|
|
The InformationWeek June 2004 Archive Main | July 2004 » |
|
The Justice Department has rejected a request to view a database of foreign lobbyists, saying the file is so big that copying it could cause the computer on which it resides to crash and irretrievably destroy data.
Continue reading "10 Good Reasons You Can't Have That Data..."
Start stocking up now on what could be the hot new toy for this holiday season: Litigate Me Elmo! Amazon has filed its response to the Toys R Us lawsuit of a month ago. The spat is over a deal the two struck four years ago: Toys R Us would use Amazon as its E-retail platform and pay a sizeable fee to get a large degree of exclusivity on the site. There are some interesting tidbits in the lawsuits—Amazon claims Toys R Us has been out of stock on more than 20% of its most-popular products; Toys R Us claims an Amazon tool to help mini-merchants will actually let Wal-Mart sell through Amazon. But more than anything, it rings like a deal that's fallen out of touch with the times.
Continue reading "Amazon, Toys R Us Fight On..."
Chalk up another victory for the freedom of adults. The U.S. Supreme Court has sent back down to a lower court a case involving the Child Online Protection Act.
Continue reading "Child Online Protection Act..."
Microsoft’s free, scaled-down version of its SQL Server database is targeted at “hobbyists, enthusiasts, and students,” according to the press announcement out of this week’s TechEd Europe conference in Amsterdam. But the new SQL Server Express Edition serves another purpose: Providing a bulwark against possible incursions by MySQL and other open-source databases into SQL Server’s turf.
Continue reading "SQL Server Gets Small..."
I read too many books. Or it’s probably more accurate to say I get involved in too many books. For example, I am just finishing up “Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology And the Law To Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity,” by Stanford Law School professor Lawrence Lessig. Which I interrupted to read a novel about professional chess players called “The Queen’s Gambit,” by an old writing school teacher of mine. At the same time I am about a third of the way through a book about the Afghanistan war—the first one, the one against the Russians—called “Charlie Wilson’s War.” And I just started reading “Does IT Matter?: Information Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage,” by Nicholas Carr, the follow-up book to his controversial article, “IT Doesn’t Matter,” published almost exactly a year ago in the Harvard Business Review.
Continue reading "Is it checkmate for IT?..."
Large financial companies are putting the hammer down on IT vendors when it comes to the sensitive subject of system security. Under the auspices of BITS and the Financial Services Roundtable, financial companies have signed a sweeping proclamation that computer software and hardware suppliers have to do a much better job of providing secure systems. The industry consortia estimate patch-management and other security issues cost financial companies some $1 billion annually. Since issuing the policy two months ago, BITS last week had progress to report – a concession by Microsoft to reduce the cost of custom support contracts for Windows NT 4.0. The financial companies don't plan stop there. Their software-security policy lays out a detailed plan that includes reaching out to companies on other industries.
Continue reading "Banks act to stem security costs..."