Topics:  

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Productivity Killers


Posted by Tom Smith, Nov 10, 2005 04:55 PM

A new study on the productivity of the white collar workforce by training organization IBT-USA begs for commentary and further discussion. IBT-USA collected information over a five-year period on the work habits of over 1,000 employees at 30 companies.


Some key findings and what they mean:

* Time spent handling e-mail has increased 220% in the past four years and now averages 8.8 hours per week. I wish I spent 8.8 hours a week handling e-mail. In my case, the figure is at least 15 hours, possibly more. If I read every e-mail I got, it would likely be 30 hours per week.

* Working hours devoted to handling paper or snail mail is down 35%, to 1.3 hours per week. Unless you’re managing the mailroom, an employee who spends nearly an hour and half per week processing snail mail is low-hanging fruit when it comes to better productivity.

* Workers say their time spent attending ineffective meetings increased 300% to 2.1 hours per week. If you notice how hard it can be to schedule meetings with people inside and outside your company -- some of whom apparently spend anywhere from 20 to 30 hours per week in meetings -- I'd guess the actual figure is a lot higher than 2 hours per week. Rather than focus on the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the meetings themselves, I think the focus should be on whether a given person needs to be in some meetings, or whether there's some other revenue-producing activity they can spend time on.

* The amount of time people spend "being interrupted" is up 37%, to 4.5 hours per week. There's two ways to look at this: people get interrupted, but could easily cut the interruptions short and trim that figure by a couple hours. However, those "interruptions" can also be viewed as personal interactions with coworkers, which pay dividends over time in team-building, collaboration and camaraderie.

* Time devoted to "looking for information" is up 13% to 1.7 hours per week. Weren't computers, networks, databases, business intelligence and other systems supposed to make this figure go down, not up? We may have an IT problem there.

* If you took a big chunk out of many unproductive functions (working on backlog, 3 hours per week; planning work, 2.2 hours; attending ineffective meetings, 2.1 hours), the amount of time spent "working overtime" (6.4 hours per week) could go away.

* In a somewhat oxymoronic finding, the average worker spends 3.5 hours per week "delegating work." Can it really consume 9% of the week having other people do work?

How do these data points map to your experiences in your company? Are e-mail, unproductive meetings and the search for information dragging your productivity down?

« External iPod Battery Powers 200 Hours | Main | At Sony, The Customer Is Captive »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.