Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary


Oracle's Exalytics Boosts In-Memory And Visual BI Capabilities

Hardware, software combo challenges SAP and specialty visualization vendors.

Oracle enhanced its business intelligence capabilities with the announcement of the Exalytics appliance at Oracle Open World in San Francisco this week. The product, currently in beta, is expected to be generally available by year's end.

Exalytics is a hardware-software combo that brings in-memory and visual discovery into Oracle's OBI EE 11g product line. It's the latest addition to Oracle’s expanding engineered systems that includes Exadata for transaction processing and data warehouse, and Exalogic for the middle tier application server. Previously, I’ve criticized Oracle for its lack of innovation and lackluster commitment to in-memory. Exalytics addresses both weaknesses.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Oracle acquired TimesTen, an in-memory database used predominantly for transaction processing, in 2005. It added support for TimesTen as a data source to OBI EE 11g in August 2010, but Oracle gave the impression that step was more of a checkoff to having BI in-memory, not a deeper integration.

In-memory isn't the only way to boost performance, Oracle argued. There’s Exadata, for example! It's true that for speed-of-thought analysis, there are multiple ways to achieve performance, and in-memory is just one approach. However, it’s an important one, more flexible than, say, indexes and cheaper than SSD. With SAP releasing its HANA in-memory appliance and with the rapid growth of vendors such as QlikTech and Tableau, Oracle has lagged in this area.

With the Exalytics appliance, TimesTen is enhanced for columnar compression and additional analytic functions such as WHEN, RANK, and it's tuned for analytic queries such as subqueries. There's a new adaptive in-memory cache and summary advisory to determine what should go in memory and what's better left on disk. An administrator can override the advisor’s selections.

Both the business meta data layer from OBI EE and the selected data sets are loaded into memory. Similar to HANA but in stark contrast to QlikTech, Exalytics can be queried with straight SQL. Another Exalytics differentiator is that Essbase is optimized for in-memory, allowing for better performance in planning and forecasting applications. On the hardware side, Exalytics has 1 TB of DRAM, running on four Intel Xeon E7-4800 processors.

Oracle says Exalytics has 20 times faster performance than current OBI EE implementations. And a beta customer cites 100 times better performance in some drill paths. One of Oracle's smartest moves is ensuring that Exalytics complements rather than competes with Exadata. Exalytics plugs into Exadata via two InfiniBand ports. This approach also addresses customers' concerns of what to do when all the data doesn’t fit into memory.

In addition to in-memory, the upcoming release includes visual discovery capabilities. Previously, Oracle OEM’d the Tableau visualization tool in an agreement established by Hyperion prior to Oracle's acquisition of that company. That agreement was discontinued earlier this year. Exalytics includes things like micro charts and trellis charts (also known as small multiples). There's a new “Presentation Suggestion Engine” that will recommend a visualization based on the data, no doubt an idea taken from Tableau’s “Show Me” feature. All of this is a vast improvement for customers and Oracle’s BI positioning.

However, based on an early demo of the controlled beta, I don’t think Oracle has a slam dunk here to beat more nimble competitors. Slow them, perhaps. Beat them, I’m not convinced.

The rise of visual discovery tools has as much to do with the visual appeal and rapid time to insight of the products as with their ease of deployment. Exalytics may solve some ease of deployment and performance tuning issues, but the enterprise architecture of OBI EE and its dependence on Fusion middleware components makes it less attractive to lines of business and SMBs.

In addition, competing products do some things better. For example, Tableau and Tibco Spotfire have powerful auto filters and data brushing that Exalytics doesn't appear to have. In QlikTech, the set analysis and faceted search are better. (For more details on how visual discovery vendors compare, see the recently updated "BI Scorecard Product And Vendor Summary")

Further, the new visualization capabilities appear to be tied to the Exalytics appliance. This can be a tough sell for customers who have already invested in OBI EE software and aren't otherwise planning hardware expenses. While I understand that the interactive, visual experience would be less powerful if the environment were slow, I’d like to see Oracle offer some of the software improvements as part of the standard OBI EE upgrade. MicroStrategy, by comparison, recently released Visual Insight as part of its Report Service license, a module most customers have already invested in.

Beyond these criticisms, the fact that Oracle is releasing a major appliance, with powerful visual and in-memory capabilities only a year after OBI EE 11g was released, shows that the vendor is serious about in-memory and capable of delivering BI innovation. I look forward to putting the new product to the test, and to hearing more about pricing and packaging.

Cindi Howson is the founder of BI Scorecard , an independent analyst firm that advises companies on BI tool strategies and offers in-depth business intelligence product reviews.

IT teams areas are packing more information on fewer devices, delivering faster throughput while using less space and power, and managing the needs of more applications with fewer people. Our new report shows how smart CIOs will accelerate this trend by adopting new multipurpose arrays and converged networks. Download our report here. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.