Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Virut Malware Botnet Torpedoed By Security Researchers

Spamhaus group scuttles command and control systems for Russian botnet controlling an estimated 300,000 zombie PCs per day.

Security researchers have scuttled the Virut botnet, which was comprised of an estimated 300,000 compromised zombie systems, by shutting down numerous domain names associated with the botnet.

"NASK, the operator of the Polish domain registry, took over 23 of these domains ... in an effort to protect Internet users from Virut-related threats," said Thomas Morrison, who's part of the Spamhaus project, in an announcement. "Name servers for those domains were changed to sinkhole.cert.pl, controlled by CERT Polska [CERT Poland] -- an incident response team operated by NASK."

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The cooperative effort between the anti-spam group Spamhaus and CERT Poland was supported by NASK, which is a Polish research and development organization and data networks operator. NASK also operates the top-level .pl domain in Poland.

[ What is cyber warfare, and how can we prepare for it? Read Uncertain State Of Cyber War. ]

According to Spamhaus, Virut was being controlled by command-and-control (C&C) servers that used top-level Austrian, Polish, and Russian domain names. "In cooperation with the Polish CERT and the registrar home.pl, we managed to get all the Virut domain names within the .pl ccTLD sinkholed," said Morrison. "In addition, Spamhaus reached out to the Austrian CERT and the Russian-based Company Group-IB CERT-GIB to shut down the remaining Virut domains within the .at and .ru ccTLDs. In cooperation with Spamhaus, and due to the evidence and intelligence provided by Spamhaus, CERT-GIB was able to shut down all the Virut domains within the .ru ccTLD within a few hours."

Unfortunately, the top-level Austrian domain name registrar hasn't yet pulled the plug on Austrian domains that are being used by the Virut botmasters. "Having alerted both nic.at and the Austrian CERT multiple times about this issue, we hope that they can soon follow the examples set by the work done with .pl and .ru," said Morrison.

Spamhaus is operating in somewhat uncharted legal territory. Notably, officials at NASK said this was the first time that top-level domain names in Poland had been forcibly blocked. "NASK's actions are aimed at protecting Internet users from threats that involved the botnet built with Virut-infected machines, such as DDoS attacks, spam and data theft," read an advisory issued by NASK.

The Virut botnet was first spotted in 2006 and is believed to be controlled by Russian criminals. In the past seven years, however, the Virut botnet -- which offers a pay-per-install service that charges customers based on the number of PCs the botmasters ultimately infect -- has grown substantially larger. According to Kaspersky Lab, in the third quarter of 2012, 5.5% of all viruses it detected on infected PCs globally were Virut, which made the malware the fifth most widely seen malicious code at that time.

Many of the botnet's dozens of command-and-control systems were operating from top-level domain names in Poland. "Among the C&C servers used by W32.Virut, the domains irc.zief.pl and proxim.ircgalaxy.pl are used by the threat in order to receive instructions," read a Virut botnet overview published by Symantec. "However, recent versions have also included a domain generator backup that is used if the hardcoded servers cannot be reached."

Symantec said it noticed a recent change in Virut behavior, when "long-running Virut C&C domains stopped responding to connecting clients around mid-November 2012 and had a corresponding registrar status change." In fact, the two domain names mentioned -- among others -- were changed to read "undergoing proceeding," as in being subject to a judicial proceeding.

When that happened, Symantec said Virut's operators switched to the domain generator backup, which let researchers gain a closer look at the botnet's operations. Based on the data subsequently generated -- after Symantec sinkholed the botnet domains for three days -- it found that an estimated 300,000 infected PCs per day were connecting to Virut's C&C servers.

According to Poland CERT, that daily infection rate was a fraction of the number of PCs just in Poland that were being infected with the malware on an annual basis. The scale of the phenomenon was massive, according to NASK: in 2012 for Poland alone, over 890,000 unique IP addresses were reported to be infected by Virut.

As malware gets increasingly sophisticated, so, too, must the technology and strategies we use to detect and eradicate it (or, better yet, stop it before it ever makes it onto network systems). Our Rooting Out Sophisticated Malware report examines the tools, technologies and strategies that can ease some of the burden. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.