Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Federal Agencies Devise Shared Services Plans

The Office of Management and Budget is requiring federal agencies to tap into a more efficient IT delivery model.

InformationWeek Government - June 11, 2012
InformationWeek Green
Download the entire June 2012 issue of InformationWeek Government, distributed in an all-digital format as part of our Green Initiative
(Registration required.)

The Shared Services Mandate

In early May, federal CIO Steven VanRoekel launched an ambitious government-wide initiative--the Federal IT Shared Services Strategy--to address Uncle Sam's two biggest tech challenges: tight funding and outdated tools. The strategy aims to help agencies reduce what they spend on redundant IT systems and services and plow that money back into new technologies and tech-enabled innovations.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

"We need to push across the federal government, look at opportunities where there's rampant duplication, and maniacally go in and strip those down into single instances," VanRoekel said at InformationWeek's Government IT Leadership Forum in Washington on May 3, one day after the release of the Shared Services Strategy. "That will give us investment capital to innovate, to spend on mission, to pour back into the system, and free up people to put them on more important tasks."

The opportunities for efficiency and economies of scale are huge. The feds spend close to $80 billion annually on IT, and the Office of Management and Budget, in a review of 7,000 federal IT projects, discovered "many redundancies and billions of dollars in potential savings." In the area of supply chain management, for example, the OMB identified 759 planned projects valued at $3.3 billion.

The Shared Services Strategy fits under the umbrella of a concept called "shared first" that VanRoekel introduced last October, just two months after succeeding Vivek Kundra as federal CIO. VanRoekel wants agency CIOs to break out of the old habit of deploying software and servers every time they have a new requirement and instead make increased use of shared IT platforms. The OMB's goals include improving return on investment, boosting the productivity of federal workers and agencies, and increasing communications and collaboration among service providers, customers, and other stakeholders.

VanRoekel had signaled that the government would be moving in this direction. Even before the formal strategy was released in May, agencies were asked to identify at least two services per agency to consolidate. The published strategy goes a step further by requiring agencies to provide the OMB with their specific consolidation plans by August and to move two services to a shared environment by the end of this year.

The OMB defines a shared service as "an IT function that is provided for consumption by multiple organizations within or between federal agencies," and it groups them into three buckets: commodity IT (e.g., content management, infrastructure, email), support IT (HR, records management), and mission IT (geospatial, Federal Health Architecture).

The Shared Services Strategy focuses initially on commodity IT and recommends cloud services as a means to that end. While the OMB sees the potential for sharing IT services across agencies, VanRoekel said the immediate payoff will come from doing so within agencies. "Our lowest-hanging fruit is optimizing an agency by itself," VanRoekel said. "We can save billions of dollars by just going in and getting these agencies tuned."

Email will be a natural starting point. VanRoekel offers the example of the Department of Agriculture, which replaced 21 email systems with a single cloud-based email service from Microsoft for its 120,000 employees and contractors. In doing so, the USDA says it reduced its email costs from $24 per mailbox to $8 per mailbox.

To read the rest of the article,
Download the June 2012 issue of InformationWeek Government

The New Threat Landscape

Our full report on federal government cybersecurity is available free with registration.

This report includes 26 pages of action-oriented analysis, packed with 15 charts. What you'll find:
  • The most significant challenges to federal IT security
  • How prepared federal IT pros are for new security threats
Get This And All Our Reports




Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.