More

What the InformationWeek 500 data tells us about the use of emerging technologies.

You gotta try it; everyone's doing it.

That's how it feels sometimes with business technology, where the buzz around a new idea (virtualization, social networking, cloud computing) can get so loud it leaves a CIO wondering (and perhaps a CEO asking), "Are we the only ones not doing this yet?" At times like this, it's good to have 500 innovative friends to be able to ask about their strategies.

That's what our InformationWeek 500 delivers, as we ask companies detailed questions about what's going on in their technology organizations so that we can produce our ranking of the most innovative ones. We're intrigued by the huge range of strategies companies use to excel. Web 2.0 is one of the trendiest ideas in tech, for instance, but there are entire industries where not one company in our survey cites it as a top productivity improver. Meantime, adoption of some more tactical technologies, such as WAN optimization, has exploded in the last year.

The InformationWeek 500 research shows there's no one route to innovation. Nevertheless, when it comes to critical trends, from Web 2.0 to globalization to virtualization, it's wise to keep an eye on what others are up to. Here's a glimpse.

WEB 2.0 PAYOFF STILL HAZY
There's only one conclusion to draw about Web 2.0: Companies are playing it safe.

DIG DEEPER
MORE DATA AND ANALYSIS
For the complete data from our InformationWeek 500 research, download this
InformationWeek Analytics
Report
,
free for a limited time.

When it comes to using Web 2.0 collaboration tools, the momentum is behind wikis, blogs, and social networking, though primarily among co-workers. Some 70% of InformationWeek 500 companies say their employees are using those tools this year, compared with 55% last year. Using wikis and blogs internally is a much easier move, in terms of technology and compliance, than using them with outsiders, and that's reflected in the research--just over a third of companies use them with customers or others outside the company.

Use of hosted collaboration applications--from calendars to document sharing--hit a reasonably high 60%. (We didn't ask about hosted last year.) In all other Web 2.0 categories, usage is up but still relatively small. The integration of search into Web sites and apps has stalled: Like last year, six in 10 companies are doing it.

The extent of Web 2.0 technologies varies notably by industry. Asked what technologies have improved productivity the most, only 14% overall cite "encouraging the use of Web 2.0 technologies." However, more than a fourth of companies in consulting, electronics, IT, and telecom cite it as effective, while no companies do in automotive, chemicals, construction, or general retail.

It's proving hard for companies to wring results from Web 2.0. No industry in our survey has more than a third of companies citing Web 2.0 as one of the most effective productivity tools. The consultants at McKinsey recently found similar lukewarm results in their Web 2.0 research: 21% of 1,477 respondents are satisfied overall with Web 2.0 tools, while 22% are dissatisfied. One possible bright spot in our survey is that implementing new collaboration tools, such as Microsoft SharePoint, is cited more often than any other--48%--as a technology leveraged to improve productivity. It's possible some put Web 2.0 efforts, such as wikis and blogs, into that category.

One of the big Web 2.0 questions is what role IT should play. McKinsey's study concludes that, at satisfied companies, business units rather than IT departments are much more likely to drive the selection of Web 2.0 technologies. At companies dissatisfied with Web 2.0, IT is more likely to take the lead.

chart: Which new technologies are you adopting?
Despite corporate IT's reputation as Internet killjoys, our survey suggests a good number of IT organizations aren't fighting the Web 2.0 tide. Forty-six percent of companies discourage use of unapproved consumer applications. This actually suggests a pretty liberal attitude--not even half have a policy of actively discouraging their use. Given the regulatory need to do so in industries like banking, that's a pretty hands-off mentality. And 30% encourage use of consumer-oriented tools employees find useful.

There's more to Web 2.0 than collaboration tools like wikis and other employee-facing tools, and there's interesting progress on the critical back-end layer that enables Web 2.0. One is mashups; 38% of InformationWeek 500 companies are combining Web and enterprise content in new ways. The other is in Web 2.0 development tools. Sixty-three percent now have them in limited deployment, while 24% have them widely deployed in their IT departments. Last year we asked a narrower question, about Ajax development tools, but it offers some comparison: 45% were in limited deployment, and 9% widespread.

Web 2.0 might be an old term to your ears, but it's still got a long way to go before it makes a major impact on most companies, which are finding it difficult to get big-bang returns. While 51% of the top 100 companies in the InformationWeek 500 use wikis and blogs to communicate with customers and other outsiders, just 31% of the next 400 do.

 1 | 23  | Next Page »


Related Links

Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.