Big Data. Big Decisions
InformationWeek
Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Kurt Marko

Kurt Marko

Contributing Editor

How To Make SharePoint More Social

Can third parties like Neudesic and NewsGator drag Microsoft's entrenched collaboration system into the era of Facebook and Twitter?

Like it or not, SharePoint is the de facto standard enterprise collaboration platform; nearly 75% of the 425 respondents to our recent InformationWeek enterprise content management survey use the product as part of their ECM architectures. As with Exchange, Microsoft has leveraged its hegemony on the desktop to entrench SharePoint as a key piece of infrastructure that organizations use to share documents, organize projects, and link far-flung colleagues into virtual workgroups.

Yet despite significant additions to SharePoint's collaboration portfolio in the newest release, which we outline in our InformationWeek SharePoint 2010 IT Pro Impact Report, its roots are decidedly pre-Web, stemming from the era of discrete Office documents and network file shares, not the age of Web-based Facebook walls, Twitter feeds, and blog comment streams.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

While Microsoft has taken noteworthy strides toward making SharePoint relevant to the millennial work style, with activity streams, user profiles, and content tagging, these still feel like bolt-on additions to an essentially browser-accessed file share. As David F. Carr wrote in covering last summer's Enterprise 2.0 conference, "In a panel discussion on SharePoint as a social platform, the consensus was that SharePoint contains many of the ingredients of a social application, but by itself doesn't get you all the way there--not without extensive customization or the addition of a third-party product such as NewsGator Social Sites."

To fully embrace the social networking ethos, such commenting, tagging, and rating/liking capabilities should permeate the SharePoint environment. This is just the feature gap that several software add-ons have been designed to fill. Instead of replacing the firmly entrenched Microsoft Goliath, as social software specialists such as Jive, Socialtext, and Yammer seek to do with completely separate collaboration environments, these products augment the incumbent, legacy platform with features that make it work more like Facebook and less like TeamSpace.

Neudesic Pulse, one of the more ambitious products, was recently updated to deepen its integration with SharePoint to include a conversation view, essentially a Facebook-like comment stream, for any SharePoint document. According to Ramin Vosough, Neudesic's general manager of product marketing, its vision is to create a "social fabric" within SharePoint, not another siloed collaboration tool. But the product isn't limited to SharePoint. "We want to pull seamlessly from everywhere and expose [social comments] everywhere," Vosough says, adding that enterprises want to incorporate social software features into workflows, not just replace email conversations. "Customers don't want another application; they want to go social with any app," he says. Thus, even a custom line-of-business application can tap into Pulse's commenting system via a RESTful API or by linking to prebuilt, embeddable Web scripts. For example, Vosough says an insurance company might augment a claims-processing workflow application with the ability for employees to add and reply to comments as a document wends through the process. This allows adding ad hoc knowledge to formal content, he adds.

NewsGator's Social Sites for SharePoint is another product designed to bring SharePoint into the Facebook era. With a full range of social software features, from microblogging and activity streams to social profiles and Google Plus-like groups called spheres, Social Sites supplements and extends, rather than replaces, the SharePoint platform. Both Pulse and NewsGator are available as either standalone, on-premises software or as cloud services, and both support Microsoft's cloud suite, Office 365, and SharePoint Online. Neudesic's Pulse cloud plan starts at $12 per month per user, and, while the on-premises product is likewise licensed per user, Neudesic doesn't publicize pricing information. NewsGator is similarly tight-lipped about pricing, although its free trial download page indicates rates as low as $5 per month per user.

While companies like Neudesic and NewsGator work within the SharePoint platform, pure-play enterprise social software like Jive and Yammer take a different architectural approach, creating parallel collaboration platforms. These companies obviously realize SharePoint's importance to enterprise IT, since both have modules that integrate their platforms with a legacy SharePoint installation. Jive's Web Parts effectively merges the two environments by automatically sharing SharePoint files with Jive, allowing content to be added to either platform from the other and displaying SharePoint content and activity in the Jive environment. Similarly, Yammer's SaaS product can link to SharePoint and allows Yammer comment feeds to display on any SharePoint page--say, a shared document or project team portal. Users can post messages and files to Yammer from within SharePoint. Both Jive and Yammer support single sign-on, linking user credentials and identity between their respective environments and SharePoint (i.e. AD).

Although the last two SharePoint releases have made the product much more social and engaging, in a Web 2.0 way, Microsoft can move only so fast and is seemingly incapable of keeping up with the social software innovations popping up online at a frenetic pace. But this doesn't doom organizations that have standardized on the platform for document management and collaboration to outdated features and subpar usability, as the products described above can quickly turn SharePoint into a social animal.

Get lessons from five companies on the front lines of implementing unified communications. Also in the all-digital supplement of Network Computing: Mike Fratto on how to make the case for UC. Download the supplement now. (Free registration required.)



Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

BYTE encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, BYTE moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. BYTE further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.

Follow InformationWeek

By The Numbers

What Are Your Primary Concerns About Using Big Data Software?

Base: 417 respondents at organizations using or planning to deploy data analytics, BI or statistical analysis software
Data: InformationWeek 2013 Analytics, Business Intelligence and Information Management Survey of 541 business technology professionals, October 2012

What Do You Think?

What's your attitude about SQL analysis on top of Hadoop?
We want fast, standard SQL analysis capabilities on Hadoop ASAP
Hadoop is for unstructured data; SQL is for relational databases
We'll give SQL on Hadoop a try, but relational DBs will remain the mainstay
Given strong SQL support on Hadoop, we'd nix the data warehouse
We're not interested in Hadoop
No opinion



Related Content

From Our Sponsor

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Five Big Data Challenges and How to Overcome Them with Visual Analytics

Business leaders often need a visual snapshot of data to quickly grasp and use it. This paper identifies five challenges in presenting data and how visual analytics can resolve them. Solutions are suggested to overcome the challenges of: speed, data clarity, data quality, displaying meaningful results, and dealing with outliers.

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Game-Changing Analytics: How IT Executives Can Use Analytics to Create Innovation and Business Success

Today's competitive advantage requires a deeper understanding of your business, your market and your customers. As an IT executive, you can drive that knowledge transformation. In this white paper, learn how to make decisions as a strategic business leader and three steps to begin an analytics initiative within your enterprise.

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

Data Visualization Techniques: From Basics to Big Data with SAS Visual Analytics

High-performance data visualization turns sophisticated analyses into meaningful graphics, leading to faster and smarter decision making. In this white paper, learn how visual analytics can transform big data, with additional features such as real-time functionality, mobile compatibility, robust applications for technical groups and accessibility for nontechnical users.

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Big Data: Lessons from the Leaders

Financial performance, competitive advantage, operational efficiency, strategic decision making - every business goal can extract value from big data, and the time for doubt or inaction has long passed. In this Economist Intelligence Unit report, in-depth interviews with data pioneers reveal the link between the effective use of big data and the bottom line among other results.

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Decision-Driven Data Management: A Strategy for Better Decisions with Better Data

Which came first, the data or the decision? This white paper makes the case for having a decision in mind, then tailoring big data's volume, variety and velocity to achieve business results such as overcoming customer dissatisfaction or creating well-informed strategies in real time.

Informationweek Reports

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

Research: The Big Data Management Challenge

The challenge of big data is real, but most organizations don't differentiate 'big data' from traditional data, and nearly 90% of respondents to our survey use conventional databases as the primary means of handling data. We'll help you understand what constitutes big data (it's not just size) and the numerous management challenges it poses.