The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Digital Life

Topics:   Digital Life

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Microsoft Is Pushing Your Leg


Posted by David DeJean, Apr 13, 2006 09:40 AM

Gartner Group analyst Todd Kort has discovered that the "Direct Push" email Microsoft built into Windows Mobile 5.0 to take on RIM and Good Technology isn't really push at all. It's fast pull, he tells Unstrung. The differences may be minor. But they're $ignificant.

So why would Microsoft say Windows Mobile does "push" when Kort says devices running the OS actually call the server and retrieve messages? It's not like Microsoft isn't technical enough to understand the difference between "pull" email and "push" email. (It's all about where the command to transfer the messages is initiated. RIM's BlackBerry, for example, uses true push: the server where the mail sits makes the connection to the user's device and transfers the files. Desktop email clients like Outlook and Eudora pull the mail from the server: They ask for whatever's new, and the server responds by sending the files.)

As Deep Throat said, "Follow the money."

The "fast pull" technology has two costs, says Kort. One is easy to understand: because your Pocket PC or smartphone is regularly calling up the server to see what's new, it uses up battery power faster. Not a big deal, maybe, but a factor.

The other reason is pure Microsoft. If Windows Mobile actually supported true push e-mail, then users might get their messages from anywhere, even from (gasp!) RIM servers. This is obviously unacceptable. The only servers on the planet that should be delivering email are Microsoft Exchange servers. Just ask Steve Ballmer. True push email is, in fact, perilously close to the greatest evil Microsoft can imagine, an open system.

It all comes down to customer lock-in. As it has with so many other technologies, Microsoft is loving push email to death and Windows Mobile is carrying the freight. The customer has fewer options and pays the opportunity costs of lower functionality and less battery life.

Do you suppose somebody in Redmond actually asked out loud, "Which is more important, to create an insanely great operating system for small mobile devices, or to sell Exchange servers?" We'll probably never know. But at least Gartner's Kort has shown us the answer.

« Daily News Podcast For Thursday, April 13 | Main | An Engineer Blows The Whistle On AT&T »



Sign up now for the weekly InformationWeek Blog Newsletter.


This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.