Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


CMS Further Extends HIPAA 5010 Deadline

Healthcare providers now have until June 30 to meet new standards for processing electronic insurance claims.

9 Cool Digital Health Products
9 Cool Digital Health Products
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Facing pressure from healthcare provider advocacy groups, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will push back enforcement of Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12 version 5010 electronic transaction standards for an additional three months, until June 30.

CMS said Thursday that it would apply "enforcement discretion" on 5010 and the related National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP) version D.0 for pharmacy claims through midyear to allow more providers, public and commercial payers, software vendors, and transaction clearinghouses to comply with the standards. The code sets represent an update to the Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) transaction standards that have been in place since 2002, in the form of version 4010A1.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The CMS Office of E-Health Standards and Services (OESS) estimated that the healthcare industry will be sending 98% of claims in 5010 or D.0 format by June 30. Currently, the Medicare fee-for-service program is processing more than 70% of Part A (inpatient) claims and 90% of Part B (physician) claims in 5010. "Commercial plans are reporting similar numbers," CMS said in a press release.

[ It's deja vu all over again as industry works to comply. See Healthcare E-Transaction Change Needs More Time. ]

CMS also said that the Office of E-Health Standards and Services will be providing additional technical assistance with 5010 compliance in the near future. "OESS strongly encourages industry to come together in a collaborative, unified way to identify and resolve all outstanding issues that are impacting full compliance, and looks forward to seeing extensive engagement in the technical assistance initiative to be launched over the next few weeks," the agency statement added.

This is the second time CMS has delayed the original 5010 deadline of Jan. 1. In November, the Medicare agency announced a 90-day grace period after the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA)--now officially known as MGMA-ACPME--asked CMS to develop a contingency plan for 5010 implementation because so many physician practices were worried about disruptions in cash flow if they, their practice management software vendors, or transaction clearinghouses were not ready.

Robert Tennant, senior advisor to MGMA, offered qualified praise for the new delay. "Ninety days is a start, but it may not be the end of the process," Tennant told InformationWeek Healthcare. He said that a lot of MGMA member practices have already experienced cash-flow disruptions. "It's hard to figure out who's to blame when the claims don't get paid," Tennant said.

In a letter to acting CMS administrator Marilyn Tavenner, MGMA asked the Medicare agency to continue to monitor 5010 adoption, and extend the grace period once again if necessary. Englewood, Colo.-based MGMA also requested that CMS "strongly encourage health plans and clearinghouses to provide appropriate and timely feedback to submitters of version 4010 or non-compliant version 5010 claims that identify content errors."

"What we are calling for is for payers to be a little more aggressive in communicating where the problems are" in electronic transactions processes, said Tennant. He urged providers to keep communications open with payers--including Medicare contractors--as well as with their IT vendors, transaction clearinghouses, and other appropriate trading partners.

Healthcare providers must collect all sorts of performance data to meet emerging standards. The new Pay For Performance issue of InformationWeek Healthcare delves into the huge task ahead. Also in this issue: Why personal health records have flopped. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.