Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Hospitals Make Strides To Show Meaningful Use: ONC

Vast majority have adopted certified electronic health record technology, but most EHR systems are not comprehensive, ONC says.

9 Mobile EHRs Compete For Doctors' Attention
9 Mobile EHRs Compete For Doctors' Attention
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Hospitals are making good progress acquiring and implementing basic electronic health record (EHR) systems that are capable of showing meaningful use, but only a small minority have comprehensive EHRs, according to a pair of new reports from the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC).

Between 2009 and 2012, the ONC data shows, the number of non-federal acute care hospitals that had at least a "basic" EHR more than tripled from 12% to 44%. It was in 2009 that Congress passed the HITECH Act, which authorized government incentive payments to hospitals and doctors for making meaningful use of EHRs.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Basic EHRs, as defined by the ONC, include clinician notes but not clinical decision support tools or the ability to order lab or imaging tests or specialty consultations electronically. Those are features of comprehensive EHRs, which were used by 17% of hospitals in 2012, compared to nearly 3% in 2009.

[ Some doctors don't even know their hospital has an EHR system. Read EHRs Underused For Hospital Infection Reporting. ]

The percentage of hospitals that had certified EHR technology rose from 72% in 2011 to 85% in 2012, the ONC pointed out. The reason why these numbers are so much higher than those for basic and comprehensive EHRs is that they include hospitals that had only certain parts of EHRs certified for meaningful use.

Hospital adoption of EHR systems varied across the U.S. The rates of adoption of at least basic EHRs were above the national average in 12 states and below average in 11 other states. The states with the highest adoption rates were South Dakota, Rhode Island and Colorado. New Hampshire, New Mexico and Kansas had the lowest adoption rates.

The other ONC report found that hospital adoption of EHR technology capable of meeting meaningful use objectives increased substantially from 2008 to 2012. Hospitals' capabilities to meet seven of the technology goals grew significantly, with increases ranging from 32% to 167%. The capability that increased the most was the ordering of medications through computerized provider order entry (CPOE).

In 2012, the report said, hospital adoption rates for each of the 14 stage 1 core objectives ranged from 72% to 94%. For all but one of these objectives, adoption increased by at least 20% from 2011 to 2012.

The high rates show the extent to which hospitals are focusing on the implementation of health IT that qualifies them for incentive payments. In contrast, the most recent ranking of hospital EHRs by HIMSS Analytics shows that providers are making slower progress across the gamut of EHR capabilities than the ONC data indicates.

As of the fourth quarter of 2012, HIMSS Analytics' data shows, 38% of hospitals were in stage 4 or higher of the research firm's seven-stage EMR adoption model. That includes all of the providers that had CPOE, which is a core requirement in meaningful use stage 1. In contrast, ONC found that the percentage of hospitals that had CPOE systems for medication ordering rose from 51% in 2011 to 72% in 2012. But it's unclear how many of these hospitals would have met HIMSS Analytics' stage 4 criteria for CPOE, which also includes test ordering. In addition, many facilities still lack clinical decision support and information exchange capabilities.

However, it appears that hospital leaders are increasingly confident about their ability to meet the requirements for meaningful use stage 2. A few months ago, a KPMG survey found that 47% of healthcare executives were only "somewhat confident" about their ability to meet these criteria. But in the recently released annual HIMSS survey of CIOs, 66% said their institutions had attested in stage 1 of meaningful use, and 75% said they plan to attest in stage 2.

Attend Interop Las Vegas, May 6-10, and attend the most thorough training on Apple Deployment at the NEW Mac & iOS IT Conference. Use Priority Code DIPR03 by March 9 to save up to $500 off the price of Conference Passes. Join us in Las Vegas for access to 125+ workshops and conference classes, 350+ exhibiting companies, and the latest technology. Register for Interop today!



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.