Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Doctors Concerned About Consumers' Mobile Health Use

Promises of healthcare quality increases and cost savings aren't enough to ease physicians' worries about patients using mobile health tools, new PwC study shows.

10 Wearable Devices To Keep Patients Healthy
10 Wearable Devices To Keep Patients Healthy
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Roughly half of consumers predict that within the next three years mobile health will improve the convenience (46%), cost (52%), and quality (48%) of their healthcare, according to a survey of consumers, payers, and physicians in both developed and emerging markets around the world. Like consumers, health plans are also enthusiastic about the technology, but doctors are showing less zeal, according to the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) survey.

The survey, Emerging mHealth: Paths for Growth, also revealed that 42% of payers, compared to 25% of physicians, encourage patients to let doctors monitor their health and activities using mobile health services and devices. Additionally, 42% of doctors surveyed worry that mobile health will make patients too independent.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Another important sign that doctors aren't fully embracing the technology: only 27% encourage patients to use mobile health applications to become more active in managing their health, and 13% of physicians actually discourage it.

"The study shows that consumers are demanding it, payers are increasingly willing to pay for it, and physicians are resisting it," said Chris Wasden, global healthcare innovation leader at PwC. "For physicians the real challenge is that this type of technology is very disruptive to the practice of medicine. The way that a physician practices digital medicine from a day-to-day workflow perspective, the way the physician staffs his or her office, the way they manage the resources around that is very different from what they [have done previously]," Wasden said.

To prepare the study, PwC Global Healthcare commissioned the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) to conduct two surveys, one of 1,027 consumers and another of 433 doctors (who work in the public and private sector) and 345 executives at health plans. The survey included 10 countries: Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, India, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

[To find out which medical apps doctors and patients are turning to, see 9 Mobile Health Apps Worth A Closer Look]

The study defined mobile health as any type of healthcare delivered remotely--i.e., from a location away from a healthcare delivery organization--using devices such as tablets and smartphones that run health and fitness applications. It also includes wireless-enabled patient monitoring devices such as blood pressure monitors, glucose meters, and weight scales. Telehealth technology also fits under the mobile health umbrella, according to the researchers.

The report suggested that mobile health will have a greater impact on healthcare than other more established technologies like the Internet because mobile devices are ubiquitous and personal, have an attractive price point, and allow users to always be a part of a network through which customers can easily and quickly access information.

The report also states that as the healthcare industry moves toward personalized medicine, mobile health will play a major role in assisting consumers--whether they are in the early stages of a illness or patients with chronic illnesses--to control many aspects of their health, including their weight, high blood pressure, and glucose levels.

Wasden told InformationWeek Healthcare he was pleasantly surprised that the research confirms that mobile health has moved further along in the product and innovation maturity cycle. "We've gone beyond just the original early adopters who are at the technological edge and fringe. ... [T]he people who are most likely to have downloaded health apps, or are using mobile health in its various forms, are actually people that have an illness," Wasden said. "This maturity opens people's eyes with regards to the real impact of mHealth. We are not talking speculatively anymore about what could be, but ... what is happening today and what could happen [if mHealth] is adopted on a broad scale."

Other key findings in the consumer portion of the survey are:

-- 59% of emerging-market patients use at least one mobile health application or service, compared with 35% in the developed world.

-- Nearly half of consumers said they expect mobile health will change the way they manage chronic conditions (48%), their medication (48%), and their overall health (49%).

-- 59% expect mobile health to change the way they seek information on health issues, and 48% expect it to change the way they communicate with physicians.

-- The top three reasons consumers want to use mHealth is to have more convenient access to their doctor or healthcare provider (46%), to reduce out-of-pocket healthcare costs (43%), and to take greater control over their health (32%).

Other key findings among physicians and payers:

-- 64% of doctors and payers said that mobile health offers exciting possibilities, but there are too few proven business models. In addition, the effectiveness of mobile health changing patient behavior is evolving.

-- Payers and providers both cited the complexity and scope of change associated with mobile health as barriers to its adoption. Public sector doctors and payers cited lack of existing technology as the biggest barrier. (Sixty-three percent of physicians in the private sector, versus only 40% in the public sector, have access to wireless connectivity at work.)

-- 45% of doctors and payers said that the application of inappropriate regulations originally developed for earlier technologies is slowing the adoption of mobile health.

-- More than a quarter--27% of doctors and 26% of payers--cite an inherently conservative culture as a leading barrier to the adoption of mHealth.

Get the new, all-digital Healthcare CIO 25 issue of InformationWeek Healthcare. It's our second annual honor roll of the health IT leaders driving healthcare's transformation. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.