Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


New Patient Engagement Guidelines Stress Electronic Tools

National eHealth Collaborative offers healthcare organizations self-assessment tool to measure their success in this area.

5 Tools Connect Patients To Their Healthcare
5 Tools Connect Patients To Their Healthcare
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The National eHealth Collaborative (NeHC) has released a Patient Engagement Framework to guide healthcare organizations in developing and strengthening their patient engagement strategies through the use of electronic tools and resources.

Thought leaders emphasize the important of patient engagement in new healthcare delivery models such as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes. It's also a key requirement for showing Meaningful Use of electronic health records. According to the NeHC announcement, the Patient Engagement Framework took into consideration the patient engagement criteria for Meaningful Use in stages 1 and 2 of the government's EHR incentive program.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

A public-private partnership funded mainly by the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC), NeHC focuses on the acceleration of nationwide health information exchange. It recently expanded its activities in the patient engagement area by creating the Consumer Consortium on eHealth, which includes over 250 organizations and individuals representing all aspects of healthcare.

The Patient Engagement Framework is the result of several months of work by more than 100 individuals in the healthcare, patient engagement, and behavioral science fields. These include members and employees of the Partnership for Women and Families, the Foundation for Informed Decision Making, Healthwise, the Long Term Post Acute Care Association, HL7, ONC's Health IT Standards and Policy Committees, and the Consumer Consortium on Health.

The framework includes several categories of increasing complexity, ranging from informing, engaging and empowering patients to partnering with patients and healthcare communities. Among the modalities of patient engagement within these categories are provider information, e-tools, forms, patient-specific education, patient access to records, and patient-generated data.

Online communications between providers and patients, for example, evolve from secure messaging in the "empower me" phase to full e-visits in the "support my community" phase.

[ There's almost no end to the amount of useful medical information available online. For seven valuable resources, see 7 Health Education Tools For Patients. ]

The framework places a striking emphasis on patient-generated data, ranging from symptom assessments and care experience surveys to shared decision making, advance directives and home monitoring data. The idea of including patient-generated data in EHRs, which is part of the framework, is only a proposal for Meaningful Use stage 3 at this point.

Nevertheless, Leslie Kelly Hall, senior VP of policy for Healthwise and a participant in the project, observed that secure messaging -- which is part of MU stage 2 -- includes a patient-generated component, and that consumers also may fill out pre-visit forms online. So the use of patient-generated data is "not unheard of," she told InformationWeek Healthcare.

The press release stated that some healthcare organizations have been very successful in engaging patients. Hall cited Dartmouth-Hitchcock in New Hampshire, and NeHC CEO Kate Berry, in an interview, mentioned Kaiser Permanente, the VA system, the Cleveland Clinic, and Bellin Health in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

NeHC's Patient Engagement Framework focuses mostly on electronic tools, which leaves out patients -- especially elderly and low-income people -- who lack computer and/or Internet access. However, Hall noted, "A lot of patients are getting access more and more to smartphones and computers in various ways -- through the library and even in their physician's office. This kind of barrier is slowly eroding. Patients get engaged as they find a need."

Another barrier to patient engagement is low health literacy. While the Patient Engagement Framework does not specifically refer to that, Hall said, "We assumed that good quality educational materials are written in plain language that's easily understood and relevant to patients' specific needs."

But do most patients really want to be engaged with their providers online? Although some surveys have found that to be true, many physicians wonder whether they will be able to get even 5% of their patients to view, download or transmit electronic health records in stage 2 of Meaningful Use.

In Berry's view, it's only a question of time and education before patients get involved in their own health on this level. Citing the popularity of online banking, travel and shopping, she said, "I don't know that everyone wanted it until it became very convenient and easy. And those things have transformed how we shop and how we travel and bank."

Today, she said, some consumers "aren't aware of how technology tools can make it easy for them to maintain or improve their health… It may require more educational and awareness building and a dialog between providers and patients to drive growth in the use of these types of tools."

Meanwhile, the Patient Engagement Framework is designed to help healthcare organizations build those efforts and measure their own performance. In partnership with HealthCAWS, NeHC has developed a business intelligence tool to help organizations evaluate the status of their consumer engagement efforts. Called the Consumer Engagement Organizational Assessment, this tool will provide customized progress reports and guidance for improving organizational strategies.

Clinical, patient engagement, and consumer apps promise to re-energize healthcare. Also in the new, all-digital Mobile Power issue of InformationWeek Healthcare: Comparative effectiveness research taps the IT toolbox to compare treatments to determine which ones are most effective. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.