Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


DARPA Takes Aim At Space Junk

Defense research agency seeks partners to help it repair and reuse retired satellites.

Military Drones Present And Future: Visual Tour
Military Drones Present And Future: Visual Tour
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency seeks help solving new technical challenges in an existing program aimed at refurbishing satellites that are already in orbit.

DARPA's Phoenix program is exploring the feasibility of harvesting components from retired satellites, sometimes called space junk, and reusing them. The agency will hold a conference on Feb. 8 in conjunction with a formal announcement of the five technical challenge areas.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The program aims to "improve the economics and lower the cost of space systems," said program manager David Barnhart. "If you have the ability to use what is up there, you might be able to do it at lower cost."

There are three scenarios in development, each requiring new technologies, he said. One is the ability to use the hardware already on retired satellites, such as antennas and solar arrays. A robotic "mechanic," or servicer/tender, would be launched that's capable of retrieving components from retired satellites. That requires new tools that can grasp antennas and cut them from their booms; non-mechanical adhesives that can wrap around and attach components; and micro-cameras able to withstand the hostile environment.

A second scenario involves adding technology to active satellites as a way of lowering maintenance costs or improving performance. A third is the prospect of assembling satellites in space using a combination of salvaged components and new parts.

[ Government 2.0 requires throwing out outdated processes and adopting new models of success. See We Must Run Government IT Like A Startup. ]

The Phoenix program is also assessing the development of small "satlets" that piggyback on commercial satellite launches so they can be retrieved by the in-orbit mechanic. The satlets could carry special tools or comprise components that add capability or be combined to create new satellites.

There's a potential cost-benefit tradeoff with satlets. "The smaller the size, the less benefit you might get," Barnhart said. Ultimately, cost will be a determining factor. "The fundamental precept is cost," he said. "That's the absolute bottom line."

Five technical areas will be discussed at the upcoming Phoenix event. One is the need for a "proximity awareness" system to keep the robotic tender from bumping into other objects. Also needed are rendezvous proximity sensors to both track down retired assets to be salvaged and retrieve the payload orbital delivery systems (PODS) that carry satlets on commercial launches. Another area of discussion will be the possibility of increased efficiencies and lower costs during risk-reduction testing by coordinating the work of small companies.

The two other topics on the conference agenda are development of a "virtual ground station" capability and working with satellite providers to host and transport PODS.

There are roughly 1,300 space objects in geosynchronous orbit, some 22,000 miles above the Earth, Barnhart said. Of those, there are about 500 active and 500 retired satellites, and the remaining are debris and rocket bodies. Not all of those satellites are owned and operated by the federal government or U.S.-based companies. "We're making sure that whatever we [build] can go up to any retired satellite, with permission," Barnhart said. "We have to go through the appropriate permissive steps with the owners."

An initial demonstration, slated for 2015, will test to see if an antenna can be repurposed. "The antenna was chosen because that closes the link to the ground for communications," Barnhart said. As part of that demo, DARPA plans to use satlets to carry parts into orbit to make the antenna operable.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.