Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series


HP Missed Chance To Dump Autonomy

HP's board didn't hear about allegations of financial improprieties, The Wall Street Journal reports. Deal went ahead despite deep reservations.

Top 10 Tech Fails Of 2012
Top 10 Tech Fails Of 2012
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
A Hewlett-Packard due-diligence team was told of allegations of improper accounting at British software maker Autonomy Corp. before HP made the ill-fated $11 billion acquisition. But the outside auditors who mentioned these charges also dismissed them as baseless, and the due-diligence team never mentioned the whiff of impropriety to HP's board.

This account, reported Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal paints a picture of missed chances, lapses in oversight and hasty decision making at HP in the days leading up to a October 2011 acquisition that has taken its toll on the company's finances and reputation. Autonomy is now at the center of an accounting scandal in which HP alleges that the company failed to disclose liabilities and misrepresented its value before the deal. In November, HP wrote down Autonomy's value by $5 billion.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Autonomy's former CEO, Mike Lynch, has defended the firm's accounting and says he's cooperating with ongoing investigations.

The crux of the The Wall Street Journal account is attributed to unnamed sources close to the deal who say that a due-diligence team including executives from HP and its accounting firm, KPMG, spoke by telephone to a group from Autonomy's outside auditor, the U.K. affiliate of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, after the deal had been announced but had yet to be finalized. The Deloitte team mentioned that an Autonomy finance executive had alleged improper accounting at Autonomy 18 months earlier, but the auditors also said a review had found the allegations to be baseless, The Wall Street Journal reported. The HP team didn't investigate or share the information with then-CEO Leo Apotheker or HP's board, according to the paper's sources.

[ Want more on the future of HP's troubled business units? Read Will HP Sell Autonomy, EDS? ]

The auditors named in this account have a different version of the truth. KPMG told The Wall Street Journal that all information disclosed to it was "equally disclosed to HP." Deloitte declined comment on this latest story, but in November it categorically denied it had "any knowledge of any accounting improprieties or misrepresentations in Autonomy's financial statements."

HP's board, which at the time had eight of 13 members with less than one year of experience on that body, was in the throes of several weighty decisions including the possible spinout of the company's $40 billion personal computer business. The board was split into two teams to address the Autonomy deal and hardware spinout separately, and the account suggests this approach diminished scrutiny and dissent. HP executives including chief financial officer Cathie Lesjak opposed the Autonomy deal as too expensive, according to The Wall Street Journal, but chairman Ray Lane, Apotheker and strategy chief Shane Robison were advocates and championed the deal even as the cost of acquisition surpassed seven times annual revenue and 15 times operating profit.

Had HP senior management caught wind of financial improprieties, it might have had cause to abandon the deal. But once again HP's board was swamped with other matters, as it had dismissed Apotheker in September 2011 and sworn off a hardware spinout in the face of a shareholder revolt. At this point, Lane asked financial advisers if HP could back out of the Autonomy deal, The Wall Street Journal reports, but he was told that U.K. takeover rules "made that impossible unless HP could show financial impropriety."

Among the many jaw-dropping insights in The Wall Street Journal's account is that HP's board and executive management learned that "bloggers and some financial analysts had claimed in the past that Autonomy was aggressive in its accounting" only after shareholders raised their opposition to the deal. And considering HP went far beyond its original financial terms, it seems as if the company turned a blind eye to everything including the numbers in its quest to add enterprise software to its technology portfolio.

With HP's write down, Autonomy's value is now close to its pre-acquisition market value of $6 billion. HP has even received offers for Autonomy, as reported last week. But even a hasty sale of Autonomy will not relieve HP of the financial woes or the legal distractions tied to the acquisition that will likely linger for years to come.



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.