Commentary

Big Business Is Not Immune

The announcement yesterday by Attorney General John Ashcroft that the Justice Department had executed search warrants on five homes and one ISP in connection with alleged illegal copying and sharing of music and movie files didn't necessarily send shivers up the spines of business-technology managers-but maybe it should have.

The announcement yesterday by Attorney General John Ashcroft that the Justice Department had executed search warrants on five homes and one ISP in connection with alleged illegal copying and sharing of music and movie files didn't necessarily send shivers up the spines of business-technology managers-but maybe it should have.This is the first time federal authorities have gotten involved in law-enforcement action connected with illegal file sharing, according to Ashcroft, but it won't be the last. And while private business generally has been excluded from this type of action, that may not be the case for long.

The Recording Industry Association of America has spearheaded the drive against illegal file sharing by filing thousands of lawsuits against file-sharing servers and their owners and participants. In fact, the RIAA reportedly filed lawsuits against 744 individuals yesterday, at the same time the feds were executing the search warrants. But the RIAA, for whatever reason, has by and large avoided targeting businesses, despite the likely assumption that there are servers in big companies hoarding and swapping large caches of movies and music-albeit unbeknownst to the top technology execs.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The feds' aggressive involvement in illegal peer-to-peer file sharing should be a loud wake-up call to business-technology executives that if they are not now on the lookout for this type of secret-or not-so-secret-activity within their organizations, they better get hip to it, and fast. What may have been looked on once as a benign distraction is now a major federal crime. And big business is not immune.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links