Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Cybersecurity Executive Order Leaves Tough Work Undone

Government and industry must work together in challenging new ways to implement the White House's executive order on cybersecurity, top federal officials said Wednesday.

Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts
Who Is Hacking U.S. Banks? 8 Facts
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
It will require a lot of hard work and extensive new public-private collaboration to improve the nation's cybersecurity posture, key federal officials repeatedly stressed Wednesday in their first public remarks since the release of the White House's executive order on cybersecurity.

"Cybersecurity must be a shared, collective endeavor," White House cybersecurity coordinator Michael Daniel said before a packed crowd of officials and industry executives at a Department of Commerce event Wednesday morning, adding that success in implementing the order will depend on the government "forging new relationships" among agencies and with the private sector.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The new executive order unveiled late Tuesday sets up and expands public-private cybersecurity threat information sharing initiatives and creates a process for building a framework of voluntary cybersecurity standards for critical infrastructure companies.

[ Will budget cuts derail cybersecurity plans? Read Federal CIO Details Concerns On Looming Budget Cuts. ]

"The American people deserve nothing less than a whole-of-government approach," said Rebecca Blank, deputy secretary of the Department of Commerce, adding that "the government cannot do this alone."

According to Daniel, the cybersecurity executive order itself is the product of extensive outreach by the White House. "An enormous number of stakeholders' views are incorporated into the executive order," he said.

The Department of Homeland Security has the job of creating a task force to keep stakeholders at the table and over the next several weeks agencies tasked with implementing the executive order will hold an additional series of meetings with trade associations, other agencies and sector coordinating councils to discuss next steps. Among the first tasks will be to identify critical infrastructure entities nationwide, senior DHS cybersecurity official Bruce McConnell told InformationWeek.

"The systems that we depend on are overwhelmingly owned and operated by industry," added National Security Agency director and U.S. Cyber Command commander Gen. Keith Alexander. "We need to make sure private sector companies have the information they need to protect their networks and have that information in a timely manner."

That will require sharing among private sector entities and with government as well as government to private sector sharing, Alexander added, saying that the government often suffers from "blind spots" that prevent Cyber Command and others from knowing what they need to know to better defend the nation against cyber attacks.

According to McConnell, companies from various industries are already expressing interest in the Enhanced Cybersecurity Services program, which grew out of the defense industry-specific Defense Industrial Base pilot.

However, McConnell added, work still needs to be done to determine further incentives to spark interest and participation in both information sharing and adoption of voluntary cybersecurity standards that the executive order would establish. Part of that challenge will come from understanding the disparate needs of the different critical infrastructure sectors, Alexander said.

In addition to information, the other collaborative piece to the executive order will be the development and establishment of voluntary and possibly in some cases mandatory cybersecurity standards for critical infrastructure entities.

DHS and the National Institute of Standards and Technology will work closely together with industry to develop a framework for these standards, one that DHS deputy secretary Jane Lute said will be "outcome-based and technology neutral." According to Lute, DHS has already begun dialogs on these standards between the electricity sector and the Department of Energy and the financial sector and the Department of Treasury, among others.

In remarks at the event and an in interview with InformationWeek afterwards, NIST director Patrick Gallagher sketched out the yet-to-be developed framework a bit more. "The framework [will be a] series of practices, standards, guidance, methods, methodologies, whatever it takes that if implemented would create a desired level of resilience and cybersecurity effectiveness," he said. "The framework will include both broad principles and methods, common practices and tools, specific and sometimes sector-specific practices."

Gallagher was quick to say that while NIST will coordinate the development of the framework, the private sector will play a lead role. "This is not a NIST framework," he said. "This framework will also belong to industry. What we are trying to create is an aligned effort." NIST has already posted a number of questions on its website that it intends to ask in a forthcoming request for information seeking industry input on the framework.

While officials Wednesday stressed the need for collaboration throughout the implementation process, a number of them also said that the executive order alone is insufficient. Both Daniel and Alexander, among others, urged Congress to pass bipartisan legislation to fill in gaps in the executive order.

One unanswered question is how and when that legislation will come together and make it to the President's desk in a form that the Obama Administration is willing to sign. Even Alexander, who has numerous times told Congress that cyber legislation is needed, admitted Wednesday that agreement on legislation is "challenging" due to differences in philosophies on the proper role of government in the cyber space.

With implementation months away, and officials continuing to push for legislation, what's clear is that much more needs to be done to put in place robust processes for government and industry to work together to improve the nation's cybersecurity. The executive order was a first step, but is only just that. Said NIST's Gallagher: "We're at the beginning of the beginning."



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.