Commentary

Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community  

Office 2007 'Shiny,' Says Scalzi

Scalzi has been playing with the Office 2007 beta and loves it. He writes:

I can say at this point that a) I really like the new organizational structure of the features up at the top (the tabs mean you don't have to drill down through several hundred menus to find functionality), and b) I sure hope MS improves its"Publish to Blog" feature, because right now it stinks; I can't get it to play with the Whatever, which is a tragedy, or even with LiveJournal, which it's supposed to be able to do. It has seamless integration with MSN Spaces, however. Yeah, I'm gonna get right on that.

If Word 2007 pans out, it'll make the case for me returning to my PC for my book writing.

I responded in the comments thread:

I 'R a riter myself, and therefore I was surprised to hear that you like writing in Word. I find Word to be way, way too heavyweight for just writing.

Scalzi has been playing with the Office 2007 beta and loves it. He writes:


More Windows Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

I can say at this point that a) I really like the new organizational structure of the features up at the top (the tabs mean you don't have to drill down through several hundred menus to find functionality), and b) I sure hope MS improves its"Publish to Blog" feature, because right now it stinks; I can't get it to play with the Whatever, which is a tragedy, or even with LiveJournal, which it's supposed to be able to do. It has seamless integration with MSN Spaces, however. Yeah, I'm gonna get right on that.

If Word 2007 pans out, it'll make the case for me returning to my PC for my book writing.

I responded in the comments thread:

I 'R a riter myself, and therefore I was surprised to hear that you like writing in Word. I find Word to be way, way too heavyweight for just writing.All the formatting capabilities of Word get in the way of putting text on a page with minimal formatting--bold, italic, and, well, that's about it.

Using Word as a tool for just writing is like using a Greyhound bus for off-road driving. It's just not the right tool.

This is not me taking sides in a religious discussion, by the way--I understand that if people do need more formatting than mostly-just-plain-text, then Word is the way to go. Word is a great tool for anything as complicated as a business letter, and stuff more complicated than that as well.

The overwhelming majority of what I've written in my career is journalism. I've dabbled in fiction (unpublished just yet, but, hey, I haven't checked e-mail in five minutes and maybe an acceptance came in during that time.... ) I use a text editor, NoteTab Pro, for almost all my writing.

I do write fiction in Word, but I keep almost all the formatting turned off until I'm ready to make a printout. My drafts are single-spaced, with an extra space between paragraphs, in a proportional font (Verdana). They're meant for reading onscreen. When I'm ready to print out, I switch to Courier Dark, double-spaced, 1-inch-margins, page number and slug at the top, all that manuscript format jazz.

I've recently thought that I might be able to write drafts in NoteTab, and then import them into Word for formatting--but how would I handle underlines, used in manuscript format to indicate italics? Maybe write some kind of manuscript-formatting macro?

John, I'd love it if you wrote at length about why you prefer to write in Word rather than using just a text editor. Do you write Whatever entries in Word?

Now here's something I didn't say to John: I wrote this entry using a tool called Markdown. Took me about an hour to install, but now that I'm done I can write plain text, copy it to the clipboard, click a button in NoteTab, and then paste down perfect HTML. Neat, huh? Blogger Michael Sippey provides instructions on using Markdown on Windows, and you can just play with Markdown without installing anything using the Markdown Dingus.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links