Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Interoperability Initiative Poised To Transform Healthcare

Public-private partnership aims to simplify making connections among EHRs and HIEs, decrease interface costs, and better integrate clinical workflows.

8 Health Information Exchanges Lead The Way
8 Health Information Exchanges Lead The Way
(click image for larger for slideshow)
A public-private consortium is about to make a quantum leap in the interoperability among disparate electronic health record (EHR) systems and health information exchanges (HIEs). If the initiative is successful, it will provide "plug-and-play" connectivity between EHRs and HIEs and between HIEs. This would drastically cut the expense of interfaces and would allow more than half of the U.S population and their healthcare providers to access health data shared among multiple states and systems.

As previously reported, Healtheway, the new private-sector entity that operates the eHealth Exchange (successor to the Nationwide Health Information Network or NwHIN Exchange), has partnered with the EHR/HIE Interoperability Work Group to implement standards that will make it easier to exchange health information. The Interoperability Work Group (IWG), led by the New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeHC), is a consortium of 15 states, 19 EHR vendors, and 18 HIE vendors that has been developing implementation guides for interoperability since February 2011.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

IWG and Healtheway have now selected the Certification Commission on Health Information Technology (CCHIT) to perform the testing and certification of EHRs and HIEs, as well as of providers that wish to connect with the eHealth Exchange. CCHIT, the oldest U.S. EHR certification body, is one of the entities designated by the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC) to certify EHRs that providers can use to meet Meaningful Use requirements.

[ Most of the largest healthcare data security and privacy breaches have involved lost or stolen mobile computing devices. For possible solutions, see 7 Tools To Tighten Healthcare Data Security. ]

That's not surprising, because the standards developed by the IWG are closely aligned with those required for Meaningful Use stage 2. Those include an advanced version of the Continuity of Care Document (CCD), which is a clinical summary, and other types of documents that incorporate the Consolidated Clinical Data Architecture (CDA), said Dennis Wilson, director of technology and testing for CCHIT, in an interview with InformationWeek Healthcare.

These standards encompass both the transport mechanisms and the specified content that EHR and HIE vendors will have to employ for a variety of use cases when their systems exchange information. The transport standards encompass Web services profiles used in querying systems and the Direct messaging protocol that many regional and statewide HIEs use to push data from one provider to another, Wilson noted. The Web services profiles were developed by Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), a long-established group in the health IT industry.

CCHIT will employ Aegis, which has a long history with the NwHIN Exchange, to provide a cloud-based testing environment in which vendors can prepare to have their systems tested on a variety of use cases. But CCHIT itself, not Aegis, will do the testing and certification on behalf of IWG, beginning in January. Alisa Ray, executive director of CCHIT, said her nonprofit firm will charge fees to entities that wish to be certified, just as it does to EHR vendors that want to get Meaningful Use certification.

"The compliance testing covers the ability for systems to exchange information using those transports and payloads [i.e., content]," Wilson noted. But CCHIT will not certify the third part of plug-and-play interoperability--the ability for information downloaded from an HIE to go directly into an EHR's data fields. Each vendor takes a different approach to this "reconciliation" process, he noted. Some let doctors decide whether to allow data from a trusted source, such as medications or diagnoses, to go directly into their EHRs. Others require clinicians to look at every piece of data before it's added to their record.

There will be a multistage process for healthcare providers to hook up with the eHealth Exchange (EHE), Wilson explained. First, they have to purchase an IWG-certified EHR. Then they must apply to Healtheway and meet its requirements for membership in the EHE. After that, CCHIT will test and certify the provider's implementation of that EHR. If they pass, they'll get an EHE digital certificate.

There are still some significant holes in the interoperability scheme. Few regional HIEs are part of the IWG, although Wilson expects that to change. No provision has yet been made for post-acute care EHRs. And while some major EHR vendors belong to the consortium--including Allscripts, Cerner, eClinicalWorks, Epic, GE, NextGen, and Siemens--many more are not yet aboard.

Wilson said he expected more vendors to join because the health IT regional extension centers (RECs) are writing the interoperability criteria into their contractual requirements for EHR companies. "If the vendors want to do business in those states, especially if this continues to scale up to more states, they'll have to comply," he said. Ray agreed, adding that providers will also start asking their vendors for this capability.

David Whitlinger, executive director of the New York eHealth Collaborative, told InformationWeek Healthcare that the IWG initiative could be a breakthrough for both physicians and HIEs. Plug-and-play interoperability, he noted, would give doctors the ability to access all of the available information on a patient within an integrated workflow, while reducing the cost of connecting with HIEs.

"One of the principal reasons why providers struggle with HIEs is the broken workflow," he said. "If you have to jump over to an HIE portal to look up the record, and there's no way to get those records into your own EHR, it's really a hard workflow. And the physician community has rightly said, 'This isn't working for us.' That's why we're making the EHRs technically fully integrated with the HIE."



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.