Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Feds Take Critical Look At Meaningful Use Payments

Office of Inspector General investigating whether providers' EHR use has resulted in Medicare overcharges.

8 Health IT Certification Programs Offer Career Boost
8 Health IT Certification Programs Offer Career Boost
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has launched a wide-ranging review of government incentive payments to physicians and hospitals for the Meaningful Use of electronic health records. In addition, OIG is looking at whether providers have used EHRs to facilitate "upcoding" of Medicare charges.

According to OIG, the latter part of its investigation is not related to the recent letters to HHS from Republican lawmakers to the Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT, in which leading Congressmen and Senators asked for the suspension of EHR incentive payments. The letters came in the wake of articles in The New York Times and the Center for Public Integrity that suggested the use of EHRs for upcoding had become widespread and was raising Medicare costs.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The OIG's review of the incentive program and potentially inappropriate Medicare payments related to EHR use are both included in its recently issued fiscal 2013 work plan. "We are not doing any work on this that is not in the work plan," OIG spokesman Don White told InformationWeek Healthcare.

[ Most of the largest healthcare data security and privacy breaches have involved lost or stolen mobile computing devices. For possible solutions, see 7 Tools To Tighten Healthcare Data Security. ]

That work plan states, "We will review Medicare incentive payments to eligible health care professionals and hospitals for adopting electronic health records (EHR) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) safeguards to prevent erroneous incentive payments."

OIG also says it will "review Medicare incentive payment data from 2011 to identify payments to providers that should not have received incentive payments (e.g., those not meeting selected Meaningful Use criteria)." This appears to represent an intensification of the random audits prescribed in CMS' Meaningful Use regulations.

Another section of the work plan specifies that OIG will do the same kind of review with regard to Medicaid incentives for adoption of EHRs. Although providers receiving Medicaid incentives need not show Meaningful Use in the first year to get those payments, they must attest that they have purchased, implemented, and operated the technology. OIG will determine whether providers who received incentives actually did what they claimed.

With regard to the upcoding review, a number of hospitals have received lengthy OIG questionnaires about how they use their EHRs, according to report from the recent annual meeting of the College of Health Information Management Executives (CHIME). The hospitals were given until Friday, Oct. 26, to respond to the 18-page survey, a HealthLeaders article noted.

One of the main charges in the New York Times and CPI pieces was that providers were "cutting and pasting" old visit notes into new ones to justify their inflated charges. The OIG questionnaire specifically asked, "Does the hospital have a policy regarding the use of the copy/paste feature in EHR technology?"

The survey covers many other areas, ranging from computer-assisted coding and security and privacy procedures to the manner in which physicians and nurses entered progress notes in their EHRs.

OIG launched this review, the work plan says, after hearing from Medicare contractors that have "noted an increased frequency of medical records with identical documentation across services." To find out how much of this is related to EHR use, the OIG states, "We will… review multiple E/M [evaluation and management] services for the same providers and beneficiaries to identify electronic health records (EHR) documentation practices associated with potentially improper payments."

In September, shortly after the investigative articles were published, the Obama Administration sent a strongly worded letter about upcoding to medical associations. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Attorney General Eric Holder said in the letter, "There are troubling indications that some providers are using [EHR] technology to game the system, possibly to obtain payments to which they are not entitled." The officials said their departments would step up audits and law enforcement to fight the practice.

On Oct. 5, the leaders of four House committees sent Sebelius a letter in which they demanded a halt to Stage 2 of the EHR incentive program. Besides citing examples of what they regarded as weaknesses in the Meaningful Use Stage 2 requirements, the Congressional leaders also cited the New York Times article about the association between EHR adoption and higher charges to Medicare.

InformationWeek Healthcare brought together eight top IT execs to discuss BYOD, Meaningful Use, accountable care, and other contentious issues. Also in the new, all-digital CIO Roundtable issue: Why use IT systems to help cut medical costs if physicians ignore the cost of the care they provide? (Free with registration.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.