The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Security

Topics:   Security

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Getting Serious About Archiving


Posted by Mitch Irsfeld, Sep 16, 2005 01:58 PM

Maybe it's worse than I thought. Is anyone taking message archiving seriously?

I guess it falls into the same category as disaster recovery. No one faults you for spending too little effort and money on disaster recovery preparations until a disaster strikes. Of course, that attitude began to change after 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina brought DR practices to the fore once again.

What is it going to take to get companies serious about archiving?



Maybe it's worse than I thought. Is anyone taking message archiving seriously?

I guess it falls into the same category as disaster recovery. No one faults you for spending too little effort and money on disaster recovery preparations until a disaster strikes. Of course, that attitude began to change after 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina brought DR practices to the fore once again.

What is it going to take to get companies serious about archiving?

Our last poll asked readers how far they go in managing messages for compliance, an activity that entails some form of archiving. It turns out that the majority of respondents still take the easy way out, they either don't archive messages or they archive all messages. It's hard to say which is worse.

The tallied responses show that 38 percent of respondents take the kitchen sink approach and archive everything. That meets the letter of the law, but it has to be costing more in terms of capacity and bandwidth. It saves the headache of having to actually manage the process, much, but I wouldn't want to be in their sneakers when it comes time to produce specific messages as business records.

Another 38 percent feigned ignorance about the necessity of message archiving, so we'll assume they either aren't doing it or aren't required to do it per regulations, or both. Either way, they'll enjoy slogging through backup tapes in an effort to produce messages that someone considers material. Even if specific industry or government regulations don't require it, last I looked we still have lawyers, and legal discovery can get mighty expensive without a well-kept records archive.

Of those who reported that they do archive, 13 percent said they archive according to content (key words and phrases), six percent said they focus their archiving efforts on key personnel which could produce messages of material significance, and four percent said they have a context-sensitive message compliance management system in place.

As more headlines report companies getting tagged with fines or lawsuits for not being able to produce records, archiving will become more commonplace. For those squeamish about managing their own archives, plenty of service providers are prepared to take on the job. In fact, archiving and compliance have become big drivers in the growth of the hosted e-mail market.

So, where do you stand?

« But Can They Help Me Rediscover The Lost Optimism Of My Youth? | Main | Today's Handy Spyware-Avoiding Tip »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. HPC Joins the Dummy Revolution?
  2. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  3. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. HTC Droid Eris To Get Android 2.0 Update
  2. The Causality Behind Apple's Success
  3. iPhone Headed For T-Mobile?
  4. Intel Floats Cloud Computing On A Chip
  5. Verizon Says Droid Fix Coming In A Few Weeks


  1. FTC Probes Nvidia, Intel Licensing Dispute
  2. Government Technologist: States As Cloud Service Providers
  3. Apple Boosts Mac Pro Options
  4. Intel Larrabee Graphics Chip Cancelled
  5. Can Electronic Medical Records Be Secured?
  6. Google Chrome OS Previewed

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007