Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Congress Kills Cybersecurity Bill, White House Action Expected

White House looks primed to take action on its own after Congress again fails to pass cybersecurity legislation.

IW500: 15 Top Government Tech Innovators
IW500: 15 Top Government Tech Innovators
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Comprehensive cybersecurity regulatory reform failed yet again in the Senate on Thursday, but the White House is not waiting for Congress to act and will likely use an executive order to carry out some elements of the bill.

On Wednesday, Senate Republicans -- joined by a small group of Democrats -- again blocked the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 from coming to the Senate floor. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., attributed the opposition to a fast-tracked process and the failure to allow fully open amendments. Numerous national security officials have urged the bill's passage, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has repeatedly voiced strong opposition.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

In response to the bill's failure, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the bill "dead for this Congress."

In a statement, Reid said: "A bill that was and is most important to national security was just killed and that's cybersecurity. I hope President Obama uses all the authority of the executive branch at his disposal to fully protect our nation from the cyber security threat."

The administration has already taken some actions. According to reports, President Obama in mid-October signed the classified Presidential Policy Directive 20, which sets new cyber defense standards for government agencies, including standards for defensive measures that might require agencies to reach outside their own networks.

The Obama administration has also prepared a draft executive order, which has been circulating for months, that would require additional steps to be taken. Now, it appears prepared to issue that order.

"Congressional inaction in light of the risks to our nation may require the administration to issue an executive order as a precursor to the updated laws we need," White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Michael Daniel said in a statement. "We think the risk is too great for the Administration not to act."

A draft version of the executive order would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology to set cybersecurity standards for eighteen critical infrastructure industries. The Department of Homeland Security would encourage adoption of these standards, and agencies responsible for regulating critical infrastructure industries would be responsible for proposing potentially mandatory cybersecurity regulations for those industries.

Information sharing is another big piece of the draft order. The executive order would set up new information sharing mechanisms that will accelerate security clearances and limit use of proprietary information. The order would also require agencies to take appropriate steps to ensure privacy of shared information.

However, an executive order can't do it all. Despite urging the President to take action, Reid warned in a statement that an executive order "leaves much to be desired" because, for example, it cannot offer companies liability protection in the event of a cyber attack.

Whlie Reid declared the cybersecurity legislation dead for this Congress, McConnell said in a statement after the bill's failure that he hopes Congress will again take up the issue "sometime in December" after dealing with other important national security legislation.

Whatever the case, the persistence of the cyber threat is one reason that action may be needed soon. The annual report of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, released on Wednesday, found that China in particular -- which the report called "the most threatening actor in cyberspace" -- continues to represent a serious and "increasingly potent" concern for companies and government agencies that hold potentially sensitive data.

"U.S. industry and a range of government and military targets face repeated exploitation attempts by Chinese hackers," the report said, fingering China in cyber espionage and cyber attacks aimed at the Department of Defense, NASA and U.S.-based companies like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. In what the report called the "most significant example of malicious Chinese cyber activity," the report said that intruders "gained full functional control over networks at the [NASA] Jet Propulsion Laboratory."

The report noted that China continues to build up its cyber forces. "The Chinese military is refining and implementing strategies for the cyber domain," the report says, noting that the military and intelligence communities each have groups concentrating on cyber war and cyber espionage. "New developments suggest Chinese exploitation capabilities are improving significantly."

The report also noted that while American businesses are not necessarily able to "sufficiently manage the threat of Chinese cyber espionage" on their own, they remain afraid of sharing information about attacks with the government. Such concerns about sharing -- and about cyber attacks -- could be allayed by the President's forthcoming cyber executive order or by some sort of action on Capitol Hill. Just when the latter will come remains, at this point, anyone's guess.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.