Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


Social Task Management Tools Gain Clout

Constellation Research sees social software for getting work done as an important emerging capability, within broader platforms like IBM Connections and more focused tools like Do.com and Asana.

Enterprise Social Networks: Must-Have Features Guide
Enterprise Social Networks: Must-Have Features Guide
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
When it comes to getting work done, social task management products take collaboration beyond the limits of ad hoc sharing through status and file posts, according to a report from Constellation Research analyst Alan Lepofsky.

"Getting Work Done With Social Task Management" is the first of a planned series of reports focused on defining the category. There's no ranking of vendors here, although that's next. "With this one, I just wanted to show that there is this market," Lepofsky said--a market that's distinct from the broader enterprise social software market. Any social collaboration tool can be used for task or project coordination in the sense that a status post or blog entry can be one way of giving a progress report. However, social task management (STM) software groups social interactions around tasks, and tasks can be associated with deadlines, progress milestones, and other structured data for project tracking.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

As defined by Lepofsky, STM includes standalone products like Do.com (from Salesforce.com) and Asana (known for its connection to Facebook), as well as enterprise social networking platforms like IBM Connections with strong task management functionality, and products like Wrike that can be used standalone but also integrate well with enterprise social platforms like Jive.

[ For more insight on collaboration in the enterprise, read What Collaboration Can And Can't Fix. ]

The new focus on social software for getting work done was one of the themes of the Enterprise 2.0 conference in June (since rebranded E2 Social), and Lepofsky also discussed it there. In fact, it's something he has seen as an emerging trend for some time, and he's been studying it intensely for the past several months.

Lepofsky suggests the following three broad categories of products:

-- Standalone: AtTask, Asana, Basecamp, Do, Mavenlink, Producteev, Rule, Strides, and TeamBox.

-- Integrated: Goshido, Neodesic, SAP StreamWork, Sparqlight, and Wrike.

-- Social business platforms with embedded task management: Clearvale, HyperOffice, Huddle, IBM Activities, Jive, Podio, and Traction TeamPage.

"The vendors were all very defensive about where they were put," Lepofsky said. "I tried to explain I wasn't saying one is better than the other." That is, he is not necessarily arguing that platforms are better than standalone products (or vice versa), although he tries to explain the tradeoffs. Those he classifies as standalone tend to have rich feature sets and functionality, with frequent updates, whereas the pace of improvement of IBM Activities might tend to be slower because it's part of the IBM Connections platform. On the other hand, IBM Activities benefits from all the ways it can be used in combination with IBM's broad suite of collaboration software. IBM probably has the most pieces of the puzzle, and as Lepofsky pointed out, "They have a lot of pivot points between them all."

Where the IBM solution gets really cool, Lepofsky said, is for a team conducting a project meeting using IBM web conferencing technology and assigning tasks in IBM Activities as the meeting goes on, with the tasks also associated with the record for the meeting.

Lepofsky is also a pretty big fan of Podio, a startup that was acquired by Citrix in April. While not as high-profile as IBM Connections, Podio is an accessible social software platform in which task management can be organized through user-defined apps. By providing an easy-to-use form builder, Podio makes it easy to start with a generic template and add a field or two that might be required for a specific project.

Jive Software also has some native task management capabilities in its enterprise social networking software, but leaves room for products like Wrike to improve upon it, Lepofsky said.

Meanwhile, SAP argues that StreamWork should be considered a platform, and that it integrates well into other platforms. Lepofsky judged it to be more in the class of products that add a layer of social task management on top of other platforms and applications, including SAP's own products.

Whether the STM capabilities of AtTask should be classified as standalone also depends on your frame of reference. AtTask Teamhome is a social collaboration component of a broader project management toolset, so it's only standalone in the sense of not being part of an enterprise social networking platform.


Salesforce.com's Do.com is one of the standalone social task managers.

Many of the task-focused startups have focused less on traditional enterprise qualities like scalability and integration than on the kind of simplicity that would appeal to consumers or the small to midsize business (SMB) market. That includes Asana as well as Do (which was created by a team that Salesforce.com acquired and has allowed to operate relatively independently).

 1 | 2  | Next Page »


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.