Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


ICANN Domain Landgrab: What SMBs Should Know

Accountants, retailers, automotive firms, and healthcare companies are among businesses that should be on alert now that ICANN has released its list of proposed new Internet domain names.

10 Windows Ultrabooks: Not Just For SMBs
10 Windows Ultrabooks: Not Just For SMBs
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The next Internet real estate boom is about to get underway. Do you know where your domain name is?

Perhaps a grammatical tweak is in order: Do you know where your domain names are? There will soon be a whole lot more of them. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Numbers and Names (ICANN) just released the list of proposed new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). ICANN received nearly 2,000 applications. Today, website registrants pick from one of 22 gTLDs, though the .com domain has remained the sought-after home for most for-profit businesses, large and small. (After all, it's Facebook.com--not Facebook.net.)

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Plenty of large companies applied to create new gTLDs that reflect their brands and related terms, like .apple or .panasonic. Small and midsize businesses (SMBs) could be impacted in major ways--good and bad--by the pending changes, too. Scan the proposed list and you'll see potential new domains like .accountants, .agency, .architect, and .builders--and we're not even past the letter "B" yet. Skip ahead and you'll find examples like .healthcare, .photography, and .restaurant.

A single company, Donuts.co, applied for all of the above examples--and 300 others, too. You'll never see "math" on a list of my strong suits, but that means Donuts.co forked over more than $56 million in application fees; the startup has more than $100 million in venture backing.

[ Looking for funding to grow your business? Avoid killing your chances with potential investors; read 4 Critical Missteps When SMBs Talk To Venture Capitalists. ]

Roughly half of those gTLDs are uncontested, meaning no one else applied for them. Pending ICANN's review process, Donuts.co will likely end up as the gatekeeper of at least 150-plus new domains and possibly plenty more. While the likes of Apple or Panasonic may simply be protecting their brand and business, Donuts.co doesn't plan to keep these domains for its own use. It intends to become a wholesale power broker in the expanding map of the Internet. It stands to reason SMBs will be among the biggest retail buyers of its domains.

"Those TLDs that are delegated to us, we will make them available, the same way Verisign makes .com available, via the network of ICANN-accredited registrars," said Dan Schindler, co-founder and executive VP of sales and marketing of Donuts.co, in an interview. "All our names will be open to [anyone] who wants to register them. They are generic dictionary terms. There are no trademarks and brands included, and they're all for open use."

The ICANN process spawned a good bit of grumbling from some corners of the Internet--and some outright cries of foul play, too. One issue particularly relevant for SMBs: the $185,000 fee ICANN charged to apply for a new gTLD. That's small change for American Express, which applied to own .amex, but it's prohibitive for a small business with, say, $1 million in annual sales.

The application process now complete, SMBs face both new opportunities and new risks. Let's start with the latter. If you currently own [Awesome Name].com, that Awesome Name might soon be mimicked across a bunch of new top-level domains, unless you've got the time and the money to buy up any and all of the surrounding virtual real estate. There's also likely to be a new wave of speculation and squatting once the new domains are made available for general sale. Donuts.co's Schindler likened it to real estate speculation in the physical world.

"With all this enormous new [Internet] landscape available, I can't imagine there won't be people trying to do that," he said. "That is certainly not our intent. We want people to register our names for affordable prices and use them [to] build their own brands on the back of a short, meaningful name."

Search-engine optimization (SEO) is another area of concern. No one's quite saying how the new domains will impact organic search results on Google, Bing, Yahoo, and other sites. (Google itself applied for more than 100 new gTLDs. The company's chief Internet evangelist, Vint Cerf, explained the applications in a blog post. Cerf was ICANN's chairman of the board from 2000 until 2007.) There's simply no way the domain-name expansion won't have an eventual impact on search results, though, and that could cause some SMBs a new wave of SEO migraines. ICANN noted on its website that the new domains will "potentially change the way people find information on the Internet or how businesses plan and structure their online presence."

The coming changes could also lead to potential confusion among Web users. Once upon a time, you might have safely assumed CompanyName.com was the correct URL. With hundreds of potential new top-level domains, brand recognition may be harder to achieve, particularly for the "S" in SMB. An industry expert I spoke with during the application period said: "Small businesses have a risk of getting lost in the shuffle."

Schindler doesn't agree, noting that confusion exists even in today's relatively limited Internet landscape--especially for websites stuck with long, convoluted URLs. (I'd be remiss not to point out it could also affect short names: It's Donuts.co, not Donuts.com.)

Therein lies the major upside for SMBs. If your business has been wallowing at a less-than-ideal Web address--Lame-Hyphenated-Name.net or DifficultToRememberMuchLessSpellCorrecly.biz--the next Internet land rush presents a significant opportunity for improvement.

Today, if Schindler left his job to open a pizzeria, he could fork over $350 to buy danspizza.com from a broker called DomainMarket.com, which buys Internet real estate and then sells it for a (much) higher price than it would cost from a retail registrar. Otherwise, he'd have to opt for a less recognizable domain still available on the primary market, like danspizza.co. (Run, don't walk: GoDaddy will sell you that name for 13 bucks, a nice discount from the usual $29.99 for .co URLs.) His other choice is the aforementioned more-difficult-name-to-remember.com. None of the above options are optimal. But if Schindler's paying attention and quick on the draw, he might snag Dans.pizza for 10 bucks or so, if and when the .pizza domain is approved for sale.

Note that $350 is actually cheap--plenty of addresses available on the DomainMarket site will run a buyer well north of $50,000. A Fortune 500 firm might pay that price; most SMBs could not. Make a killer habanero dip? HotSalsa.com can be yours for just $70,000. (Sorry, pico de gallo entrepreneur: .salsa is not among the proposed new domains.)

Bottom line for SMBs: If your domain names are at all important to your business, take the time now to figure out which of the new gTLDs may be relevant. (You'll find the full list here.) Tax pros, for example, would do well to note .accountant, .accountants, and .CPA are all on the list. Consider which, if any, new URLs you'll need to register for to protect or grow your business. If necessary, set aside some cash now--pricing remains to be determined and will vary by domain, so use the number of domains you think you'll want as the key variable for now. Then keep tabs on the ICANN review process so that you're ready to act when the new domains go on sale. A similar strategy holds true even if your current URL stinks. Start identifying better options based on the potential new domains and be ready to snap them up quickly when they become available.

As Schindler said, there's likely to be a large land grab, just like there was during the first dot-com boom. Someone snapped up Donuts.com long before Schindler's company was even an idea on the back of a napkin. That's a problem Donuts.co hopes to solve, and yet the solution is likely to create its own, updated version of the same problem. Donuts.com isn't owned by Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Kreme, or another titan of the donut industry. It's registered via a Whois anonymizer with an Australian address; the site itself appears to be nothing more than a link farm, or whichever name you prefer for this particular brand of website spam.

"We don't comment on others' individual domain names, but suffice to say we never had any intention of using a .com name for Donuts," Schindler said in a follow-up email. "The domain name space is now all about specific and relevant names. We're looking forward to launching our great extensions as soon as possible."

SMBs have saved big buying software on a subscription model. The new, all-digital Cloud Beyond SaaS issue of InformationWeek SMB shows how to determine if infrastructure services can pay off, too. Also in this issue: One startup's experience with infrastructure-as-a-service shows how the numbers stack up for IaaS vs. internal IT. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.