The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Google

Topics:   Google

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Mind The (Internet) Gap


Posted by Patricia Keefe, Feb 15, 2006 07:23 PM

Looks like the digital divide is not only not going to get any smaller, it's likely to expand in scope.

Regardless of how it shakes it, I fear the latest great American Internet debate will result in a widening of the gap between the digital haves and have nots - those who can afford basic digital access and tools and those who can not. Depending on from which end we end up eating higher network costs, we could also be faced with an emerging subcatgory among the former, wherein those who have the most money get the best service and the best access.


If you're thinking well, that's the American way - hold on. Creating classes of Internet users is a very bad idea. Why? Because the Internet is essentially a next-generation public utility, and like any utility, access to that service should be equally available to anyone who can afford to purchase it. And that purchase price should neither be prohibitive nor create favored classes. Now that's "Internet neutrality!"

The debate heating up in Washington is about whether cable provider and telephone companies can charge Internet businesses for their heavier use of high-speed networks. All these businesses are jumping into each other's game, or trying to, and looking for any advantage they can get.

The problem for the network providers is that as Google, Yahoo and other Internet service providers expand their offerings, they are sucking up more bandwidth. Google and friends think everyone - meaning companies - should have the same access to the network, regardless of how much they are using or burdening it. Hence the new buzz phrase being bandied about in this debate, and which I mentioned earlier - "Internet Neutrality."

Customers will end up paying the bill - no matter who wins, according to Internet doyen and now Google employee Vinton Cerf. He, of course, thinks the cable and phone companies should go after business and consumer customers for the network access cost he does not think multi-gazillion dollar companies like Google should have to pay or have to pass onto their subscribers.

I can see those companies paying more because they use more, but Cerf is right -we're the ones who will end up paying the tab. What concerns me is that unless some effort is made to keep the tab down, then ever more people might find the cost of getting online simply too expensive. And that's a bad idea, especially coming as it does at a time when Internet access is becoming essential to running our every day lives.

Think about it. More and more of our lives are being conducted online, and I mean solely online. And you have no choice about it. Kids without computers and Internet access will be at an ever worsening disadvantage. But adults will too. The spill over effect is substantial. Travel tickets, job applications, health records, banking, bill paying, purchasing, support for various products and services - what isn't already solely online is going there, soon.

In the same way that most of us can afford to flip a switch to get the same access to the same dose of electricity, we have to make sure that the same holds true for the Internet. You can tell us what you think by leaving a response to this blog entry.

« Carr: Is CIO Rocket Scientist Or Baggage Handler? | Main | Open Source Shakeup »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Sign Up For The Grok on Google Newsletter
Every Thursday, Tom Claburn and his fellow analysts offer all the news, insight, analysis, and strategic thinking you need to understand the company and complex phenomenon known as Google.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


  :: THE LATEST GOOGLE NEWS ::



 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Full Nelson: A Web Presence Needs Sizzle, My Nizzle
  3. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  4. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007