The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits



Topics:  

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

You Can Believe The IM Numbers . . . And Then Some


Posted by Mitch Irsfeld, Oct 12, 2005 11:15 AM

When it comes to communication technology, the leading edge is a momentary status that is by no means a predicament, and the bleeding edge means the technology got inside your organization without invitation. What else is new?

-->

We've seen some heady projections recently for instant messaging growth, a fact that leaves some scratching their heads, but not me. Sure, it's a technology that IT managers love to hate. Sure, it's a market already consolidating behind some big players. Sure, there are standards issues that would appear to be slowing its adoption, at least in the enterprise arena. But hey, it's a hot, real-time communications technology that promises to keep offering ever-better
functionality, and we humanoids love our communication technology. History has shown we never seem to get enough. Small, incremental improvements? Gotta have 'em. IT won't support it? No problem.

When it comes to communication technology, the leading edge is a momentary status that is by no means a predicament, and the bleeding edge means the technology got inside your organization without invitation. What else is new?


IDC was the latest research house to release its numbers, which pegged the worldwide IM Market, including IM servers, security, compliance and management products at $315 million. IDC expects the market to more than double to $736 million by 2009. If anything, that might even be conservative, but as time goes on those numbers will be harder to prove, especially once IM moves from being discrete products and services to a point where it presence and collaboration capabilities get integrated into other systems.

I'm sure teams of lawyers are already making sure that messaging doesn't become so tightly coupled with an operating system that funny things happen if you try to decouple it, but by then we'll be keeping up with another hot communications technology.

« Spyware Proliferates As Feds Crack Down | Main | Room For Improvement »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Think Parallel 2010, Five Years of Multicore
  2. It's All In the Strategy, It's All About the Design
  3. How To Do Parallelism Without Getting Egg On Your Face


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. More Anti-Virus Fail
  2. Windows 7 Is Really That Good
  3. iPhone OS 4.0 Reported To Feature Multitasking


  1. Google's Tim Bray Hates Apple's iPhone
  2. Global CIO Quick Take: Oracle & Iron Man 2 Seek Super CIO
  3. FCC Broadband Plan Ready For Congress
  4. Bacteria Trail Betrays Identity Of Computer Users
  5. AT&T Adds Web Services For Feature Phones
  6. Congress Targeting Defense IT Acquisition Reform

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007