Commentary

John Dickinson
 

Two Mergers, Two Circumstances, Two Results

Acquisitions and mergers are a sometimes-wonderful, sometimes-painful fact of enterprise life, and they tend to happen at two distinctly different times in the life of an industry and in the lives of companies in that industry: at the beginning, and at the end. At the beginning, companies that are growing in related, but distinct arenas of a growing industry can often find growth-giving synergy by merging their technological, intellectual, and manufacturing assets. At the end, companies that are no longer growing in the same area of an industry that is no longer expanding, merge in order to survive by sheer numbers -- they think that if only they can get bigger in sales, in employees, in profits, they'll survive.

Acquisitions and mergers are a sometimes-wonderful, sometimes-painful fact of enterprise life, and they tend to happen at two distinctly different times in the life of an industry and in the lives of companies in that industry: at the beginning, and at the end. At the beginning, companies that are growing in related, but distinct arenas of a growing industry can often find growth-giving synergy by merging their technological, intellectual, and manufacturing assets. At the end, companies that are no longer growing in the same area of an industry that is no longer expanding, merge in order to survive by sheer numbers -- they think that if only they can get bigger in sales, in employees, in profits, they'll survive.

The former is the motive behind Microsoft's acquisition of Frontbridge. Sure, Microsoft is big and powerful, but while e-mail has been around for a while, its legitimate traffic continues to grow while its illegitimate -- spam and virus -- traffic grows even faster. Microsoft Exchange has the largest market share among a growing population of installed enterprise e-mail servers, so it's quite natural for Microsoft to acquire a company that can protect that asset. Is there synergy? Sure. Will Microsoft and Frontbridge benefit as companies, and will their executives get big bonuses from the moves? Sure. Will they be deserved? Probably.


More Telecom Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The latter was the motive behind Hewlett-Packard's acquisition of Compaq, and it didn't work. Neither company had a clue about how to compete against the Dell Computing juggernaut. Executives under the leadership of Carly Fiorina at Hewlett-Packard and Mike Capellas at Compaq, were clueless about the innovative marketing and service programs developed by the aggressive Texans at Dell. But they were not clueless about how to squeeze their boards for big bonuses, and so now both have fat bank accounts, Capellas has a job as CEO of MCI, and Fiorina is trying to learn her childrens' names.

Oh, and just last week Hewlett-Packard announced that 14,500 jobs would be cut, and a significant number of research programs would be axed. Make that another 14,500 jobs, for a total of some 40,000 jobs, and some ungodly number of research and development projects and product development projects, axed.

Don't expect job cuts at Microsoft or at Frontbridge. Protecting e-mail traffic is a big job, and expanding Frontbridge to be big enough to cover every Exchange Server out there won't be easy. It'll take lots and lots of human resources, and many of you will be better off for it.

Even more important, it is a sign that the messaging industry, even the difficult part that has to fight spam and viruses, is in a healthy state of growth. That means you can expect more acquisitions and mergers. So far, at least, that's a good thing, and let's keep it that way.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links