The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Google

Topics:   Google

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Google's AOL Deal Undermines Its Principles


Posted by Thomas Claburn, Dec 19, 2005 02:17 PM

According to reports over the weekend in The New York Times and elsewhere, Time Warner is expected to announce tomorrow that it will renew its partnership with Google, which will make a $1 billion investment in AOL in exchange for a 5% stake in the company.

While the actual terms have yet to be disclosed, one aspect of the deal is troubling. The Times reports, "Google, which prides itself on the purity of its search results, agreed to give favored placement to content from AOL throughout its site, something it has never done before."

Google has gone to great pains to assure users and advertisers that it provides fair and balanced search results. "We believe you should know when someone has paid to put a message in front of you, so we always distinguish ads from the search results or other content on a page," the company says in its corporate overview. "We don't sell placement in the search results themselves, or allow people to pay for a higher ranking there."

Now, it seems that claim is open to question.


As part of the deal, Google reportedly will feature links to AOL videos on its video search page without letting the user know that those links are effectively paid messages.

AOL will also reportedly get special links leading to its content on the lower righthand portion of Google search results pages, along with its logo. Technically, AOL will pay for these links, though it will do so with credits given by Google as part of the deal.

As Google watcher and author John Battelle told The Times, "What they are giving away is the perception in the marketplace that Google isn't for sale."

This is not to say that Google will compromise the integrity of its search results for AOL. But it does seem as if it will compromise the integrity of the Web page on which those search results appear.

This begs the question: For search engines, is bias bad?

Surprisingly, law professor Eric Goldman argues that it is not. "In practice, search engines are just like every other medium—heavily reliant on editorial control and susceptible to human biases," he writes. "[S]earch engines naturally will continue to evolve their ranking algorithms and improve search result relevancy—a process that will cause the most problematic aspects of search engine bias to largely disappear."

Somehow that's not very comforting.

« Podcast: Symbol Takes RFID Into New Markets And Regions In 2006 | Main | Homeland Insecurity »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Sign Up For The Grok on Google Newsletter
Every Thursday, Tom Claburn and his fellow analysts offer all the news, insight, analysis, and strategic thinking you need to understand the company and complex phenomenon known as Google.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


  :: THE LATEST GOOGLE NEWS ::



 

  1. Visual Studio 2010 Multi-Monitor Support Helps Debugging Parallel Code
  2. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  3. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch
  4. Sprint And T-Mobile Headed The Wrong Direction


  1. Apple Releases Snow Leopard Security Patch
  2. 9 In 10 Web Apps Have Serious Flaws
  3. Agency For International Development Outsources To CSC
  4. Health IT Career Tips
  5. RIM, Adobe Team For BlackBerry Development
  6. Hadoop Crunches Web-Sized Data

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007