Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Emdeon's $3 Billion Privatization Undervalued, Say Shareholders

The healthcare business management company's majority shareholder and board approve deal with Blackstone, but minority owners protest.


Slideshow: Disney Cancer Center Offers High Tech Care
(click for larger image and for full slideshow)
Emdeon, which provides physicians with revenue and payment cycle management and clinical information exchange systems, has forged a $3 billion privatization deal with investment house Blackstone. But some minority shareholders don't want the sale to go through so fast.

Publicly traded Emdeon announced Thursday that its board and its majority owner, private equity firm Hellman & Friedman agreed to accept the cash offer of $19 per share from Blackstone hedge fund Blackstone Capital Partners VI. The price represents a 27% premium over Wednesday's close at $14.99.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

"This transaction provides for a great return for our investors," Emdeon CEO George Lazenby said in a company statement. "We are excited about the opportunity to move forward with two excellent investors in Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman. They each have an in-depth understanding of our business and industry, and will be tremendous partners as we continue to pursue our strategy of making healthcare efficient."

Shortly after the deal was announced, though, at least a half-dozen law firms representing minority shareholders said they were conducting their own investigations of Emdeon, in part because they believe the Blackstone offer undervalues the company.

"Emdeon has seen dramatic growth in the past year, with its share price rising from $10.00 in September 2010 to $16.00 in July 2011. Indeed, at least one analyst has set a target price of $21.00 for the company's stock," Washington law firm Finkelstein Thompson said in a statement Friday.

"The investigation is focused on the potential unfairness of the consideration to Emdeon's shareholders, the process by which the company's board of directors considered the transaction, and potential conflicts of interests among Emdeon's board members," Finkelstein Thompson continued.

Hellman & Friedman, which currently holds about 70% of Emdeon shares, will retain an unspecified minority stake in the company when the deal closes.

This privatization plan is just the latest in a long line of ownership changes and restructuring at Nashville, Tenn., based Emdeon. The current incarnation as a revenue-cycle management and healthcare transactions processor can trace its lineage to Healtheon, a 1990s dot-com that merged with WebMD in 1999. The combined company, then called Healtheon/WebMD, bought Envoy, a major healthcare transactions clearinghouse, from Quintiles Transnational in 2000. Three years later, WebMD acquired claims management firm Medifax-EDI.

WebMD created the Emdeon name in 2005, creating a holding company called Emdeon, Inc. The current incarnation of Emdeon was called Emdeon Business Services following that restructuring. In 2006, Emdeon sold another subsidiary, Emdeon Practice Services, a vendor of electronic medical records and practice management software, to Sage Group. Emdeon Practice Services included Intergy, the outgrowth of 1990s-era products Medical Manager and MedicaLogic.

The split also created a separate, publicly traded subsidiary called WebMD Health Corp. Emdeon changed its corporate name to HLTH in 2008, which sold its remaining interest in Emdeon Business Services to Hellman & Friedman and private equity firm General Atlantic. Emdeon Business Services then took over the Emdeon name, and in 2009 went public.

HLTH and WebMD Health merged in 2009 to form the present-day WebMD.

Join InformationWeek Healthcare for an on-demand virtual event on electronic health records. You can access presentations and content surrounding EHR selection, deployment, and use, all at your own convenience. Find out more.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.